Pastor John Weaver and Pastor Robert McCurry, two of Georgia's finest — mud-slung by a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Likewise, to attack Pastor Peter Hammond of South Africa shows utter ignorance and —
"8Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh ....
10But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
11Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.
12These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
13Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever. ....
16These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage."
Read the above friend-of-the-world character assassination and blind-groping at and twisting of Scripture to better understand my comments below.
"Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you!" (Luke 6:26)
Remember, the persecution that Christ, the Disciples, and the early Christians experienced was from the Church leaders...! not from the government (not that the "government" will not also be an oppressor, especially when stirred into action by their puppet masters). McDurmon is in good company with Judas, Annas, and Caiaphas. They are on the wrong side of:
"Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. " (II Timothy 3:12)
"And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household." (Matthew 10:36)
"36And others had trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, yea, moreover of bonds and imprisonment: 37They were stoned, they were sawn asunder, were tempted, were slain with the sword: they wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins; being destitute, afflicted, tormented; 38(Of whom the world was not worthy:)" (Hebrews 11)
—andthey may be on the wrong side of Christ's Sword when He returns. Christ said
"He that is not with Me is against Me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad. " (Matthew 12:30)
What was Christ gathering...? —His sheep and wheat. What is McDurmot doing? —scattering the flock and giving it to the wolves; polluting God's garden with tares and weeds. What is a person called who does the opposite of what Christ is doing and what Christ commanded? —such a person is called an enemy. John wrote,
"4He that saith, I know Him, and keepeth not His Commandments, is a liar, and the Truth is not in him. 5But whoso keepeth His Word, in him verily is the Love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in Him. 6He that saith he abideth in Him ought himself also so to walk, even as He walked." (I John 2)
HOW did Christ walk? 100% without sin. 100% in obedience to the Law of God (which was not merely ceremonial or merely symbolic). Morality does not change. God forbade intermarriage. Commanded separation. Those who think otherwise are the blind leading the blind straight into the bowels of Babylon ("confusion by mixing").
This hatchet-job, this ecumenical "whacking" was carried out by a fellow "Christian" — and an alleged "Reformed" leader; not by the ADL or Morris Dees... though I am sure they will get in line.
This is abominable. Step right up to the abomination of desecration. Step right up and sacrifice the pig on the altar! The Commandments about only clean animals was just "symbolic" or "mere ceremonial law". Defile yourself forever to show how much you love Jesus! Those who do so follow a false christ, because they do not know God and the Truth (Christ, the Way, the Truth, and the Life; and the Holy Spirit of Truth) is not in them. God declared,
"If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is Holy, which temple ye are." (I Corinthians 3:17)
No, Ruth was not a Moabite as I show in my book Sacred Truth Eexpository Commentary on Ruth: The Truth About Ruth—Ruth the Israelite! (328pp., pb., 18.00 + P&H). She was an Israelite living in Moab (see also Jeremiah 40:11).
If Ruth was a Moabite then King David was a bastard and by God's Law (which was not "ceremonial" or "symbolic"), therefore, he was not eligible to be king of Israel and Christ Himself, therefore, was a bastard and could not be Kinsman Redeemer or the spotless sacrifice. This means that God violated His Own Law in accepting David—even declaring him to be a man after the Lord's Own Heart (said of no other person the Bible). God's Law, which David loved and followed and taught (and not symbolically or ceremonially) declared that Israel was not to set as ruler a stranger over themselves. God declared that a mongrel (bastard) could not enter the congregation (any place of Israelite society) not even unto the tenth generation*—no not ever. Matters of holiness and life or death are not "ceremonial" or "symbolic".
[* an idiom meaning "never". It does not mean that in the 11th generation they could come in. Tares are never converted into wheat. Hybrids are an abomination for they destroy what God created. If Rahab was a Canaanite (which she was not) and Ruth was a Moabite (which she was not) then David was a double mongrel. David was the 2nd generation from Boaz by Ruth; and thus Solomon through the godly kings Asa, Jehoshaphat, and Joash were all unacceptable to God. Further, Scripture says "A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD. An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever" (Deuteronomy 23:2,3)]
Please Joel, say it clearly.
Tell us all that Christ was a mongrel.
I would like to have it on record!
Fortunately for you BLASPHEMY against the Son shall be forgiven, but not blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
So, why stop there? Why not also blaspheme the Holy Spirit.
Please, after you blaspheme Christ, go ahead and declare out loud that the 100 books that I have produced have been by the power of Satan, not the Holy Spirit...!
Please, let's get this on record. Make it front-page news that you declare my 100+ books (none of which you have ever read) to have been written under the influence of Satan, because I maintain that God did not abolish His Law—and it was not merely ceremonial or symbolic.* I maintain that morality does not change and morality is everything that God declared, "Thou shalt not" and "This shalt thou do". This includes racial and gender boundaries. Are you soft on gender boundaries too? The same verses you will use to defend racial perversion are tied to homoperversion. Do you defend homoperversion? God declared that He separated His people from all others peoples even as He separated clean animals from unclean—and He put a difference and commanded us to respect and honor and obey that difference. God separated the races and clean and unclean animals by their very design in the act of creating each different. You do realize that sheep did not evolve from pigs (or vice versa), don't you? It is the same with people.
[* Is the sanctity of your wife merely symbolic or ceremonial? Would you mind if someone defiled her? Then why do you so casually encourage the defilement of Christ's bride?
Go ahead and declare that the Christian-Anglo Israel doctrine is a doctrine of the Devil and not of the Holy Spirit!
Please, let us get this on record.
Go ahead and declare that it is a doctrine of Satan to suggest that God wants His people to maintain the purity of the race in which He created them and go ahead and declare that nothing would make Jesus happier than for the peoples of Christendom to pollute their bloodlines with third world aliens and drive themselves into extinction because the Devil invented the notion of race and God hates racial purity.
Please Joel. Make those declarations if that is what you believe. If it is not what you believe, then you better start backpeddling fast and get on your knees and ask God to deliver you from your antichrist doctrines and forgive you for suggesting that the Master's children breed with the dogs on top of the Master's Table...!
Zipporah was not of a different race or God would not have allowed Moses to do what God forbade the people to do. The leaders are held to a higher standard. You preach on a kindergarden level and in complete disregard for the facts and you disgrace the Reformers and the (presumed) Presbyterian faith which you pollute.
Even at the time of the return of the captives and later in Ezra and Nehemiah's day alien wives were commanded to be divorced and all children by them sent away. God is Immutable. Morality does not change. Your mind is polluted by the world. How dare you call yourself Reformed. You are a "Reformed" Trojan Horse.
Rahab was neither a Canaanite or a harlot as I demonstrate in my STEC on James 2 / Rahab. Those who think that Ruth and Rahab were aliens demonstrate that they have never even scratched the surface of the Biblical text and their spiritual understanding is as shallow as the grooves on a record.
No Hebrew or Greek word for "stranger" or "alien" or "foreigner" or "sojourner" carries any racial connotation whatsoever. Likewise, the Hebrew and Greek words misrendered "Gentile" (a miscarriage of translation Anglicized from the Latin gentilis from the Hebrew goy / goyim and the Greek ethnos / ethney) are collective nouns and simply means "nation" or "people". Like pronouns, to whom the words for stranger and "gentile" refer can only be discerned by context. The words can be used of Israel or God's enemies. The words can be used of the Israelites of the diaspora or pure cousin kinsmen nations—or they can be used to refer to those peoples whom God forever cursed and from whome God commanded His people to forever be separate and not seek their peace or prosperity forever, neither love them or do good unto them. To confuse the two groups of people is to violate the Word of God and assist in the destruction of Christendom. The word "Jew" can be added to this list also. Before the captivity the word referred only to an Israelite of pure blood of either the Tribe or House of Judah. After the captivity, it referred to anyone of any race who happened to be living in the land of Israel, especially those who pretended to be Judah when they were not (Revelation 2:9, 3:9). After Israel was deported the king of Assyria moved in around a dozen pagan peoples; and the Canaanites themselves, and Ammonites and Moabites also moved into the land. Then in 126 b.c. Judean Maccabee leader John Hyrcanus conquered Edom and foolishly and in violation of the Law of God "force" converted them. It was then the Edomites infiltrated Israelite society and adopted Israelite custom (circumcision, sabbath, passover, dietary laws) when it suited them. The Herods were Edomites. By Christ's day the land of Israel was a mixed multitude and for that reason He spoke in public only in parables because the Truth was only meant for His sheep. He said, "I am only sent unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel". He commissioned the disciples, "As the Father sent Me so send I you." Gabriel announced His conception, "Call His Name Yehoshua [Yahweh-saved] for He shall save His people from their sins". In Jeremiah God said that He would send hunters and fishers to find His people Israel. Christ called the disciples and said, "Follow Me and I will make you fishers of men" and Christ told Peter, "feed Me sheep". After the parable of the tares in the parable of the fishes Christ said that all sorts of fish were gathered into the net; the good were kept but the bad (putrid) were cast into the furnace of fire. The putrid are the unclean species. The good fish are God's people; the sheep are God's people. Can you not follow a simple story line? God said that He would regather whom He scattered; He said that He would make a full end of all the nations whither He had scattered Israel but He would not make a full end of His peopel; but regather and restore them.
It is amazing that professed Bible "experts" are so blind and that their knee jerk reaction is to claim the very opposite of truth, and claim that God violated His Own Law and changes or compromises or accepts sin or makes exceptions to morality and smiles upon and embraces that which He declared to be abominations. Oh yes Joel. That's what it is: MORALITY. The same goes for any man who defiles his father's wife, or his brother's wife, or his uncle's wife. Do you think those laws were "symbolic" or "ceremonial" also...? Race mixing and homoperversion have been considered by Christendom to be abominations for the past 1,950 years, but in the past 68 since antichrists and aliens have invaded Christendom and turned the City on a Hill into a Garbage Dump, race mixing and homoperversion are now glorified and celebrated. Do you really believe that the wicked antichrist world that denies and opposes all that God called "good" and embraces and celebrates all that God called "evil" just happens to be right on these two issues (and homoperversion is following the EXACT SAME PATH trail blazed for it by race mixing). Do you think the morals of society, the intellectual understanding, the level of eductation, the self-control, and the form of doctrine espoused now in Christendom is better than it was right after the Reformation? right after the American Revolution? Are our streets and schools safer now than then? illiteracy? espousal of outright falsehoods which people will defend with violence? morally just wars? rigorous and pure defending of our Constitution, the Common Law, the Law of God? integrity of politicians? Indeed, our modern world enjoys thousands of time-saving luxuries and conveniences (all inventions of those wonderful third world peoples, right?)—but that is the only progress. Everything else daily suffers greater and greater deterioration, degeneration, demoralization, dechristianization. What fantasy world do you live in or what brand of glue have you been sniffing?
It is amazing such fools prefer to believe lies and heresies and be friends with the world; rather than rightly divide the Word of Truth. But how can they when they are blind to it?
This Reformed-heretic actually writes:
"...race or genetics have never had any determining effect on godly culture. Even the bloodline laws of the Old Testament were symbolic and ceremonial in nature."
Close your eyes to the evidence—relegate everything in the Bible that you don't like to being "symbolism" or the ever-elusive "ceremonial" law. This is an outright LIE. It is blasphemy against the Word of God.
Civilization would never have existed were it not for God preserving an elect line from Adam and keeping that line from intermarrying with aliens. Did you ever look up in Strong's Concordance and see what the word Adam means? Do you believe in evolution?
Look at what our cities and nations were like 70 years ago. 150 years ago. LOOK AT THEM NOW! HERE IN OUR DAY you can see it happening RIGHT BEFORE YOUR EYES. NONWHITES FLOOD into Christendom. Do they bring a "christianizing" and "civilizing" effect? Do you smile and does it make you feel warm inside to consider the 1,000 German women in Cologne, Germany raped by Muslims on New Year's Eve a few years ago? That is just a drop in the bucket. The political prostitutes in charge of Germany say they will not prosecute african and arab muslims raping women because it is part of their culture. Does that give you the warm fuzzies Joel? What about the brutal gang rapes where 50 or more men and women shield a white woman from view in public while dozens of muslims rape and beat her? What about the murders? arsons? stealing the neighborhoods our ancestors built? living off welfare, having baby after baby, not paying taxes on their business for 5 years, then selling it to his cousin who won't pay taxes for 5 years, receiving benefit after benefit further destroying our economy and plunging us farther into unpayable debt while the implement sharia law and demand special treatment and discriminate against Christians...? What do you think of all that Joel? And yet you attack men who preach what Christ preached and who preserve what Christ commanded us to preserve. Balaam's jackass had more spiritual discernment! Even the demons believe and tremble. McDemons apparantly do not tremble, or believe. Yes, modern Balaams, prophets for hire, have no fear of God even though they spew antichrist doctrine. God and His Holiness is foreign to them (or is God's Holiness merely symbolic and ceremonial? and thus our obeying His Law to be holy as He is Holy is likewise merely symbolic and ceremonial; we can just think pretty thoughts in our minds and then go a whoremongering in the pig stye... right? Not me.). What about all the black on white murders in the US ever since so-called Civil Rights? What about all the savage torture murders of peaceful white farmers in South Africa who feed everyone, blacks included. By the way, the Dutch South Africans / Boers ("farmers") never owned blacks as slaves. NEVER. The did not steal the land from them. They peacefully settled the land long before the blacks descended that far south. It was the blacks (Xhosa/Zulu) who then murdered the smaller yellowish africans, Khoi-Khoi and Khoi-San (bushmen and hottentots). Real a truthful book (like Bulala, Cuan Elgin), not communist, Talmudic propaganda. What about the Apartheid and the Wall in the State of Israeli? Does your bathroom mirror have two angles so you can see both your faces? From where do you receive your orders? Tel Aviv?
How many times in your lifetime have you seen whites riot, destroy and burn down a city, attack innocent people simply driving by and drag them out of vehicles and beat them in the head with bricks? How many whites have you seen in the news chopping people up with machetes, blowing up themselves with bombs, or burning people alive? How many white men gang rape and beat up women or even dogs?
If you and your wife are downtown in a major city do you think you may be mugged or knocked out by a white man? do you think your wife would be raped by a white man? Of course white are sinful and wicked too. But if you think they are the same, why do you not live in the ghetto, since genetics has nothing to do with morality or godly culture...? Hmmm....? Black pastor James Manning understands reality better than you do.
Really. I can show you dozens of Godly societies—nations! Kingdoms! that resulted from Christendom among the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, and related peoples; who, by the way, have been the ONLY ones to PRESERVE the Reformed Faith—the only ones to FORMULATE the Reformed faith; the only ones to UNDERSTAND the Reformed Faith. Why is that? Why is it that when other races claim conversion and people of other races then abominably become pastors of those denominations in Christendom that those demoninations then depart from the truth and fall into Arminianism and Pentecostalism and paganism?
How many nonwhite civilizations can you point to that had even 1% of the civilization and Christian doctrine that the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, and related peoples had before the nonwhites began to pollute Christendom? Why is it that no nonwhite nation or people ever even heard of God until white missionaries or explorers or doctors told them about Christ and the Bible? Hmmm...? Does God play dice and roll coincidence...?
Why is it that none of the nonwhite nations were known as CHRISTENDOM? Do African or hispanic or oriental or indian nations send aid to their sister nations when disaster strikes? what about to alien nations? how many nonwhite nations participated in the crusades? I can count various nonwhite nations that were on the other side of the crusades (including the Greeks of that time, who were mostly Turk and were not the Greeks of antiquity). Where are the moral pinnacles of civilaztion in Africa? Arabia? the Orient? Do they send missionaries around the world preaching "love"...? The jews and muslims teach "love"...— or "conquest" and "submit" or die...? Is that the refinement you so greatly praise? Have you ever studied the Reformation? Have you ever studied the Crusades? Have you ever studied the millions of Christians tortured and murdered by the Bolshevik Jews, the Mulsims, the Indians, the Africans, the Hispanics? Why do you live in a white country? or and why don't you live in the black ghetto nearest to your home? You are a hypocrite of the worst type. Did you marry a white woman? Do you attend a white church? I imagine you would be happy if your children married aliens; I guess your parental method is "do as I say not as I do"...?
God tells us that He commanded us to keep His Law "throughout all our generations forever".
—how do you twist this into being "symbolic" or "ceremonial"...? This is the lowest grade of heresy passing itself off as spirituality. Very little (IF ANYTHING) was "ceremonial" in the O.T. You will find the English word ONLY ONE TIME in the WHOLE OF THE BIBLE translated as "ceremonies"—and it does NOT mean a mere ritual. The Hebrew word mishpawt #4941 means "verdict, law, sentence, decree, etc" and although Strong does not so list it, it could also be rendered "determination".
McDurmon (or is that McDemon?) is the enemy of Christendom and the enemy of God because he has chosen to be a friend of Babylon and the world. Is he so spiritually blind that he cannot see that the only two things that the world HATES are (white) "racism" (a word that didn't even exist three-quarters of a century ago) and "homophobia"...? Please, for the record WHICH BIBLE VERSE do you claim DEFINES and DECLARES "racism" to be a sin and abomination? I can point out numerous verses that say race mixing is. WHAT IS YOUR BIBLICAL SUPPORT? Why are you not telling the JEWS IN THE STATE OF ISRAELI to stop their discrimination and persecution of the Arabs and pseudo-Persians and Palestinians? Why don't you tell the Israelis to intermarry with the Palestinians and Arabs and pseudo-Persians and pseudo-Syrians and grant them "equal rights" in the State of Israeli? —because you are a Zionist? —because your plan is to destroy Christendom and strengthen the enemies of Christendom? If not, please explain why...? We will wait. But please at least respond and inform us how many years that may take to actually Biblically defend your position and explain your behaviour and your glaring hypocritical behaviour and hatred of the builders of Christendom and love for the destroyers of it?
Who has rights in black african nations but blacks? Who has rights in Arab nations but Arabs? Who has rights in the State of Israeli but Jews? Who has rights in Oriental nations but Orientals? Who has rights in Indian nations but Indians? AND YET AMAZINGLY McDemon chooses to ATTACK CHRISTIAN BRETHREN instead of denounce all those other nations for their "RACISM". What about the United Negro College Fund? The Thurgood Marshall Foundation? What about Oprah Winfrey and Bill Gates giving millions of dollars of scholarships to NONWHITES ONLY...? It is VERY VERY INTERESTING whom you choose to attack and whom you choose to ignore. What about the Israeli's stealing land that is not theirs? discriminating against Christians and Palestinians? Is witnessing for Jesus illegal in the State of Israeli? Is the New Testament illegal in the State of Israeli? What about the Israeli lawmaker Michael Ben-Ari tearing up a New Testament? Have you ever heard Christ's parable of the person with a telephone pole stuck in his eye who went around trying to pull the tiny specks out of other peoples' eyes...? LOOK IN THE MIRROR! and the mirror of God's Word! You defend the dogs and the swine and abuse the Master's children. Why is that?
Can you not see that everything that God hates and forbids the world LOVES and CELEBRATES...? Can you not see that everything that God loves and commands the world HATES and DEMONIZES and tries to OUTLAW...? Can you not see that you are on the WORLD'S side and not God's...? You are so close to the world, you cannot even see God. If you heard sound doctine from God Himself you would accuse Him of sin!
McDemon believes in a CHANGING GOD and a LOOSE MORALITY. The very same verses that are blatantly taken out of context in the attempt to justify interracial marriage "neither Jew nor Gentile / Greek"* .... the same passages also say "there is neither male or female"... So, according to your Biblical interpretation, then homoperversion is fine too! By the way Joel. What is your official position on homoperverion...? Is it a sin? Does Jesus love homoperverts? Will there be homoperverts in the Kingdom of Heaven...? Please, speak up and put it on record!
[* —which means neither Judean or Israelite of the diaspora, since Amos said God would do nothing except He reveal through His servants the prophets and God always forbade mixing with the heathen—even Revelation echoes Corinthians, Isaiah, and other passages to "COME OUT".]
How immoral it is for you to claim to be a Christian minister, a minister of Christ Jesus, and teacher of God—for you to espouse and spew antichrist teaching! By your own words you are helping rape the bride of Christ and you are helping to murder God's children! You violate the expressed command of Christ, "Give not that which is holy to the dogs and cast not pearls before swine, lest they turn and trample and rend you!" Oh, I guess that too was "symbolic" and "ceremonial".
What part of the Bible do you believe was NOT merely symbolic or ceremonial? How much of the Bible do you think is OBSOLETE?
PLEASE, I WOULD LIKE THIS ON RECORD!
You are encouraging the Master's children to breed with the dogs and you think the Master is going to be so happy with you! You shall have the greater condemnation!
Have you never read a quality book that refutes your position? (I've written 100 of them). You are not worthy of being called Reformed or Presbyterian. Have you ever read Luther's "the Jews and their Lies"...? which I reprint. Do you think that the Reformers would have married their sons and daughters to savages? or to Jews or Turks (both of which are Hittite-Canaanites), Africans, or other peoples whom God cursed?
The prophets foretell the DESTRUCTION of the Canaanites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Babylonians, the Egyptians, etc., AND ALL THE MINGLED PEOPLES. Oh, I guess that is just "symbolic" and "ceremonial". Who has the Green Lantern Magic De-coder ring to tell what is "symbolic" and "ceremonial" to distinguish such things from those that are REAL...? Oh, I guess it is just Joel Osteen, oops, I mean Joel McDemon. How much of the Bible do you think is immaterial, symbolic, ceremonial, obsolete, unimportant, just an archaic idea or outdated way of looking at something? I guess you, like Tullian Tchividjian,* think that Leviticus 19:28b is one of those outdated, ceremonial, symbolic obsolescences and that it is okay to defile God's temple, your body, which is not yours, but God's...?
[* —one of Billy Graham's grandsons, the Arminian (Hittite) defrocked former apostate pastor that defiled the pulpit of Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, founded by Dr. D. James Kennedy. http://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2016/march/tullian-tchividjian-con... ]
When life and death and eternity is involved, it is truly odd that many would not "err" on the side of caution. The same goes for those who may doubt that Hell exists (see my 800pp., What the Devil? — What the Hell?). Even ignoring (or twisting) the Biblical evidence, considering the consequences of believing there is a Hell if there is not; or believing there is no Hell, when there is—on which side would you prefer to err? So it is with the issue of interracial corruption and homoperversion. However, the issue is far greater than that. You are not merely throwing caution to the wind and casually erring on the side of error, but you are leading hundreds of thousands into the chasm of disobedience and death with you. Is your middle name Korah?
Tell me, what are the consequences if you preserve your bloodlines as God commanded and it turns out that all those Scriptures were horrendous typos in the Prophets? NOTHING. There would be no consequences.
BUT NOWHERE does God command, "BASTARDIZE YOUR BLOODLINES TO PROVE TO ME HOW MUCH YOU LOVE ME. PUT A BONE IN YOUR NOSE AND RUN AROUND NAKED!"
On the other hand, what are the consequences if you are WRONG and GOD DID COMMAND PURITY? You get to spend eternity on the wrong side of God!
FURTHERMORE, it is one thing to play Russian Roulette with your own life; it is quite another to play it with the lives of all of Christendom—to put a gun in the hand of Christ's bride and say, "Pull the trigger". Jesus will be so happy with you. I can just see it now.
You really need to get your head out of the world's toilet and into the Word of God. The Bible, like the U.S. Constitution, is not to be interpreted according to the polluted notions of an immoral and subverted society. Both are to be interpreted according to the spirit in which they were given at that time. Neither are "living breathing documents" that chance with the times. Such notions are antichrist.
As with this ecclesiastical character-assassin, the rest of the enemies of Christendom (those who are not pretending to be Christian leaders) will lump together all kinds of people who may hold hold traditional moral values—dishonestly grouping together Christian and nonchristian, godly and carnal, conservative with militant, holy with sinful. Character assassination and smear terrorism are dishes best served cold by a Judas. Is Joel McDurmon, is Joel Beeke no different than a traitorous politician who pretends to be Christians and pretends to be conservatives who then makes a 180 degree turn once in a position of power and begins corrupting and destroying from within? Instead of circling the wagons in a defensive last stand, it seems McDurmon is setting fire to the wagons of the peaceful settlers and joining with the injuns. Some serial killers and even cannibals were Baptists. Should all Baptists be lumped together with serial killers and cannibals?
Well Joel, you will need to lump Christ Himself, and Moses, Phinehas, Ezra, and Nehemiah into that category of "racist". Go ahead. Cast the first stone at Christ... or even Moses, Ezra, or Nehemiah if you dare.
Have you not read Nehemiah 13
"25And I contended with them, and cursed them, and smote certain of them, and plucked off their hair, and made them swear by God, saying, Ye shall not give your daughters unto their sons, nor take their daughters unto your sons, or for yourselves. 26Did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things?"
Do you think this is ceremonial or symbolic? If ceremonial or symbolic, I'd prefer a normal haircut. Christ Himself commanded give not that which is holy to the dogs and cast not pearls before swine; and He said that it was not meet to take the children's bread and give it to the dogs. By the way, for those who can't read and retain and correlate, the woman of Cana was not a Canaanite. Mark calls her "A Greek woman, a Syro-phenician by nation (that is, geopolitically; it was where she lived). Christ did not call her a dog. Christ was referring to her daughter. The word Christ used was koonarion, which means, "puppy". Why are professed Christian leaders—even Ph.D's so ignorant? Do they never actually study? Do they never pray for God to guide them into truth? Or do they pick the position they want to believe and then twist the Bible to make it look like it supports their humanistic notion? The (ancient) Greeks descended from the Israelites (even as the Greek language descended from the Hebrew—even as the Romans descended from the Greeks and the Roman language from the Greek). This woman actually knew the Law of God and understood the overflow of blessing principle. She did not ask for her daughters sins to be forgiven or for her mongrel daughter to be adopted into God's family (which would be an abomination; adoption* is not the modern polluted notion). She had a demon. She asked Christ to deliver the daughter of the demon. That is all Christ did. Why did the woman have a mongrel daughter? Maybe she had been sold as a slave and used by her alien master? However, the thing to focus on is not what we don't know—and not with humanistic emotions and notions—but upon what the unchanging Word of God declares. Have you ever played "Simon Sez"...? It's easy once you learn the rules. You don't seem to have learned the rules. The Laws of Hermaneutics are quite simple. God is Immutable, Holy, Perfect. He cannot lie, make a mistake, have a better idea, get confused, or contradict Himself. What God says first sets the standard by which all that follows is to be interpreted. You seem to think the way to interpret the Bible is to throw away every previous verse when a subsequent verse seems to say something different (especially when viewed through the antichrist world's rainbow colored glasses).
[* "4But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, 5To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons." (Galatians 4) "4Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; 5Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came," (Romans 9) #5206 hweeosethia does not mean "adoption" as in the modern notion. First of all, both passages above deny such a meaning as adopting an alien into another racial family. The Greek word rendered "adoption of sons" means, "son-placing". The Greek word that is part of the word, #5207 hweeos means son, that is, a place of honor; it is not the mere Greek word for "child (as produced)" #5043 teknon. The meaning of Biblical adoption is that of a legitimate heir coming of age, or a legitimate son who was disgraced, being restored to a place of honor (as typified in Christ's parable of the Prodigal). There was no need for Christ to be born of a woman under the Law to redeem them under the Law, if those born under the Law (God's people, true Israel) were irrelevant. Paul says "we". Paul was an Israelite of the House of Judah, of the Tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews. He could not possibly be included in adoption into Israel, if the meaning is an alien being adopted into a foreign race. Likewise, Romans says that adoption (son-placing) pertaineth to Israel—in the exact same way and degree as the Covenants, the Promises, the Law, etc. Polluted modernist or confused notions of Scripture do not invalidate the true Doctrine—spurious interpretations merely identify the espousants as enemies of Christ.]
By the way, the U.S. from its inception was the shining light of Christendom. In order to hold public office one had to be a free, white, land-owning male who was a Christian and lived a moral life. By the way, interracial marriage and homo-perversion were originally CRIMES in the U.S.
That's what built Christendom; the opposite of it is what has destroyed it.
Even black pastor James Manning has declared on his videos, "Black folk ain't got no business running no nation". He saw how the blacks destroyed South Africa and every other nation in which they shared the rule. Manning keenly exhorts blacks to just let the whites run the country and be happy you are here and not in Africa.
The Bible is not on your side. History is not on your side. Reality is not on your side.
This was an all-out attack against traditional Christian values and an attack against Christendom—by an alleged Reformed leader.
75 years ago 90% or more of the population of Christendom were against interracial marriage.
Then the traitors at the helm of our nation killed off millions of our people in a few wars.
Then they began importing 3rd world aliens (I believe the same lies that Merkel is telling, "someone needs to pick the tomatos and wash the dishes).
Then began the brainwashing in the government as policy, in the schools, the media, in advertisements (often starting with just an off-color arm, or a very light mixed child or a very light mixed person laughing and smiling and everyone else smiling and laughing), the came mixing (and then homoperversion) in the sitcoms (laughing seems to be a desensitizing mechanism that works toward tolerance and acceptance), and movies—all of which first broke the ice of and then rigorously pushed interracial marriage; then homoperversion followed the VERY same path.
WHERE NOW is the "love, tolerance, and acceptance and equality" of the race-mixers and gender-benders, which they so passionately claimed champion? Now they are the most-hateful and most-intolerant of all, and they have you now as their spokesman too...! Surely your price was more than 30 pieces of silver? (counting for inflation and all).
Does it make you feel good to try to earn your face's spot on Mount Crushmore...? to help destroy Christendom...? —to have your face there next to Obama, the Pope, and Stalin?
And, no Joel, skin color is not the only racial factor. That is simply the only racial factor that non-observant 5-year olds notice. Have you ever studied biology or physiology? pathology? psychology? sociology? anthropology? —from a non-evolutionist and truly Christian perspective?
In 1900 Europe was home to 90% of the world's Christians. 10 years ago it was less than 1%. Is that what you call progress? It is if your christ is the Antichrist.
The U.S. is in similar straits. Get a few older issues of almanacs and a new almanac Joel. Compare crime statistics. Prison statistics. Welfare. Disease. Numbers of members of Christian denominations of any kind, as well as SOUND denominations, the few dinosaur relics that are left. Compare the so-called National Debt. All the unconstitutional things for which taxpayer money is illegally extracted (theft) and used (treason). Compare Population demographics. Have you seen the homopervert parades, celebrations, LAWS to protect perversion? how it is promoted in advertisements from soup to nuts, movies, sitcoms, literature, organizations, government funding, even schools, universities, and churches...? Compare statistics and how many such things existed in 1900? Did elementary school children in 1900 have books like "Heather has Two Mommies" read to them? Were elementary school children in 1900 taught that gender is whatever you want it to be and you can decide, while at the same time being fed soyburgers which screw up their hormones, while having their minds plastered with music, literature, tv, commercials, advertisements, news stories, and even cartoons, with fuzzy or even blatant gender and racial boundaries? Is this progress to you Joel? If it is, you just outed yourself. You are a friend of the world and the enemy of God and you don't even know God and the Truth—Christ Jesus, the Holy Spirit, the Word of God is not in you!
You are seeing the fulfillment of the Dragon / Serpent vomiting forth a flood (the Third World) to drown the woman and her child (God's people, the people of Christendom). You are seeing the fulfillment of Nebuchadnezzar's great dream image, the statue whose feet were made of iron mingled with clay, which represents integeration—and the LAST KINGDOM of this earth. Or do you think those are merely "symbolic" and have no real meaning?
Why do you think that Christ said unless the Father draws those days short no flesh of the elect will survive?
God promised to preserve a REMNANT—not "symbolic" or "ceremonial". What did Christ say about the wicked people to whom the land was leased who murdered the servants and then heir of the landlord, thinking that they could steal the inheritance for themselves? Do you think that God was wrote for people murdering His children if it doesn't matter who His children are? If it is merely symbolic? Do you think that God will smile if God's baby—His firstborn son—was stolen out of the nursery and Satan's baby put in its place? Would God smile and tickle the baby and go "cootchie, cootchie, coo...!" and bounce it on His knee? Do you think it did not matter whether Jesus died on the cross or whether Satan died on the cross? If it is merely symbolic or ceremonial, what difference does it make? Do you think Christ will smile and accept any bride not of His Own choosing—especially a bride that violates God's Law—forced upon Him to be His wife? Your mind is polluted Joel, and you interpret the things of God through the immoral eye of man, instead of conforming your mind to God's Mind. His never changes. If you think that it does, you believe in a false god. See my book, Does God Repent? — Can God Change His Mind?
Satan knows that if he can destroy the true remnant of God's people (the legitimate peoples of Christendom) through MURDER and MONGRELIZATION—two forms of GENOCIDE (such a pretty word when it is happening to white Christians... eh, Joel...?), if that pure remnant of true Israel, the unpolluted peoples of Christendom, if that pure remnant can be utterly mongrelized or murdered out of existence, then God will have failed to keep His Promise and thus if God can fail in even one area He is not the Immutable, Perfect God of the Bible that He holds Himself out to be (which is not symbolic)... and thus, Satan will renew hopes that he can eventually defeat God altogether.
We are the battleground Joel. And you are fighting in Satan's army and helping to destroy God's people!
Satan knows that his days are numbered. Once Christ returns to set up the Millennium (do you believe that is symbolic? what about Hell?) then Satan will be cast into the Lake of Fire for 1,000 years.
Satan's plan is to destroy the true peoples of Christendom.
No other people on earth is under such assault.
No other people are Christian.
We are God's people. We are facing extermination by all the nonwhite nations of the world. No white nations are invading their nations, forcing them to mongrelize.
Can you put 2 and 2 together Joel? Can you not see the writing on the wall?
"20Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! 21Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!" (Isaiah 5)
"30Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that steal my words every one from his neighbour. 31Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that use their tongues, and say, He saith. 32Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the LORD, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the LORD." (Jeremiah 23)
Did God cause His people to be conquered and taken into captivity over "symbolism" or "ceremony"...?
The nations of Christendom experienced our Golden Ages when our nations were comprised of OUR people. The alien invasion has resulted in our destruction; and like other false prophets (shamefully named after the prophet David and the prophet Jeremiah) imagine that we are to be happy about the flood that the Dragon has vomited out of his mouth to drown us, and that we should embrace the tsunami. Show me where in the Book of Revelation (or any of the Prophets) where God tells us to marry our children to the flood the Dragon spews forth to destroy us? God opens the earth to receive (destroy) the flood to help give a little respite to the woman and her child, otherwise, none of the elect would survive before God draws those days short. Nowhere does God inform us to "convert" the flood.
Every great civilization fell because of violating God's command not to marry outside the race. Have you ever studied history and civilization?
"Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin", Joel.
Read Luke 12:20 for the last time.
Tonight is Passover.
Will the Death Angel pass over?
Will God grant you the gift of understanding and repentance?
I pray that He grants you understanding and conviction and repentance unto life; or that He quickly causes you to reap what you have sown, and that your blasphemies and cooperation in the destruction of Christendom God judges quickly as a testimony to your antichrist teaching and to prevent the mass and enertia of antichrist stupidity and treason to continue to build against the truth and God's people.
"For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind" (Hosea 8:7)
"For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting." (Galatians 6:8)
"30For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. 31It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God." (Hebrews 10)
"let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear: 29For our God is a consuming fire." (Hebrews 12)
"For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed." (Malachi 3:6)