One college professor, an uncommonly astute and broadly learned and talented PhD., replied:
Evergreen State is now getting justice.
Their enrollment is down more than 30% following this incident.
Even before this, they were already heading for the cliff. In the past ten years before, (diverse) enrollment had been up 2% but (diverse) faculty up 10% and (diverse) staff up 30%. Even Karl Marx taught that there are only two kinds of people in the world: direct producers of wealth, and everyone else (bureaucrats and government workers). They were obviously trying to get more black and Hispanic students and unfortunately it worked. Sow the wind and ye shall reap the wind.
A similar event at U Missouri three years ago has resulted in 33% enrollment drop and seven empty dorms.
Twenty years ago Clark Kerr chancellor of UCal was called up before a Senate committee and accused of using quotas for enrollment. He replied that of course he did, and if he didn't all 200,000 students in the UCal system would be Asians, is that what you want? The august senators quickly found reverse gear and backed out of this interrogation.
Later they told him that federal funds would be withheld if he did not approve coed dorms. To which he replied; "Well, I guess my job is now to provide football for the alumni, parking for the faculty, and sex for the undergraduates." The senators were not amused.
We need to shut down the DoE and the EPA and make some drastic cuts in the FBI, CIA and NSA.
My thoughts in reply:
Yes, 98% of the Federal gov't needs to be shut down; constitutionally / legally it is neither our wet nurse nor our dorm mother (nor Big Brother nor concentration camp commandant); it has encroached into the private sector and into the State and peoples' rights--and so has each State become a mini Fed-ocracy in its own right. That is the trickle down theory in practice; the immoral "pecking order": the godless, often subconscious mentality, "because those above me oppress and rob me, I will rob and oppress those beneath me". This is the sociopathic inverse of the Golden Rule / Royal Law ("the law of the Jungle" / "dog-eat-dog") and brings a bumper crop of the Law of the Harvest—and those who sow to the wind (that is, carelessly, foolishly, and in violation of all-known law) reap a whirlwind of destruction (tempest, hurricane, tornado). God lambasted His people frequently in the prophets and judged them for their oppression of those of their own kinsmen weaker than themselves (the "poor") and for their immorality in general, their violations of God's Commands (the only source of morality).
[However, Liberation Theology and other forms of communism have twisted Scripture into a perverted notion of the "not oppressing the strangers" as meaning that we should preserve, nurture, and breed "the stranger" and "enemy" among us to the point that they outnumber us—to ensure our own demise. God FORBADE integration or seeking the peace or prosperity, loving or doing good unto His enemies, or alien peoples. There are different types of "strangers" referred to in Scripture*, and context dictates who the stranger is IF one has sound theology and a mind that can think logically and realizes that God is Immutable and His Law, Morality does not change; and God will not contradict Himself. Our only "neighbour" and "brethren" and the ONLY "strangers" that we are to entertain are KINSMEN. Kinsmen strangers, kinsmen who have travelled from another area to live among us in an area different from their previous domicile, hometown, motherland. German philosopher Emmanual Cant had his roots in SCOTLAND. His ancestors moved to Germany. The Cant family, in Germany, were the ONLY type "strangers" that God authorized and God FORBADE alien strangers of every stripe. Anything else violates the Word of God and destroys the family. Those "Christians" who thus help destroy the family and help destroy Christendom, and help pollute the true faith will not fair too well on Judgment Day (even if they don't believe in Judgment Day).
* —and the world "world" is used in different verses to refer to entirely different elements in the world; and likewise, the word "gentiles" [nations / people] has been perverted—and anyone who confuses these words in their various applications as all being "the same" is a fool! and makes the Word of God of none effect, violates it, and helps destroy the people of God (and that makes them God's enemy, if they try to destroy God's family—whether they realize their crime or not; the result is the same). Only a fool, when reading any book, would think common pronouns, "you, your, thy, thine, thou, he, him, she, her, they, their, our, us, we, etc"—all refer to the same people! CONTEXT and a COMPETENT READING of the WHOLE story is what DICTATES to whom each pronoun refers. In one Bible verse the word "he" can refer to one of God's people; and in the next verse the word "he" can refer to one of God's sworn enemies. Even in the very same verse one pronoun (thou) can refer to God's people and another (them) can refer to God's enemies. Reading is not for the indolent. God expects us to put on our little thinking caps. Those who can't wrap their minds around that need to start over with simple sentences such as, "See Moses. See Moses run" and then when they get the hang of that they can move on to more complex sentences. And the MAJORITY of Christian "leaders" (or more properly, "Ditch Tour-guides") are fools who pervert the Word of God and invite dogs, swine, and wolves into the sheepfold, which only serves to destroy the sheep, God's children, Christ's bride. Yes, and they shall be rewarded for all the "wonderful things" they did in Christ's Name (which is BLASPHEMY on top of LAWLESS REBELLION to God's clear commands)—Christ shall declare, "I NEVER KNEW YOU" and have them cast into Hell. Politicians, "ministers", and educators are FOOLS and TRAITORS. All that is required is for a person to study what our society was like (in the U.S., Britain, Canada, Germany, Sweden, etc.) 100 years ago to see WHAT WAS THE CLIMATE and COMPOSITION of our nations to learn what was the actual cause of our GOLDEN AGES. But being brainwashed with communist propaganda and godless paganism (thinking it is "freedom" and "Christianity") they could not have a valid thought to save their lives. They think that ANYTHING—even the most absurd opposite to the truth—is the real answer and solution... they will fight to the death to deny the only true solution. They are the enemy of God, the enemy of faith, the enemy of freedom, the enemy of Christendom; all the while masquerading as if they are the deliverers and saviours.]
However, the Royal Law is only implementable when we are separate from aliens as God commanded. As I have long written, when 2 opposing sides meet in sport or battle and one side religiously follows a rigid set of rules and the other side follows no rules at all, the side that follows no rules at all will win every time (without outside intervention). Even our Founders knew this and in drafting our Constitution had this in mind: It was only for our people; they entertained no delusions of equality of all peoples, religions, political forms, or perverse genders (mentally deranged walking diseases).
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other.” —John Adams
When our Founders, and the Puritans and Pilgrims used the word "religion" they used it as a synonym for CHRISTIANITY, because unlike modern apostates who claim to be "Christians" and even Bible "experts", they obeyed God in "NO OTHER gods" and did not recognize any other "religion" as valid, and certainly not "equal".
[For evidence of this, see a book that I edited and reprinted: The Power of Prayer: The New York Revival of 1858 (1858) Samuel Prime, 237pp., pb,. retypset, notes by R.A. Balaicius; excellent shows moving of God’s Spirit upon His people when they truly seek Him; 16.50 + P&H. This is but one example. There are hundreds of books that could be read. All one has to do is read the writings of the Puritans and Founders IN CONTEXT (not in context with today's polluted society and notions—but THEIRS!) and it becomes perfectly obvious. This is how the U.S. Constitution is to be interpreted and how the Bible is to be interpreted—what it meant in the mind of the author at the time it was written; NOT what it "means" in the polluted mind of the degenerate liberals centuries and millennia later according to modern notions that function as a "step down" program to ween the nation off the U.S. Constitution and the Bible entirely, once it has been so polluted to the degree it is good for nothing, it will be scrapped entirely.]
Our Founders offered no rights to aliens or alien religions, but recognized that aliens were free to follow whatever they wanted in their own nations; not in ours. They established our nation for themselves and their posterity—not the posterity of aliens; not the posterity of our enemies. NEVER for a moment would they have thought about polluting their heritage with savages. Anyone who did so became a pariah—and rightfully so, as God commanded it; and such a person would be executed or exiled. They never imagined anyone would be so traitorous or moronic as to do such, which is national suicide; let alone that the majority would—and that is why they specifically gave us a Constitutional Republic and NOT a "Democracy". The majority is usually wrong because the majority is usually godless and confused and immoral. The moral realm mirrors the physical realm in that ENTROPY must be fought against continually. Those who sit in a rowboat in a stream without rowing and without and anchor will never maintain their position (and they will certainly not make any progress upstream)... they simply "go with the flow" wherever it carries them; which is always oblivion! Such is the fate of nations that turn from the truth and established morality and the Word of God. Democracy as a political party should have been outlawed from the very beginning as a subversive group, even as communism. Since our Founders rejected Democracy as a viable political system, why would they have allowed a Democratic Party? They would not have. Subversion began from the very beginning. This is no surprise, the Counter-Reformation was birthed on the heels of the Reformation itself.
Democracy is soft-communism; transitional communism. It is communism that merely operates under a different name. As I show in my A Bolshevik Primer, the entire political arena has had a SHIFT IN NAME (not in reality) to the right. What are merely factually Biblical and Constitutional conservatives are now called "right wing extremists", liberals are called, "conservatives", and communists are called "progressives". There has been an entire shift to the right IN TERMINOLOGY and those brainwashed in the public schools don't have a clue. They are all good little communists, ready to break down and cry or start a riot and murder and burn a city to the ground at a moment's notice—all over principles that they do not even understand and what they think they understand is completely fallacious.
It is a perverse fallacy of logic that dissimilar things can ever be equal. It is a mental and immoral myth. Equality is only meant to destroy us; as is perfectly demonstrated in this Evergreen communist fiasco. Once they have the numbers, intolerance and oppression is their modus operandi; and like all communist revolutions—morality, compassion, and truth have no place. Is it any wonder that the Democratic party is becoming hard communist and not the soft communist that they have been for 100 years? and the "Republicans" (RHINOS) are becoming "soft communists" as the Democrats used to be? Really there is very little distinguishing between them; not even counting all of McCain's conspiracies and treasons, he was a communist dictator, he did not represent his constituents who think that they elected him; he represented his moneybag handlers (See this Rumination (more links to be added): McCain — War "Hero" ...? Consider the Evidence not the Satanic Halo Polishers ). He was anti-constitutional and pro-federalist and federalism is socialism. The Bill of Rights (as I show in A Bolshevik Primer*)—because of traitorous politicians like McCain—has been completely supplanted (replaced) by the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto.**
[* A Bolshevik Primer — and the Planned Extermination of Christendom; exposes those behind Bolshevism and Communism and details the long-planned mongrelization of Christendom; 176 pages, pb., with 145 Illustrations, 14.50 + P&H.
** See also one of the companion-volumes to A Bolshevik Primer, a smaller book that I reprinted with additional information: - The Communist Manifesto (1848) [Originally titled: “Manifest of the Communist Party”] by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (56pp.) — with Illustrated Historical Introduction — & A Comparison of the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto, “Democracy,” and Marxist, Unconstitutional U.S. Law, with the Bill of Rights / the 10 Amendments to the Constitution and the 10 Commandments - also containing the Declaration of Independence, Common Law Citations, Court Rulings and Quotes on Freedom, added by Robert Alan Balaicius; Including photos, background information, and photos of these and more: Karl Marx, Philips Corporation family, Adam Weishaupt, Bernard Lazare, Winston Churchill, Dr. Oscar Levy, Maurice Samuel, Marcus Eli Ravage, Samuel Roth, Vladimir Lenin, David Ben-Gurion, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Harry Waton, Friedrich Engels, Moses Hess, Theodore Herzl, Jacob Schiff, Judah P. Benjamin, Albert Pike, John Wilkes Booth, Charles Booth, William Booth, Rabbi Isadore Loeb, Dimitry Manuilsky, 132pp. total, pb., 12.50 + P&H. Also exposes the Marxist roots of the modern banking conspiracy, and those who opposed it: quotes by Jackson, Jefferson, Madison, as well as several U.S. Presidents who spoke out against it and tried to stop it and were assassinated (Lincoln, Garrison, Kennedy).]
It will be great if the Evergreen "institution of learning" [cough, cough] FOLDS and does not receive any government "bail out" funding to keep it afloat... I hope it does not turn all black but folds. Why should a multi-million dollar institution that our people founded be given to the savages, as have the 100+ other (unconstitutionally) all black colleges in the US (WHITE students should be bussed into the college; no college should be all black; but in proportion to the demographics of the nation—and if whites don't want to go, then the colleges should be shut down). The Federal and State taxpayer money should be cut off from funding all these institutions. If the blacks want such institutions to continue, have them pay fair-market value to lawfully purchase the institutions (not steal them by conquest) and then fund the institutions themselves. Why are the afraid of equality? Why can't they demonstrate equality? All such institutions should have all tax money cut off (and big business and "charitable institutions" and "foundations" and those who donate to them should get ZERO tax break for donations—WOW, would THAT not CUT INTO "donations"...!). Why are our tax dollars funding our own demise? It is actually ILLEGAL (according to the perverted interpretation and corruption of our Constitution) to fund their anti-white "racism"—which is what these institutions promote and practice. United Negro College Fund? Thurgood Marshall Foundation? Bill Gates and Oprah Winfrey's scholarships to nonwhites only? —while Stephen Girard (founder of Girard Bank and College of Philadelphia) after 130 years or so after his death had his WILL overturned in court about 50 years ago! Where is the equality? I think people should have bumperstickers and billboards nationwide: "PROVE your "equality" — END ALL welfare and government funding of "minority" individuals, special interest groups, and foreign nations."
[(1750-1831) French-born U.S. self- made millionaire (richest man in America). He bought the ENTIRE U.S. debt of the War of 1812 and NEVER asked for it to be repaid—and THAT is how the corrupt politicians / judges repaid him. He established a college and scholarship fund exclusively for poor white orphan books of Philadelphia. A couple blacks a few decades ago took the college to court and his will was illegally overturned. Now his entire fortune has been stolen by aliens!]
Why do we (AT VERY GREAT COST) artificially sustain the insuperable myth of equality? If laws have to be passed and DRACONIAN legislation unconstitutionally passed to issue EDICTS declaring certain people "equal", clearly they are not equal but inferior. Why is the nonwhite world flooding to the white world? Why not the other way around? Centuries ago comparatively small groups of whites migrated to nonwhite lands (and vacant areas on nonwhite continents) and colonized those unstable nations, carved civilization out of the bare wilderness, and turned them into successful, prosperous, safe nations. Why did they need whites to make them a success? If the blacks of South Africa want their nation back, then everything that the whites have built should be bulldozed and the blacks handed a loin-cloth and a grass hut. Why when the whites left (even though the entire nation was handed to them, fully developed, infrastructure, productivity) did all former nonwhite nations that were raised to civilization as colonies then invariably and completely fall apart—and continue to need billions of dollars of aid and periodic military intervention?
Why then have TRILLIONS of dollars been spent to maintain the myth of equality both home and abroad? It is not so much to maintain the myth (though that is important in the early stages); the myth is a mere diversion. The real plan is the taxpayer-funded breeding program to assure that the savages outnumber us in our own lands, slowly change our own laws to persecute us, and then eventually, as is happening—steal our entire nations (and now all of Christendom) out from under us (and to them, "reparations" will be a word erased from the dictionary); after which there will be no "minority rights" (once we are officially recognized as the minority; we have been the factual minority in the U.S. since the 1980s; but to have admitted it would have required whites to received preferential treatment, and the plan was to keep milking the cow until it dies). Once the change is made public, the law of the jungle, sharia law, full-blown talmudic and so-called Noahide laws, african dictatorships, bandito justice, etc., will become the "rule of law". God help us! God send a pestilence!
Now consider this.
The dictator of California is attempting to pass a law where all businesses in the state who do not have at least one female on the board of directors will be DRACONIANLY fined (hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars) and other hamstringing PUNISHMENTS until they "comply". This is unconstitutional, it is oppression, it is theft, it violates the right to contract. California is an important state, because it is actually about 3 states in 1 and it can produce a lot of food in the south; and that is why Florida, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico have also been subverted. The cities everywhere are overburdened. That has been done on purpose (even as aliens have been imported to fill our cities and slowly kill our people off—murders which people hardly blink at but which amount to many thousands—even tens of thousands every year; all while at the same time the aliens outbreed us (mostly at our expense) us about 8:1. It is setting all things in place for the "perfect storm". Cities grow ZERO food. A large percentage in cities live off welfare; parasites, not producers. Cities cannot feed themselves. Cities cannot sustain life without food. Take away our Southern States and the north cannot feed itself--not in the gross overblown populations that now infest them, the vast majority all aliens who do not share our way of life or rule of law or faith. Take away the deepest south like S. Fla., Southern Cal., Southern Texas, and we are even more hamstrung. This reveals the long-term plot to overthrow the nation begun in the Civil War, which unconstitutionally destroyed states' rights and instituted the Fed-ocracy.
It would be wonderful to let Cal. or Fla. secede from the nation—but WHY SHOULD WE give OUR STATES that our ancestors and people gave their lives to built out of the wilderness to the SAVAGES? Expatriation of aliens is the cure; not secession. But that will not happen because the institutions of learning have lobotomized and brainwashed 3 or 4 entire generations with godless socialism and encouraged race mixing to the point that every family is polluted with aliens (as well as homo-perverts and mental-genders). Who they will vote to do what is right? God send a pestilence.
Even now as I type this a torrential rain has fallen.
God in like manner pour down Your Blessings upon your people (starting with the knowledge of and conviction of sin and the Spirit of Repentance) and in like manner pour down Your Judgment and Wrath upon all those who hate You!
And from another email from the other day with some new added information:
Try to ignore the supremely LOUD and annoying person presenting this video. He fashions himself as a "political analyst", but he is nothing but a LOUD two-bit HECKLER. You'd think he is commentating live during a WWF or MMA bout being broadcast from a sawmill during operating hours! Did I mention that is he LOUD...? —and in a very odd, out-of-touch, uncircumspect, unnatural manner; like those deviants with no social skills or refinements forcing themselves upon civilization. Maybe such people think they are funny. Those who are not natural humorists should not entertain delusions that they are.
This is truly amazing, the actual video itself... here is a town meeting and the MAYORESS of the town says she is pissed off and angry and so out of control she cannot even formulate her words and maybe even grunts a little while trying to intelligently verbalize her out of control emotions—and she even cries because someone dared not to agree with her parroting her social brainwashing of white guilt—and she declares several times that what the woman who disagreed with her rationally presented is the most-racist thing she has ever heard... and when the accused woman responds the Mayoress tells her she is "out of order". BIMBOS Femi-nazis like this are elected as MAYORS of cities...! No wonder the nation is swirling the drain.
And everyone else on the board at the meeting was a sphinx—except one milquetoasts who meekly attempted to raise his hand to say something... he was probably going to ask if he could go to the bathroom, but probably decided to just hold it (or wet his pants).
I know someone who said that the woman Mayor (about 9 years ago) of a moderate-sized city in Ohio made about $100K a year (or was it $150K?)—and lived in Florida for over half the year...!
Do you think for a moment that cities in Turkey, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the State of Israeli, Kenya, Egypt, Polynesian Islands, Mexico, etc., sit around and talk about how unfair it is for them to have all their nonwhite, nonchristian privilege and how they are not properly representing all their white, Christian constituents if they don't grovel in shame in public at every opportunity, and amputate their own body parts periodically in demonstration of their penitence...?
THAT is why we are swirling the drain. Diversity is not our strength—it is a TERMINAL weakness; it is our DEMISE. We are a laughing stock of other nations; it's almost like a malicious socialist psychology experiment in which they are all competing to see who can top the next in thinking up something outrageous and insulting to which we will simply grovel. WEAK. IMMORAL. PERVERTED. WHIPPED. We let our women be raped and our children be pedophiled and allow our politicians to commit treason on a regular basis and let athletes and entertainers and Big Business insult us and use the wealth they got from our patronage to destroy our nation; and we allow Hollywood to PERVERT everything from movies to sitcoms to commercials that would have caused a Civil War in 1950... and we say nothing when Christians can't wear a cross but Muslims can wear a pup tent and Hindoos have jewels stuck in their heads and Jews force a Kosher tax on our food and Muslims force a Halal tax on our food. What if Christians demanded a Christian tax on food...? Well, that would never happen, because modern Christians have no standards, reject what God commanded, and don't stand for anything.... and Christ's words are fulfilled:
"Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men." (Matthew 5:13)
Salt is not a seasoning when mentioned in the Bible. The phrase, "if the salt hath lost his savour" of Matthew 5:13 should more properly be rendered, "if the salt has become insipid".
Mark 9:50 is rendered even poorer: "Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his saltness, wherewith will ye season it?"
The intention is not "season"—but resurrect! (the Greek word means, "lift up"). If salt has lost its saltness it is no longer salt. Salt must remain separated from its environment and all all pollutants in order to remain salt; otherwise, it is no longer salt but a bastard solution. Salt has a unique chemical and electro-magnetic character. If polluted with contaminated moisture, bacteria, other elements, it loses it chemical charge and is dead, as well as being polluted.
Salt preserves meat because it kills bacteria. I first wrote that in books of mine 23 to 28 years ago. It is still true today.
Subject: Mayor Cries After City Council Member Denies Her 'White Privilege'
And another email that I sent out earlier this year fits in well:
I was searching something else and this came up and caught my eye.
This is dumbfounding, even just this tiny blurb. I didn't even go to the link in which at some student college site, one student was telling other students which teacher to pick for a certain course:
"He allows a double sided sheet of crip notes for exams, on the multiple choice he allows you to choose two options, and drops your lowest test score. READ! READ! .... He is the greatest professor at Cal-Sun makes class interesting gives out candy, lets you use crib notes on the exam..."
It seems that the modern litmus test for how good a teacher is, is if all his students get high grades.
He lets you cheat. He lets you make TWO guesses and drops your lowest score.... and the students love him and flock to him like pigeons to popcorn and statues!
I would be so proud to be able to boast, "I have my Ph.D. in “GUESSING” from California State University — anyone want to hire me...?"
[On the other hand, over a decade ago I met a professor of chemistry at a Christian college in the next town over from me. In the course of conversation he expressed to me unabashedly that he makes it his personal goal to break any student who has a 4.0 grade because no one is perfect. Put this professor and the one mentioned above as the only 2 choices, 99% would pick the class with the guy above (who gives out candy) because 99% of young students don't have a clue about substance, only appearance. They don't have a clue what the concept "learning" actually means—and ironically they are in college! I believe the other professor who wanted to ruin the perfect score of exceptional students is both wrong and crass. He should find ways to motivate his students to excel even more; not merely prove that he is smarter than them (and clearly he had psychological issues of his own, to have such a mentality and personal goal). However, his psychological problems notwithstanding, I would still imagine that his students learn far more in his class than in any class taught by "Professor Candy-Cheater".]
Would you want the guy operating on you, the guy handling your legal defense, your politician, the pilot of the commercial plane that you are in, the guy building your car or house, etc. to have gotten his degree by cheating and guessing?
"I think that's the gall bladder, let me flip a coin and see if it is or if it is the liver or maybe the pancreas; hmmm... two out of three maybe? — nurse, hand me a Snickers Bar and a scalpel, STAT!"
What's next? During an exam he will allow you to make 3 calls to your "life line" to help answer 3 questions or maybe allow you to bring a "consultant" with you to class to help you brainstorm the answers?
Or maybe you can give the "professor" $20 to ask him for the answer the first time, $50 for the second answer, and $100 for the third answer and beyond that you are on your own and he is halfway to his retirement fund after a few semesters. It's a win-win situation.
Or better yet, even as high school students are not taught the multiplication tables, etc., because everyone has calculators, let's make the exams a "group" exam (since "it takes a village to raise a child" — in a STUPID village) and all the students can collaborate and it will teach them how to get along and the whole class passes or fails together depending on how well they work together (or how smart their smartest member is and if they trust him and if he is willing to do ALL the work if they agree to the "price of admission" that he sets for doing all the work)... because in real life situations you will always have other people around so you don't need to know everything.
27 years ago I took a sociology class from a local tech. college because somehow a core class was overlooked by my college and I needed 1 more class to graduate. The teacher at this local college was a very nice man; but he was not a teacher. He was a parole officer and this was his first time teaching a class on anything, and he was teaching because he thought it would be "fun". I thought, well great, he should have some great stories to help back up many different things taught in the sociology class. All he did, every single class, the whole semester, was read the text book to the class. That is all. All of the students were looking around at each other in disbelief. When he got to where a picture was in the book, he would say, "Now, see this picture with this man...?" and then he would read the caption under the picture. Maybe he would have been a so-so teacher in KINDERGARTEN, but this was college. I was dumbfounded. After the semester was over I went to the college office and explained that he was a very nice person, and I had nothing bad to say about him, and then explained his "teaching method". The woman appeared shocked and thanked me. I never bothered to see if he was going to be "teaching" anything the next semester because it was 1.5 hour drive and I fulfilled my requirement and didn't need any more classes.
On the other hand, I was reading the other day in a commentary by Dr. Gordon H. Clark, Ph.D., who expressed that he thought maybe some other faculty members felt slighted when in a meeting of professors Clark off-handedly expressed that any teacher who has to prepare for his classes is incompetent. He said that he could without notice deliver a 5 or 6 hour long lecture on Plato or Aristotle or any number of any other topic--and he could. And he is right. If someone does not know the subject or material he should not be teaching... same goes for preachers.
SPECIAL BONUS FEATURE:
Tom JonesTimes sports columnist
Published: September 7, 2018
Does the NFL have a television ratings problem or not?
IF this is true then anyone calling himself a "Christian" is sinning before God and his fellow men. DISCONNECT. See also my below Rumination if you have not already seen it!
Every time you participate you sin against God and help destroy Christendom. Don't make excuses and pass it off. It is NOT honoring to God or Christ. Whatever is not of faith is sin! If those engaged are immoral and using the money they make from spectators to destroy Christendom, you participate in their evil even if you think you are not. Use your time to honor God and PRODUCE something.
STOP SUPPORTING THE SAVAGES WHO HATE US... STOP watching ALL SPORTS, MOVIES, TV, "Comedians", Musicians, "Singers"