Here are some links about France and the mosques.
France is thinking of shutting down all mosques due to continued rise of violent murders by Muslims.
You can’t just close mosques... you have to expatriate the mosqueteers... otherwise, they will simply go underground, feign conversion, just like the Jews did for centuries; just like the first “test” batch of Muslims did over half a century ago. Every nation of Europe is having the same problem; and it is not because Europeans are “racist”—but because Africans and Middle Easterners and Muslims are savages. Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland, Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, etc.—wherever the aliens go rape, murder, arson, vandalism, brutal assault, theft, and other violent and subversive crime SKYROCKETS. The modern Arabs and Persians have very little legitimate relation to their original progenitors the sons of Abraham, Ishmael through Hagar and probably Zimran* through Keturah.
[* The meaning of Zimran’s name, I believe, is terribly misunderstood; even as the name of Cain’s descendent Jubal, (Genesis 4:21), who I believe did not create musical instruments, but weapons of war (“handle” means, “wield” and thus instead of harp and organ (pipes) possible bow (the kind that shoots arrows) and blowgun may be intended. The reason being, Abraham’s other sons through Keturah have war-like names (Medan’s name means, “discord, strife”; Jokshan, “insidious”; Shua,* “to sink, abase”; Midian, “brawling, contention”; Ishbak, “he will depart”), as do other descendents of Cain, so it seems quite unlikely if “musical ability” is intended, since music calms the savage beast and these were not godly men. Since Abraham’s son Medan was father of the Medes in Media, then it seems likely that Zimran, whose name means, “to strike” (not necessarily in a musical fashion, though that is one meaning) lived in the nearby region and was in close association with Medan. However, it is also possible that the Persians descended from Shem’s son, Elam, father of the Elamites. Shem’s other sons, also, were war-like, Aramaens, Chaldeans, Assyrians. It should also be noted that quite likely the Persians were not originally descended from one family, but were a confederation; and thus it could have been a confederation of Elamites and Zimranites.
* This Shuah also probably clears up another mystery. Judah did not marry a Canaanite, but a woman living in Canaan. Judah’s son by her, who survived, was Shelah. Shelah’s offspring was counted among the tribes of Israel—which they would not have been had Judah’s wife been a Canaanite. Judah’s name was Bathshua, which means, “daughter of Shuah”. According to my Coordinated Chronological Table of the Patriarch’s, Judah sired his firstborn by Bathshua when Judah was around 20 years old. This would have been 93 years after Abraham died. However, Shuah is the last mentioned of Abraham’s 6 sons by Keturah (Zimran was first mentioned; this does not mean that he was firstborn, though he could have been, but the most-prominent). Abraham took Keturah as wife a few years after the death of Sarah, after Isaac took Rebekah as his wife, sometime after when Abraham was 140 years old. Since Abraham was in no hurry, in advanced age, his 6th son by Keturah could have been born 12 years after the marriage, when Abraham was 152. Before Abraham died at the age of 175, he sent all his sons by Keturah away, into the East country, which was a name for the land east of where Eden had been situated, in north of the highland plateaus of Syria, in far northeast Mesopotamia. Thus, the time that Judah sired his firstborn by Batheshua would have been roughly a year after he took her as his wife, 92 years after Abraham died. This means that, if Bathshua was 18 years old when Judah took her to wife, that she would have been born when her father Shua was 62. This is quite within the realm of possibility, since Abraham sired his firstborn by Keturah around the age of 141. Why was Bathshua back in Canaan, if she was Shuah’s daughter? The Israelites at times took their wives from the original stock. God had Abraham send his other sons away because they would have been rivals with Isaac. But daughters could certainly be sent back to find prospective husbands, and the sons of Jacob would have been good prospects, since Jacob, before the famine and before going down into Egypt, was a very wealthy man. See also my, S.T.E.C. on Genesis and Judges.
The prophecy against Ishmael was that he would be a wild-ass of a man, his hand against every man and every man’s hand against him—it seems that this was fulfilled by his intermarrying with corrupt peoples; even as the prophecy against Esau was fulfilled because Esau, likewise, married vile people and so his hybrid Canaanite descendents were cursed as well as having the additional prophetic curse upon them—they indeed would be successful, but ruthless and rapacious. The Turks are themselves the Hittite-Canaanites, who also intermarried with other cursed peoples, as well as with the savage Nubian preadamites of Africa. The Egyptians (who were pure descendents of Ham; despite Ham’s sin of defiling his own mother, it was the inbred offspring Canaan alone who was cursed; Ham was not “turned black”, nor were any of his sons black), as the Philistines, Cushites (original Ethiopians) and other descendents of Ham were pure Adamites—and like their cousins descended from Shem and Japheth, were pure Caucasians (the common person did know that Moses was not an Egyptian, even though he was an Israelite; and before him, when Joseph was raised to be Prince of Egypt, his own brothers did not recognize him because Egyptians shaved their heads and faces and body hair; but most of the Egyptians did not know that Joseph was not an Egyptian—so the Hebrew and original Egyptian racial type was nearly identical; also before the Israelites entered Egypt, Egypt had been ruled by the Hyksos or “Shepherd Kings” who were Aramaens, descendents of Shem’s son Aram).
After the Israelites left Egypt in ruins, Egypt having lost all their slaves, it was then, I believe, that the Egyptians imported Nubian slaves from Sub-saharan Africa to rebuild their nation, and eventually the Egyptians began interbreeding with them, as well as with Turks and Arabs. Sometime between the rule of David and Solomon Pharaoh of Egypt gave his wife’s sister to an Edomite prince; so clearly, the Egyptians casually began marrying corrupt peoples.
The “Syrians” (more properly, Aramaens) were pure kinsmen to the Israelites; however, in Solomon’s day an Edomite prince, Hadad (who had lived with Pharaoh for several decades), by conspiracy overthrew the Syrian empire and made himself king. After that, the kings of Syria (including 3 named Ben-hadad, “son of Hadad”) were Edomite-Canaanites. As in every nation they infiltrate, the Edomites bring more Edomites in to take over all areas of society; so that, most likely, the modern “Syrians” are probably completely corrupt, with Edomite and other cursed blood, with little relation to the original Aramaens (“Syrians”).]
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
It will cause a violent reaction and an increase in terrorism and crime. When a trout is thrashing frantically in the water, it is often trying to dislodge parasites who refuse to be dislodged.
[60% of France's prisoners are already Muslim... what is that costing the nation in the crimes they committed, police, court costs, and the cost to warehouse them? ... in addition to welfare fraud... (a government-sponsored, tax-payer funded breeding program of France’s internal enemies)... why are people SO blind? The very same situation exists in all formerly white Christian nations: Aliens are not fit for civilization so why are they invited into Christendom and put on a breeding program? —it is the plan to destroy us and well has it worked... Christians now cower and whites are afraid to say anything or lose their jobs.
Pittsburgh TV anchor says she was fired for being white.
This is not even the tip of the iceberg. It is white-collar terrorism and reverse discrimination and it is High Treason, Sedition, and the Muslim and homo hijacking (grand theft and kidnapping) of the entire nation from its rightful citizens. How much is a city like Philadelphia worth? its land, infrastructure, homes, businesses, parks, cultural / historical monuments...? How many trillions? Well every single major city and most smaller ones have been stolen outright from those who built them... and given to hostile aliens. Some people are able to sell before the neighborhood goes to hell, but most lose their shirt when property values plummet and the neighborhoods are no longer safe to live in... and they become ghetto slums (nonwhites are not given ghetto-slums—they turn wherever they move en masse into ghetto-slums). It is Grand Theft on the largest-possible scale and politicians who create that situation by alien immigration and welfare programs are accomplices in that Grand Theft and are guilty of High Treason and the violation of their oath of office. The only loyalty of a U.S. politician (public servant) is to the rightful people of the U.S. Aliens have no “rights”, only privileges which can be revoked at any time. Fraud has no statute of limitations. That which began fraudulently can never be legitimized, whether B-HO’s fake presidency or 8 generations of illegals being born here even if they are at some point declared “legal” or “naturalized” or “natural born” citizens. They are not. It is fraud. If my parents had broken into Donald Trump’s penthouse when my mother was pregnant and I had been born in Donald Trump’s living room, would I then become an heir to the Trump fortune? Would Trump be required to pay my bills for the rest of his life? What if my parents had broken into a bank vault and had me born there? It is stupidity that criminals can break into a sovereign nation, have a baby, and be considered lawful citizens. It is fraud. It is illegitimate. They are not lawful citizens even after 100 generations. If US politicians violate the U.S. Constitution and import aliens and “declare” them to be “citizens” it is likewise just as much a fraud as if the night-time security guard at the bank opened the vault and told you that you could have as much money as you wanted. He has no right to do that and it is a crime on the part of both the politicians as well as the illegals.]
Further, I assume that France is a member of the EU and if France attempts to close down all mosques, whether it deports the mooslims or not, most probably the Almighty EU would tell France you cannot do that and if you try the EU will go to war against you. If that plays out, there may be a chance that the EU could break up if other non-aggressive nations (Poland, Hungary, etc.) refuse to participate or they may even decide to join France’s side and many other nations might then bail out of the EU and it could collapse, unless communists (is that not what socialist-democrats are?) like Merkel try to hold it together to continue to destroy Europe. Also, with all the muslims and Africans in Europe now, one event can be the “falafal that breaks the camel’s back” and if you think that the rapes and murders showing their “appreciation” upon entering Europe are bad, imagine what they will act like when they are mad that their prophet has been blasphemed.
See also this link about Pretoria South Africa and imagine that all throughout Europe.
[not that Google can be trusted... but it will be interesting to see how it plays out, even as with France and their Muslim problem.]
If Britain evicted all the Muslims and other gimmi-grants / rapefugees and did not import or breed any more they would probably have a surplus of money to pay for services to the rightful Brits who have paid into the taxbase their whole lives (and don’t deserve to have their island and nation stolen from them) and who deserve their pension if they paid into it... and the pensions should be paid to the pensioners before the politicians’ salaries are paid... before tax money is used for any other thing because doing so would be fraud, treason, and grand theft. Furthermore, there would be no moral reason for anyone to continue paying a single shilling in tax if he knew that the government going to misspend it and give some of it to his enemies. If the government is not going to give back in services and pensions to those very legitimate Brits who paid for it and deserve those rightful services (not “benefits”) why should anyone pay taxes demanded of them by corrupt politicians and corrupt monarchy? Aliens and immigrants have no rights and deserve nothing. They are guests and have privileges only as long as they mind their manners and are allowed to stay under conditional terms for a limited period of time.
Thus, the threats of corrupt politicians wanting Britain to stay in the EU are vapid.
Why is it that common sense / morality cannot be understood?
God has sent strong delusion for His people to believe lies, and He has sent a spirit of cowardice because we have turned our backs on Him.
Any measure in Britain, France, the U.S., or any other nation of Christendom will merely be a band-aid or another pint of blood ritualistically given to a patient that is already bleeding out.
The issue, the only solution is to return to what our nations—our republics were founded upon, which worked for centuries and even millennia. Our nations were founded upon principles of natural law and morality all of which are derived from the Word of God... and all corruption is the result of spurious modern interpretations.*
[* —which are like a 2x4 no longer being 2" x 4" or a quarter-pounder hamburger not weighing 1/4 pound AFTER it is cooked... CROOKS continue to shave down the 2x4 smaller and smaller, and hamburger companies continue to add more fat, or if lowfat, they add more water, so that the frozen weight is 1/4 pound but it half evaporates when cooked (and water is cheap, but evaporated water is not very filling or nutritious) or half of the burger melts away in grease... but they charge you the same or even more. Just [honest] weights and measures is what God commanded; and not calling good evil and evil good.]
We must as Jefferson said, return to the ancient principles... the Common Law which was founded upon the Law of God, as clearly shown by Alfred the Great who codified Britain’s Anglo-Saxon Common Law of England, which was the basis for American Common Law.
[See: The Dooms of King Alfred (the laws, “domas”, from which we get words like domain, dominion, etc., of England established a.d. c.890 were based upon the Bible and God’s Law) 58pp., stapleback booklet, bilinear; one page is the Anglo-Saxon / Old English original, the other page is the English translation) 5.00 + P&H which I reprint; see also Origins of the Common Law (1966), Hoague, 272pp., Hb. 24.00 + P&H; pb. 14.00 + P&H or a more in-depth, A Concise History of Common Law (1929), Theodore Plucknett, 700+p. Hb. 8.5x11 50.00 + P&H or by another publisher 6x9 828pp., pb., 14.50 or Hb. 30.00 + P&H. Inquire.]
All modern corruption must be amputated and the nation restored as the Founders gave it to us—to us their posterity... not to the posterity of our enemies. Is China giving its nation to Africa or Islamabad? Is Turkey giving its nation to Germany? Is Iraq giving its nation to Sweden? Is Mexico giving its nation to the U.S.? Why is it a one-way street?
In nonwhite, nonchristian lands, this would not even be an issue. They would do what they are doing and have been doing and will continue to do as we turn a blind eye. They would simply kill foreigners / christians and that would solve the issue once and for all.
They would demonize our evicting and sending back to their country of origin all aliens and their offspring; yet their killing is a nonissue.
[Furthermore, those expatriated from the U.S., France, Britain should not be rei-mbursed for any properties they have in our nations, for they only have those properties from having been leeches off our taxpayers and from having defrauded our people... (not even counting the cost of tax dollars for education, hospitalization, or the massive crime, prison population, police and court costs, etc.) and if they try to destroy property that they cannot take with, then they should be put to hard labor until their debt is paid off, or executed—their choice (unless they have someone in their country who would redeem them and pay their debt).]
Those Poor Indians and Slaves...
The Indians of North, Central, and South America simply exterminated the previous inhabitants... yet we have subsidized them for over a century.... yet we are the bad guys. The same issue and facts exist in regard to slavery. Less than 5% of the slave population ended up in white countries... and white nations were civilized and gave the blacks better lives as slaves than what they would have had “free” in their own nations. Nonwhite nations bought 95% of the black slaves, yet whites are the bad guys. Jews, Arabs, Turks, and Blacks themselves dominated the slave trade for millennia, and only a few whites were involved in it for a century or so, yet whites are the bad guys. Less than 3% of U.S. white Southerners owned slaves, yet all white are blamed and we all have paid for it for over 100 years. IS EVERYONE THAT STUPID? White colonies in Haiti, South Africa, Congo, Somalia, etc., were all prosperous and safe, and once overthrown or given up, they all reverted to hell holes. And they are doing the same to our nations. Where will it end someone asked me? God is sending judgment on His people (true peoples of Christendom) until they are all either dead or repenting.
John Eidsmoe, on page 286 of in his [rather liberal, in my opinion] book, Columbus and Cortez: Conquerors For Christ (1992), quotes John Greenway from his article “Will The Indians Get Whitey?” from the National Review, March 11, 1969 who wrote,
“A Polynesian chief once observed to a white officer: I don’t understand you English. You come here and take our land and then you spend the rest of your lives trying to make up for it. When my people came to these islands, we just killed the inhabitants and that was the end of it.”
This stark confession is unknown to most people. The so-called American Indians (north, central, and south), killed each other incessantly, exterminating each other and dispossessing their predecessors from their land (taking survivors of war as their slaves, whom they tortured and/or executed at will for their amusement, even as African tribes routinely did). The white man claimed unused virgin forest land (the indians were basically nomads, travelling great distances north and south with the seasons; the indians no more owned the land than the bears and beavers did). While the indians may have owned their camps and the land that they cleared, they certainly did not own all land that their foot ever trod, nor all the forests and mountains or bodies of water. The indians warred against each other and killed each other and took the lands of their vanquished fellow indians. So why is it that the white man is so demonized? only because as God commanded true Israel concerning the Canaanites, to exterminate them to the last or they will be a thorn in your flesh and pricks in your eyes all your days that you dwell in the land. Our crime was being too humane. While there were some wicked whites, they were the exception, and rarely did whites simply go on the warpath for no reason at all. Those who became indian killers like Tom Quick and Jeremiah Johnson only did so after their entire family had been massacred without any provocation. The indians routinely for many generations exterminated each other—and many (if not all) tribes were cannibals who ate their victims.
[I reprint The Original Life and Adventures of Tom Quick and two others with stories of many people, including Tom Quick (Legends of the Shawangunk and True Stories of Our Pioneers). They and other books mentioned below also explain the historical picture, not the glorified, romanticized, fictionalized version of the “noble savages” of modern media and schoolbooks. See: Captured By The Indians: 15 Firsthand Accounts, 1750-1870, Drimmer and any six of the books in Allan Eckert's Narrative Series of the American Frontier, though the first, The Frontiersman, is the best. I stock these fascinating books, inquire for more details or search STM’s website or see the book list.]
However, more compelling and profound than this, is the fact that the indians were not the first inhabitants of North America. The indians exterminated and stole the land from the earlier Celts, Vikings, Iberians, and Phoenicians who previously inhabited portions of the U.S. before the indians arrived or spread to those localities. The “American” “Indians” themselves originally confessed this—back when they admitted the truth; which they don’t now. Now they realize that the white man’s cowardice and his general good nature can be preyed upon. Now they hide the truth and lie (and like other civilizations—if they can be called that—that are based upon lies, the majority of the population don’t even know the truth and were raised believing lies). In the past they bragged about their past “exploits”—until they learned that pretending to be “noble savages” and “exploited” and “wronged” was a mega cash cow! Originally, they followed the right of ownership based on might; but now they pretend to have been peaceful children of nature who coexisted with all other peoples and respected “mother earth” until the evil white men came upon them like a pack of wolves upon Bambi and for no reason other than “fear” and “jealousy” and “greed” massacred the poor indians and stole their land. They are simply projecting how they themselves treated their own people, North, Central, and South America for centuries. The early indian confessions related that the people from whom they took the land were a light-skinned, blue-eyed people. It was the same people who developed the civilizations of the Aztecs and Incas above crude barbarism.
[See: In Search of Quetzalcoatl: The Mysterious Heritage of American Civilization [originally published in German, 1963, then English in 1964 under the title, In Quest of the White God by Pierre Honore, pseud. for Oliver Coburn; Ursula Lehrburger (translator) 228pp., pb., 17.00 (reg. 19.00) + P&H. All books mentioned herein are in stock.]
Dr. Barry Fell, in his three books, America B.C., Saga America, and Bronze Age America, aptly demonstrates that the Vikings, Scythians, Phoenicians, Gaels, etc. were in America as early as 800 B.C.—long before the Indians arrived.
[America B.C. was presented to White House in 1977 by the American Booksellers Assoc., as one of the 250 best books published in U.S. between 1973 and 1977. Dr. Fell was Emeritus Professor of Harvard University, President of the Epigraph Society, and editor / co-author of 8 volumes on decipherments of ancient manuscripts. He was considered one of the experts in this area. I stock America B.C. and can get the others; inquire.]
More recently, in June of 1997, a Canadian newspaper printed an article written by Tunku Varadarajan [presumably a Hindu, eastern Indian?] which had originally been written for the London Times. The article starts out accusing the federal authorities of having been suppressing “politically inconvenient” evidence proving the first Americas were not the so-called American Indians, but “Caucasoid” people from Europe. Douglas Preston, a distinguished American science writer, leveled this accusation in the New Yorker magazine, disclosing the findings of a reportedly 9,300-year-old [the dating method or estimate is clearly twice as old as it most probably was, though far-older than any indian remains] skeleton called, “Kennewick Man”* (which is now “safe”—safe from Americans finding out about it—last known to have been in an army vault in Washington State, but like the contents of Fort Knox, it has probably “walked off”).
[* So named, because it was discovered near Kennewick, Washington.]
Archaeologists claim that it seems quite possible that the “Indians” originally dispossessed these white people from their land. This issue is so sensitive, and this evidence so damning of modern philosophy, so called anthropology, sociology, and fabricated history, Preston argues that the politicians running the U.S. government are intent on burying the skeleton forever—literally. A court case was at one time underway, pitting archaeologists against the government, was but a last-ditch effort by the former to prevent the skeleton being handed over to Indian groups for a “ritual burial” because American Indian groups claimed that testing the skeleton DNA to determine its race is just “another way to rob Native Americans of their history.” [So, just like the demolition of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, and selling off the evidence from 9-11, a ceremonial burial of the truth is inevitable.] Indians from an Umatilla tribe, irrationally and dishonestly “believed” that the skeleton was one of their ancestors and claimed ownership of it, rejecting the scientific dated proving it to be white man, because their word-of-mouth* Indian legend had told them that their people had been part of that land since the beginning of time (despite many “big, brave” indian tribes earlier having claimed to having killed the previous inhabitants and having taken their land from them). Anatole France expressed, “If fifty million people say a foolish thing it is still a foolish thing”. Just because people believe something—even if they have believed it for centuries—does not make it true. A civilization far-more ancient, that of China, likewise, discovered Caucasians in the desert. Over a period of about 16 years, Chinese archeologists in western China unearthed some 113 3,000- to 4,000-year-old (dated c.300 to 2000 b.c.) mummified bodies of Caucasian men, women, and children (perfectly preserved in the hot desert sand) at various burial sites ranging from the central Asian region of Xinjiang to northwest China.** Yet the oh-so wise American “Indians” who had no written language until white missionaries developed it for them, think that any ancient skeleton found on the American continent just has to be an Indian because that is what they want to believe (and all their welfare benefits, “reparations”, and casinoes would come to an end if the truth was generally known).
[* —which all intelligent people know is unreliable even short term, let alone over centuries among a people who developed no written language of their own; especially a people known not for their honesty, but their trickery.
** See: The Mummies of Ürümchi (2000), Barber, 256pp., pb. illustrated 18.00 + P&H. See Appendix C-4 of Uncovering the Mysteries of Your Hidden Inheritance, R.A. Balaicius. See also Discover magazine, April 1994, “The Mummies of Xinjiang” by Evan Hadingham.]
Scientists were able to get a court order to block the planned burial and the case was before the U.S. District Court in Oregon. The skeleton that had been locked in an Army vault while the trial ensued was eventually given to the Indians, who buried him in a secret place. Abominably and criminally, the U.S. government then buried the archaeological site where the skeleton was found under hundreds of tons of soil to “prevent erosion,” thus forever concealing further evidence. The site was expected to contain many more skeletons due to its location along a river bank.
Someone emailed and asked:
“Robert, This EU thing is v v big in its ramifications. The stranglehold is slipping in once Christian Europe. Do you think??”
I think Britain leaving might help others to leave even if the EU says that they don’t have the right to leave... (and Britain leaving the EU may help France stamp out the Muslim problem, since Britain probably would have been one of the main aggressors to help inforce EU sanctions / act of war against France if they were going to de-mosquify the nation. But France is so greatly mixed in population (centuries of Muslims from Morocco and Egypt) that their dislodging the parasites seems an impossible dream, even if they elected honest, nationalist, patriotic leaders. Now sadly, ironically, all that France would have to worry about would be Communist-Merkel’s Germany—not Germany itself, but the defacto Zionist-communist government of Germany, whose attitude toward France would be: Look, we are eagerly destroying our nation, you have no right not to destroy yours. Get with the program. The U.S. and all other white nations are likewise being Zionist-brainwashed into committing national suicide so that the savages can have all of Christendom.
I also think that it may even help Trump win, if people see (or at least think) that they can actually break away from the self-appointed, subversive, “powers that be”. Since Iceland, Poland, and Hungary have made nationalist moves of self-recovery, that could be a good sign that not everyone in Christendom has been drinking the Zionist-Kool-ade and is not willing to just roll over and die so the savages can have what our ancestors built.
I think there is no hope for Europe, or for the UK or the U.S. unless God’s people repent of their sins before God. Otherwise, they are simply trading one evil master for the next. They need to return to their roots and the Word of God upon which our civilization was founded.
David Cameron has resigned as Prime Minister after Britain voted to leave the European Union. ... in Swansea, which was expected to vote to remain, did little to dampen ...
Also interesting, between 8pm and midnight (when NYSE was closed) gold shot up from 1256.00 to 1360.00, which though only 8% does appear to be a hiccup (another glitch in the Matrix?); though since NYSE has opened it has dropped back to 1313.