[I am not happy to have to title this article as I have, nor the previous one (Joel McDurmon Enemy of Christianity and Christendom and Enemy of God... or Judas exposes Peter and Paul). I would love to be able to amend them both if peradventure God would grant him repentance to the acknowledgment of the truth. However, Joel McDurmon's own declaration asserts: "At such times, leaders must speak with clarity and force." Though I am not a leader (a leader presupposes followers) I am one who full time for 28 years has "stood in the gap" and who has been a lone voice crying in the wilderness, and who has been a trail blazer and I done my best to "make straight [level]" the path for the remnant to eventually find the path and return to God.]
The entire article below (titled "Line in the Sand..."*) is pontifical assertion. Hot air — gas.
[* You may wish to scroll down (about 16 or 17 hits of the "page down" button) first and read it first, as it is short.]
Not a single Bible verse is used to give Scriptural support for a single assertion that is made.
It is subjective "self-appointed" ecumenical opinion—calling upon the masses who agree with him to denounce those who do not agree with him; and he is demanding that those who do not agree with him and his pontiffs, "to repent" and agree with him or be defamed and excommunicated (from his papal fantasy).
He pontifically assumes that everyone reading agrees that anyone who disagrees with him on this point should be excommunicated; and he calls on all such persons, all Christian leaders, speakers, Bible conference leaders or attendents to discriminate against such Christian ministers and speakers based upon their religion—based upon their sincerely held Biblical supportive views.
He must think that he is the Pope of Protestantism. He claims, I believe, Presbyterianism, Reconstruction, and Theonomy. I don't think that John Knox or R. J. Rushdoony would recognize him. He has, without realizing it, excommunicated himself from the True Church of Christ. "If any man preach any other Gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." (Galatians 1:9) Separation is commanded of God's people from Genesis to Revelation. Not being unequally yoked is commanded from Moses to Paul and John. To not understand the Old Testament and God's Plan is to misinterpret the Gospel and the Great Commission.*
[* See my, Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on Romans, 758pp., pb., 40.00 + P&H; Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on Hebrews, 632pp., pb., 30.00 + P&H; Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on John 3; and my upcoming Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on Jonah, 600pp., 30.00 + P&H. See also my Apologetic Exposition series, (Acts 13, Acts 15, Isaiah 56, II Corinthians 3; Galatians 3, 88pp., 6.00 + P&H each; and John 4, 46pp., 4.50 + P&H) ]
Morality does not change. Unions that God forbade in the Old Testament do not change in the New. Those who think that they do are in the mere infancy of their Biblical understanding. A "Christian leader" with a telephone pole in each eye, thinking that he sees specks in the eyes of others, is ludicrous. It can be likened unto an episode of the "Three Stooges", in which a person is carrying an 8-foot long 2x4 on his shoulder, and abruptly, without warning or circumspection, quickly turns around 180o and innocent bystanders get wacked in the head. In a movie that is supposed to be a comedy, it is semi-funny (but only to those who have never actually been hit in the head with a 2x4; it's not really that funny, except to children with undeveloped minds or borderline psychopathology, or adults who are little different). In a presumed "Christian leader" it is not funny at all. With telephone poles sticking out of both of his eyes, no one in his vicinity is safe, and it is no surprise that he cannot understand the Scriptural text. Such people are like aspiring political shooting stars; but they shall reap what they have soon and they will quickly "burn out" and "plummet" to earth; even as Heyleyl was cast out of Heaven. You are at a crossroads: "Humble yourselves in the Sight of the Lord and He shall lift you up." (James 4:10) — or "Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall" (Proverbs 16:18) — "let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall." (I Corinthians 10:12) — for "God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble" (James 4:6).
"1 And now, O ye priests, this Commandment is for you.
2 If ye will not hear, and if ye will not lay it to heart, to give glory unto my Name, saith the LORD of hosts, I will even send a curse upon you, and I will curse your blessings: yea, I have cursed them already, because ye do not lay it to heart.
[Glory is given to God's Name by obeying Him.]
3 Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces, even the dung of your solemn feasts; and one shall take you away with it.
4 And ye shall know that I have sent this Commandment unto you, that My Covenant might be with Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.
5 My Covenant was with him of life and peace; and I gave them to him for the fear wherewith he feared Me, and was afraid before My Name.
[Those who do not obey God's Commandments do not fear Him; neither do they love Him.]
6 The Law of Truth was in his mouth, and iniquity was not found in his lips: he walked with Me in peace and equity, and did turn many away from iniquity.
7 For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they [God's people] should seek the Law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.
[If the priests turn from the Law of God, they are no longer God's priests, but like Balaam, prophets for hire (and for eventual fire).]
8 But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the Law; ye have corrupted the Covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.
9 Therefore have I also made you contemptible and base before all the people, according as ye have not kept My Ways, but have been partial* in the Law.
[* That which is translated "partial" is a compound Hebrew word meaning, "lift the face". I believe the intention is something like "turned up ones nose from" (as if avoiding a horrendous odour or something that he deems offensive or "beneath him". This seems to coincide with "He that turneth away his ear from hearing the Law, even his prayer shall be abomination." (Proverbs 28:9) and "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to Me: seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." (Hosea 4:6) Consider this warning...! "Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap." (Galatians 6:7) But rather, heed: "19 I call Heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you Life and Death, Blessing and Cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live: 20 That thou mayest love the LORD thy God, and that thou mayest obey His Voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto Him: for He is thy Life, and the length of thy days" (Deuteronomy 30) and "As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?" (Ezekiel 38:11)]
10 Have we [Israel] not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the Covenant of our fathers?
11 Judah hath dealt treacherously, and an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem; for Judah hath profaned the holiness of the LORD which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god.
12 The LORD will cut off the man that doeth this, the master and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering unto the LORD of hosts." (Malachi 2)
He does not call upon the authority of Scripture, but instead engages in blatant argumentum ad hominem as well as shameless ad baculum and ad populum. When God and the truth are not on your side, yes indeed, you must appeal to the masses (and the majority is usually wrong—especially if they follow false leaders).
He is as dishonest as he is ignorant and arrogant.
He issues papal decrees laced with deceit when he pompously declares that any Christians who oppose what Joel thinks that God declared to be good ("racial intermarrage" is the "goodness" to which he unbiblically refers), "are in grievous error and sin themselves"—but he nowhere offers a single Bible verse as evidence that God called interracial marriage "good" or that God commanded all the races to intermarry. However, a plethora of verses to the contrary can easily be found.
[Actually, God forbade intermarriage in His Primary Law of "Kind After Kind". One reason that God sent confusion at Babel was because He had commanded the peoples to disperse (segregate) and they did not. The historical event at Babel did not include every race, but primarily Hamites (who were not black), Japethites (who were not oriental), and Semites (not the Jews). Some of these men were wicked, having departed from the Way of God. They were a bad influence on the rest. Furthermore, there were some that God did not want together, even though they were related. However, Nimrod established himself as a tyrant and attempted to dominate all as a warlord (he was "a hunter [of men] in God's Face"). Nimrod attempted to establish a mighty tower in whose top was the heavens (at the top it contained a shrine dedicated to the worship of heavenly bodies; and eventually the worship of himself). After they dispersed God broke up the singular continent and set continental drift into motion (faster initially, but then slowing down). This was in the days of Peleg, in which the earth was divided. See, Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on Genesis / Judges, 711pp., pb., 40.00 + P&H. See also my annotated editions of Races in Chaos, 6x9 pb., 214pp, 16.50 + P&H. and Kind Unto Kind, 6x9 pb., 524 pages. 27.50 + P&H.]
This erroneous declaration, that those who oppose what God called good—wildly claiming that God called racial intermarriage "good'—are therefore in sin, itself is a cluster of confusion (of which God is not the author).
First of all, it shows ignorance of the meaning of the Hebrew word tob (long o as in strobe) and in what context God declared all to be "good". First of all, what "good" means in this context primarily is not a moral declaration, or even a declaration of perfection (though both those things can be inferred, for the most part*). What this means is that it was "exactly how God wanted it to be for His Purpose". Scripture tells us that He did all "for His Own Good Pleasure"; this is what "and God saw that it was good" means. Furthermore, before each declaration of "good" we are told "after its own kind" (10 times in the first chapter of Genesis; 10 being the number of "Divine Perfect Order".
[* Isaiah tells us, "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things." (45:7) Is light "darkness"...? Is evil "good"...? Is black white"...?* No, that would violate the law of contradiction and render all thought to be invalid nonsense. It cannot be: for God pronounced a curse on those who call evil good and good evil. God created the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Was a Tree that was half evil "Good"...? —only in the sense that it was the way that God wanted it to be (pleasing in His Sight, for His Own Good Purpose). For more detail, see my Does God Repent? — Can God Change His Mind? and God and Evil.
* Those who think that skin color is the only racial difference are infants in their understanding. Those who have a problem with reality hate God. Those who reject God's Decrees hate God. Those who side with the world instead of Scripture (or who pervertedly "interpret" Scripture according to the sinful notions of the God-hating world, again, hate God. Those who think God is bound to change and conform Himself to what sinful man imagines is "fair" hate God. God feels the same way about them: "The LORD trieth the righteous: but the wicked and him that loveth violence His soul Hateth." (Psalm 11:5) Race mixing and homoperversion are violence. They violate God's Law. They destroy His creation. They destroy civilization. An honest study will show that such perverted mixing leads to the end of a civilization / empire. Such was the end of all great empires.]
Secondly, just because God declared everything to be "good" does not mean that it was good for chimpanzees to copulate with any other animal if they so desired. This is a non sequitur fallacy of "missing middle". Joel must wear quasi-theological 10-League Boots to make such grand leaps across doctrinal continents.
However, Scripture is replete with passages that tell us that God created each after its own kind. One must be utterly ignorant of true biology, anthropology, and psychology* and believe in EVOLUTION in order to believe that all races came from Adam or Noah's sons. Evidence of similarity is not evidence of sameness. Emotional dynamics (or psychotic notions) do not decide reality. God decreed all. He determined the elect in Christ before the foundation of the world. He created various forms of life as separate and distinct creation. The fact that they all bleed "red blood" is an infantile notion.
[* —and that is another reason for the feverish push to have all races amalgamate—because then the clear and stark differences in biology, anthropology, and psychology disappear as all are lost in one mongrelized mass: Babylon, "confusion by mixing"—and the Great Whore is the one who has lain down with all the kings of the earth. Whores and whoremongers are those who first cross the racial and gender boundaries that God established. Joel is a high priest for the Harlot Church. The Harlot Church is Antichrist. May God grant him the Holy Spirit of Conviction and Repentance and Understanding before he leads others astray to share in his fate unless he turns from the path of destruction that he is on.]
Evolutionist fools say that man's DNA is 99% the same as our "nearest relative" the chimpanzee! [or more precisely, "humans share 98.8 percent of their DNA with bonobos and chimpanzees. Humans and gorillas share 98.4 percent of their DNA."] According to scientists, 98% of man's DNA is the same as that of pigs; 80% with mice; 60% with fruit flies; 50% with bananas, and 25% with "our cousin" the rice plant! Why did Joel not marry a baboon or a pig? 98% or 99%—what's the difference? According to Joel and others like him, there would be no sin in marrying a gorilla because nowhere does God say that you can't (if, as Joel thinks, God's Law has been abolished—yet the same Law that forbids homoperversion and bestiality forbids race mixing; those who don't like it are free to find a more "user-friendly" religion). Since God created the gorilla "good", then it must be a good mate for humans... right? God created laws and moral boundaries. If those moral boundaries could not be crossed they would be barricades—and barricades are no test of obedience. Disobedience has consequences—unpleasant, long term, even permanent consequences. All who descend from Adam share in Adam's sin. Does Joel think that is "fair"...? Does Joel deny that doctrine also? However, Joel ignores the boundaries that God established, in order to be a friend of the Harlot Church and with the world (Babylon)—and thus, he is the enemy of God. If he is not lusting after being a friend of the world then why does he espouse the world's rhetoric and philosophy and dogma? Really Joel, can't you see that everything that God commanded and loves the world hates and demonizes; and everything that God hates and forbade the world loves and celebrates. This is a "no brainer" even if you don't know the Word of God. It's time to change church membership Joel. Come out.
The majority in modern society are also fooled by looking at the many shades of hybrids and thus assuming that the original stock whence they sprang is similar to us—when they are not; they are 10 times worse than the hybrids—but just because hybrids are better than outright savages does not justify hybridism which God forbade. The majority are hybrids. Why do you think God commanded, "Come out of her My people"...? The mongrelized majority, like a massive mud-slide are gaining mass and momentum. God will not be forced to change and accept those who attempt to force themselves on Him; God will not accept the children thrust into His nursery, replacing His very children; and Christ will not have a bride forced on Him, whom He did not choose—especially since it violates His Own Law and would defile Him (Matthew 11:12; John 10:1). Would you accept a bride forced upon you that violated all that was holy? assuming that you care about what is holy; rather than what is pleasing to the world. Those who have no concept of Holiness have no concept of God's Decrees and espouse a hedonistic humanism that forces God to please man.
Disease will contaminate all if the sickly are not quarantined; if the healthy do not separate themselves and refuse to allow the sickly to force themselves on them. It does not sound "nice" or "fair", but those concepts do not overrule reality or God's Commands.
Babylon is winning (at least, to those who don't realize that is part of God's Plan to demonstrate His Power when He delivers His elect remnant)... and now they have Joel as their champion.
Even during the days of slavery, in the south, some immoral whites began mixing their seed with their female black slaves because half-breeds brought better prices on the auction block! Amazing... they were not even good slaves compared to a half-breed. Furthermore, again, in lusting after being a friend of the world, Joel condemns slavery without a trial! Paul did not tell Philemon to free his runaway slave Onesimus, but to treat him kindly and receive him back without abuse. God established laws of slavery in the Old Testament. Is God immoral Joel? We are called slaves (that's what a "bond-servant is"—that's what someone is who has been bought with a price, who is not his own) of Christ Jesus. Is Jesus immoral Joel...? Does He need to repent and come grovelling to you also...? Scripture says "be ye not unequally yoked".
God commanded His people to be completely separate from all other people. God did not tell the Israelites to "convert" the Canaanites and then marry them. Why is that Joel? Christ said to the Syro-Phenician woman (who was a Greek, an Israelite either of the dispersion or from a contingent that left Israel around the time of the conquest; members of the tribe of Judah or Danites who took to the sea), "It is not meet to take the children's bread and give it to the dogs". Christ was not referring to this woman, but to her child. The Greek word is koonarion, "puppy". Her child was mixed. The woman had faith (a gift of the Holy Spirit to the elect of God's people with which they believe unto salvation) and she knew the Hebrew Scriptures. She did not say that the puppies were the same as the Master's children, but they could have the overflow of blessing if they maintained their proper place. God commanded in Deuteronomy 23:2 that no bastard (mongrel) and specifically no Ammonite or Moabite could enter the congregation (not the church service, but Israelite society in any way) not even unto the 10th generation, no not ever. Was God immoral for saying that Joel? Was God immoral for commanding Israelites who sinned and married alien women to divorce them and send all women by them away forever. Do you think that God "changed", Joel? Do you think that He "repented of sin" and "turned over a new leaf" and "changed" His declared perpetual Standard of Morality that He commanded us to follow throughout all our generations forever? — the Law of which Christ said not one jot or tittle would pass and that He did not come to destroy the Law...? How can we obey the command, "Be holy as I am Holy" if the "Standard" for us has "changed" but the Standard for Him has not because He is Immutable and He cannot change...? What does "Reformed Theology" mean in your mind Joel...? Maybe that needs to be established; like deposing Bill Clinton. Common words that we take for granted and assume that everyone agrees on their meaning, when duplicitous people are involved, words need to be defined and their meaning nailed down.
The "Edomite" and "Egyptian" in the next verse in Deuteronomy 23:3 is referring SOLELY to the original Egyptians: who were pure Hamites, and not Nubians / black; the Egyptians became a mingled people over millennia of intermarrying with Nubians (who did not descend from Ham) from Sub-sahara that were later imported for slaves after the Israelites left the nation of Egypt in shambles after God's Judgments had fallen on Egypt—and God declared that the Egyptian nation would never again amount to anything... HOW did God accomplish that? by having them intermarry with Nubians and Turks... as you would have Christendom do, which would result in the same destruction.
Christ said give not that which is holy unto the dogs and cast not pearls before swine lest they turn and trample and destroy you. The "reason" given is NOT the main reason, but a secondary, resultant reason. The primary reason is because it is an ABOMINATION and because God forbade it. Likewise, the intermarriage with the Canaanites God FOREVER forbade; a secondary, resultant reason was because God's people would learn their filthy perverse abominations; the primary reason was because it was an ABOMINATION and God forbade it: It destroys God's people whom He created separate and distinct and in His Very Image. It destroys His Image! Thus murder is a sin and so is race mixing. God commanded all alien wives to be divorced and all children by them sent away. God ahead Joel. Tell me that God was evil and needs to repent. Tell me Jesus was evil and needs to repent.
American pastor and Evangelist John R. Rice, though he was in error on some significant points understood the Biblical position far-better than you Joel.
[22 pages; written and 5,000 copies were printed in 1956; 5,000 reprinted in 1959. This booklet was reprinted several other times, once adding to the title the words, "Shall We Mix Races in Schools?" According to one printing, 46,000 copies of the booklet were in print.]
[I reprint dozens older books and booklets by American pastors and evagelists. Not all were as good thinkers as others; but at least they did not remain silent in the face of the destruction of Christendom. Inquire.]
Many other Bible scholars held the same position. Most all of them did before the modern era of being raised in the government mind-perverting schools and compromising apostate churches, colleges, and seminaries. Are you a product of the public schools Joel? Most Christian schools are likewise perverted. My Christian High School (class of 1980) and my Christian College—both once in the highest national ranking... are now both subverted, and so are most all other Christian institutions because they adopt the polluted world's philosophy and dogma and reject the Word of God. Truth does not change. Immoral, dishonest people change what is considered truth; and bury the truth itself as deeply as possible so few can ever find it.
You may say that older generations were "antiquated" and "the product of the Zeitgeist in which they were raised". BOLOGNA Joel! Was Jesus likewise? Was Jesus just a "confused racist who needed to repent of the immoral Zeitgeist by which His Mind was polluted?" He is the same yesterday, today, and forever Joel. Have you read that verse? Do you understand it? He is the Alpha and Omega—and Immutable. The alphabet is not "still evolving" Joel.
Take a look at society Joel. Do you study much? Do you even know what the world was like before so-called "Civil Rights"...? before the un-Civil War...? Have you ever studied crime statistics? Buy an almanac from 1920, 1940, and 2018 and do a little study Joel. Move out of your ivory palace into the ghetto. That will be even more enlightening. Move to Nairobi or Cairo or Baghdad. That will be an education you will never forget. Take your wife and kids. They'll have a wonderful time.
Civilization did not evolve Joel. It was developed by God's people alone because His Spirit is upon us and it has been destroyed to the degree that we have sinned against God and violated His Command to be separate. You are part of the Ichabod Church, Joel. The "Glory has departed" because those who profess to be His have gone a whoring after alien people, after the customs and ways, in violation of all that God commanded; so God's Spirit is no longer with them and that is why Christendom is being destroyed. Rather than call God's people to repentance, Joel, you are calling them to follow you deeper into the belly of the beast... deeper into Babylon... deeper into the Harlot Church.
When Christ returns He is not going to fluff the aura of the wicked Joel. Do you still believe in Hell? I guess believing in Hell is a moot point if you simply discard what God calls sin and therefore think that because you so decree it that God will not be able to use Hell (or in your mind, it will be full of Christian white racists and everyone else will be in Heaven). Why don't you preach against Black racists? Hispanic racists? Muslim racists? —who rape and murder THOUSANDS of white people every day throughout all of Christendom. Why do you denounce and attack God-fearing ministers who have never raped or lynched or murdered anyone and have no desire to...?
King David was a man after the Lord's Own Heart. David wrote: "21 Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate Thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against Thee? 22 I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies. 23 Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts: 24 And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting." (Psalm 139) God commanded, "Ye that love the LORD, hate evil" (Psalm 97:10) and Scripture tells us, "The fear of the LORD is to hate evil" (Proverbs 8:13). You call evil good and good evil; and you love what God hates and hate what God loves. Why is that Joel? Those who reject God's Decrees reject God.
Your notion of the south is polluted. Your notion of slavery in the U.S. is polluted. Were there some lynchings that were uncalled for? Certainly. There are sinful people who abuse others and act shamefully in every age and every society. But it was a truly Christian society back then. Was it perfect? Of course not. But it was 10 times better than the immoral cesspool in which we live today. The majority who were lynched deserved it; unless you think that blacks raping white women is perfectly acceptable, or deserves merely a slap on the wrist. Do you? What about the hundreds and thousands of stories across Christendom daily, like the 3 black women in Pennsylvania who beat the head in of an unsuspecting white man who was sitting at a gas station; because one of their young sons thought it would be fun to lie and say the man called him a racial name. Even had the man done so (which he did not, the gas station security camera shows they never talked to each other and the boy finally confessed that he made it up) he did not deserve having his head beat in with hammers, murdering him. While names may be offensive, it is not an injury. Words are not a crime. I do not promote insults or baiting; that is not the issue, so don't go off point. Another young white couple were kidnapped in Tennessee and abused and tortured over 3 days and murdered. Things like this go on every single day throughout Christendom—nonwhite on white crime. The majority of crimes referred to as being committed by whites are not; they are mixed breeds, often part black or hispanic, who consider themselves white because they don't want to be considered black or hispanic; but that does not make them white—but the crimes are falsely blamed on whites. Regardless, you choose to attack peaceful preachers of the Gospel who hold to traditional morality, and ignore the tens of thousands of rapes and murders against white people by nonwhites. Why is that Joel? You are not a shepherd, but a swine-herder, or a shepherd who has a secret deal with the wolves.
People used to leave their doors unlocked Joel. They left their car keys in the car. New Yorkers for many decades now have had multiple locks on their doors (some have a half dozen or more on one apartment door), as well as security cameras, security guards, and an army of police. Yet crime is worse. Why? —because of what Pastor Weaver and McCurry believe about mixed-marriages being unbiblical? Is that what causes all those nonwhites to commit hundreds of thousands of crimes a year? Why do people have so many locks on their doors Joel? They aren't afraid that white people are going to home invade, rob, rape, and murder. It didn't use to be like this Joel. Did you ever see the tv show Marbury R.F.D. / The Andy Griffith Show? Yes, it was a tv show; but that is what society used to be like. Now the cities of Christendom are like Back to the Future III or Batman Returns or Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, which depict darkness and festering evil and an overbearing feeling of oppressive terror. Do you think that is "progress", Joel? It is happening to cities across Europe and the U.S. who hardly knew crime—and all of the sudden with the massive influx of Third-world aliens, violent crime is off the charts, yet the only thing that is denounced is the "white racists" who are so evil to believe that they have the right to the godly, peaceful society that their ancestors developed and passed on to them and that it is immoral to turn their nations over to the savages and force the true citizens to pay welfare so the aliens can live and breed at taxpayer expense as they destroy civilization.
You are a destroyer. You are assisting in the rape of the bride of Christ and the genocide of God's children. You think the Master will be so pleased when He returns and finds His children on the top of the table breeding with the dogs. I think you will have a rude awakening. One who does the very opposite of what Christ commanded and who works against Him (by scattering the flock or having the sheep breed with the wolves)* is called an ENEMY. Christ said that when He returns He will command the holy angels, "bring those Mine enemies that would not that I should rule over them and slay them before Me". You reject Christ's rule when you adopt the world's "morality" and you reject and denounce the morality that God commanded as "evil", of which you think that white Christians need to "repent"—and you encourage abominations that God forbade! Christ said MANY on that Day will say, "but have we not done all these wonderful things in Your Name?" and Christ will reply, "I never knew you. Depart from Me ye that work iniquity [lawlessness; anonmia**]" (Matthew 7:23).
[* "6 My people hath been lost sheep: their shepherds have caused them to go astray, they have turned them away on the mountains [large nations]: they have gone from mountain to hill [small nations / people], they have forgotten their restingplace. 7 All that found them have devoured them: and their adversaries said, We offend not, because they have sinned against the LORD, the habitation of justice, even the LORD, the hope of their fathers." (Jeremiah 50)
** Those who reject God's Law are guilty of lawlessness Joel. There is only one source of morality: The Word of God—everything that He declared, "Thou shalt not" and "This shalt thou do". It has nothing to do with salvation. It has to be with being honorable sons who love and obey their Father. You are more like Absalom. How did Absalom honor his father? That's what you are doing to the Family of God and that is how you honor your Heavenly Father. The Hebew names Absalom and Solomon are very similar. Solomon at least started out holy and honorable. Absalom didn't have a very "peaceful" ending.]
Morality does not change Joel. What God declared to be abominations 3,500 years ago still were 3,000 years later when the tiny remnant returned from Babylon. What God declared to be sin and abominations 3.500 years ago still are are today. God does not change. You do understand what the word Immutable means, don't you? He declared the difference between good and evil, and placed a curse on those who would call evil good and good evil. That curse has landed on YOU Joel.... unless YOU repent. Morality does not change. Evil never becomes good. Abominations never become wholesome and wonderful. Homoperversion is following the EXACT SAME PATH that interracial copulation and "marriage" followed. Interracial marriage results in "confusion". That is the meaning of Babylon. God commands His people to be separate and to come out!
Regardless, the unspoken, maybe even unwitting underlying philosophy that you are spewing is that all whites should collectively throw themselves on the genetic hand-grenade to save the Negro (or Hispanic or other non-white) platoon! They are improved by breeding up. But will never make them "the same" and if all are the same why do they need to "breed up" to improve? and if they don't need to breed up to improve then why do you promote it? You've never really spent much time outside your ivory tower, have you? You'd be a good politician. You already are one; except that you deceitfully practice your dark art within the cover of the church.
Darker colored blacks hate lighter colored blacks and that is what the entire genocide of 700,000 lighter blacks in Uganda / Ruanda was all about in 1994. But allowing the blacks to "breed up" destroys the whites—and God forbade it. Colonial preacher Joel Hawes said, "Those who disparage a good ancestry are those who have none of their own". God does not tell us to get down in the gutter and become whores just so whores can feel better about themselves and not have someone better than themselves to cause them envy. This is what you are promoting. Immorality. Those who enter the sheepfold by any means other than the door is a thief and a robber. It's is not grass that is valuable and to be guarded against being stolen, but the sheep! You have dug under the wall or busted a whole through it and you are letting the dogs and swine and wolves into the sheepfold. You are not a blind shepherd or even an evil shepherd—you are a swine-herder and a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Not only does Joel ignore the fact that God created each after its own kind, he also ignores the Fall and he also ignores the outright decretive declarations of God concerning whom He FOREVER cursed. Joel and others (malicious or sincere) ASSUME that all races sprung from Adam and / or Noah, when it is a genetic impossibility. They assume but they have no Biblical support. However, the Hebrew meaning of the word Adam is itself support that Adam is not the father of all races. Eve was not the mother of all living (all creatures did not spring out of her womb), but the mother of all living souls from Adam, "Kind After Kind". It's not just skin deep, Joel; do a little study.
God said that He separated His people from all other peoples even as He separated clean from unclean animals.
"24 ... I am the LORD your God, which have separated you from other people. 25 Ye shall therefore put difference between clean beasts and unclean, and between unclean fowls and clean: and ye shall not make your souls abominable by beast, or by fowl, or by any manner of living thing that creepeth on the ground, which I have separated from you as unclean. 26 And ye shall be holy unto me: for I the LORD am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be mine." (Leviticus 20)
Understand, clean and unclean animals did not "evolve" from the same ooze. God separated them in the very act of creation by making them different; their not sharing a common origin other than the basic minerals and gases of the elements from which all life was formed. So also did He with peoples.
Noah was pure in his genealogies / generations. God did not turn Ham black. God did not even curse Ham; though Ham's sin was reprehensible (see my What Was the Mark that God Placed on Cain?, 584pp., 30.00 + P&H). Canaan was cursed because he was born of incest; he then married a woman descended from Cain. Scripture says that God set the bounds of the nations / peoples. God forbids hybridization of crops, animals, and even mixing of fabric and clothing, or yoking an ox and an ass.
Your assertion that the term inter-racial is "more properly" inter-ethnic is another assertion also based on false, unsupported, unstated presupposition and false assumption that all races descend from Adam. A point that you have nowhere attempted to prove. You belch out opinion and the Word of God is nowhere in sight.
You are helping our own destruction thinking it pleases Jesus, while interpreting the Bible through the polluted notions of an evil world that hates God. You need to have your mind renewed. Why don't you move to a Third World nation and spread the love over there? Christendom has enough enemies. If you think Third World evangelism fulfills the Great Commission why are you here enjoying the luxuries of Christendom? Why aren't you giving your life for the dogs? That is a bit hypocritical when you expect all the white people in Christendom to simply breed ourselves out of existence and give 6,000 years of our heritage and inheritance to the aliens with whom God forbade that we have any dealings. Do you hate your ancestors that much Joel? How is that honoring your father and mother? Cursed is he that setteth light by (treats lightly, as insignificant) his father and mother.
Tell me where you learned theology. Tell me which theologians have warped your thinking to cause you to believe that God abolished His Law, that God changed, that God's Word does not endure forever, that the world dictates morality not the Word of God, that morality "changes" and that sin becomes "non-sin", that evil becomes good and abominations become wonderful, that darkness becomes light, that pigs become sheep and serpents become dove and tares become wheat. Who's your sugar daddy? Was it more than 30 pieces of silver? You do realize that silver or gold will melt in the fervent heat, do you not?
The fact that you even called your article "Color Line" itself shows profound ignorance. Color is merely one of the many differences between the races.
Someone emailed me the following. I assume it was an email and not an article at a website. I searched to find it online but I did not find it anywhere. Someone also sent me a link (www.facebook.com/groups/ThePostmilReport/permalink/1876224306001812/">https://www.facebook.com/groups/ThePostmilReport/permalink/1876224306001..." target="_blank">www.facebook.com/groups/ThePostmilReport/permalink/1876224306001812/">https://www.facebook.com/groups/ThePostmilReport/permalink/1876224306001...). The link did not work for me, I assume that it is the below article, but I cannot be certain.
Joel McDurmon, Once Repudiating Social Justice, Now Promotes It
[The above article has some good points, but appears to be profoundly near-sighted in not understanding the nature and perpetuity of the Law of God; which itself is due to a defective, humanistic understanding of God Himself. The Apostle John, in one of the last books of the New Testament to be written (written even after Revelation), says, "He that saith, I know Him, and keepeth not His Commandments, is a liar, and the Truth is not in him." (I John 2:4) Rejection of God's Law (which includes racial separation) is the reason for all the immorality in Christendom. Rejection of God's Law is why Christendom is about to be destroyed: For God will not hear the prayers (much less receive the worship) of those who turn their ear from hearing His Law (Proverbs 28:9) and who regard iniquity in their hearts (Psalm 66:18)—whether out of ignorance or wilful rebellion. R.A.B.]
also, someone emailed the following:
Joel wrote to Pastor Weaver:
"I would be willing to meet with you and McCurry, with witnesses, on a couple conditions. First, you publicly repent of your position on interracial marriage, and then show fruit of repentance (public apologies, etc.). Second, we record the meeting. Any further negotiation can start there."
—and to whom should Pastor Weaver pray for forgiveness...? to Joel? How can one "repent" of a sin when no "thou shalt not" or "this shalt thou do" has been established? Joel has given no verse from the Bible that says interracial marriage is a command from God, that it is permissible, or that it is not a sin. It is presumption and sin for Joel to declare that interracial marriage is not sin, when no verse supports Joel's position. In fact, God declares a curse on those who would add to or subtract from His Law. Joel's declaration is also sin because Scripture tells us that which is not of faith is sin—and faith is founded upon the Doctrine of the Word of God, not the evil world's dogmatic opinion of what "right" and "wrong" are. Does Joel believe homoperversion is not a sin either? Both interracial marriage and homoperversion have been considered immoral for millennia by Christian society and by the Old and New Testament upon which those Christian societies were based.
I've been in frequent communication with Pastor Weaver for over a decade, and read his works and watched his videos a decade before that. Pastor Weaver demonstrates the Grace of a person regenerated through Christ and it is evident from talking with him for even a few minutes. From only a few sentences that Joel writes, I get the impression that he is a papal bully. He's been given a little power by being elected to the small (?) organization of which he is president (even though some claim that he is undermining the doctrine upon which it was founded*). He does not appear to be a Presbyterian (I haven't heard him quote John Knox or the Westminster Confession of Faith), nor does he appear to understand Reformed doctrine (and he seems to reject much of what R. J. Rushdoony taught). He appears to be one who creeps in unawares to steal and destroy. "By their fruit ye shall know them." If he understood God's Holiness and Immutability then he should know that God cannot change and what God declared to be sin and abominations 3,500 years ago still are sin and abominations today. God's Law goes further back than Sinai (that was merely the first codified, written, giving of the Law to God's people as a collective group). God Law goes all the way back to Abraham, Noah, and Adam. That very same Law had been transmitted orally from God to Adam and then from the Patriarchs to their families; with periodic updates from God as man degenerated more and more and required being commanded not to do what he knew in his heart was wrong**). God forbade us to cross-breed animals or crops. Are God's very children of less importance than cows and cowpeas? Are sheep and sheep sorrel more holy that God's very children? I see that Pastor Weaver quotes liberally from the Bible in his emails (as in this initial reply to Joel McDurmon after Joel's first article attacking Pastors Weaver, Curry, and Hammond: http://sacredtruthministries.com/articles/pastor-john-weaver-responds-jo..." rel="bookmark">Pastor John Weaver responds to Joel McDurmon), but liberals don't seem to quote the Bible, especially when their position is indefensible.
** Cain was not executed because God had not yet commanded "thou shalt not kill". Cain knew that what he had done was wrong (even though God had not commanded it) or he would not have hid the body or lied to God. God purposely did issue that particular Commandment until after Cain's offense, because "though it must needs be that offenses come into the world, woe unto him by whom the offenses come". In order for God's Prophecy of "perpetual warfare" between the seed of the woman and the seed of the Serpent to be fulfilled, Cain had to survive and have offspring. God often has us learn the hard way. Jacob marrying Leah and Rachel turned out to be very troublesome, so after that God declared a a man was not to marry a woman and her sister at the same time. Similarly, sibling marriages were permissible in the times of the early Patriarchs; and by Abraham's time half-sibling marriages were permissible. However, due to the cumulative effect of genetic anomolies, after a certain time, that became destructive to the genes, God later declared in His Law how close within the family marriages can be (and the same Law forbids marrying outside the race). For more details, see What Was the Mark that God Placed on Cain? —Including: “The Cain-Canaan Connection,” “What Was Ham’s Sin?” “Why Was Canaan Cursed?” “Where Was Eden?” “Where Did Cain Get His Wife?” “How Did the Descendants of Cain Survive the Flood?” ...and other curious things in Scripture considered,, 584pp., 30.00 + P&H; Who Was the Serpent in the Garden? and the Waters that Covered the Earth, 774pp., 40.00 + P&H and Ten Commandments for Youth, 440pp., 6.25 x 9.25, pb., 25.00 + P&H. See also, Was Abraham’s Wife Sarah His Half-Sister?, 60pp., 5.00 + P&H.]
Though unrelated to the primary topic of this article, the following excellent article also sheds some light on the destruction of Christendom: http://donboys.cstnews.com/biola-university-has-slipped-into-the-slim-pi..." target="_blank" style="color: #0096ef; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">http://donboys.cstnews.com/biola-university-has-slipped-into-the-slim-pi... —I imagine Reuben Torry is before the Throne of God Almighty now crying out, "How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?" (Revelation 6:10) Dr. Torrey was not martyred—but his institution has been! And all other Christian schools, colleges, universities, institutes, academies, and seminaries are under the very same assault while the majority of "Christians" don't even raise an eyebrow and go back to watching criminals play with a ball in the Superbowl. Christ said those who deny Him before man, He will deny them before His Father. Each time "Christians" see evil and SAY NOTHING they DENY CHRIST. Each time "Christians' remain silent and passive when Christ would have spoken out and been active, THEY DENY CHRIST.
Someone also emailed me the following. Pastor Weaver is the one who is not smoking the foot-long cigar.