[I am not happy to have to title this article as I have, nor the previous one that will follow (Joel McDurmon Enemy of Christianity and Christendom and Enemy of God... or Judas exposes Peter and Paul). I would love to be able to amend them both if peradventure God would grant him repentance to the acknowledgment of the truth. However, Joel McDurmon’s own declaration asserts: “At such times, leaders must speak with clarity and force.” However, he left out another term, which explains why he is in error: At such times one must also speak uncompromising TRUTH; of which his writing on this topic was devoid. Though I am not a leader (a leader presupposes followers) I am one who full time for 28 years has “stood in the gap” and who has been a lone voice crying in the wilderness, and who has been a trail-blazer and I’ve done my best to “make straight [level]” the path for the remnant to eventually find the path and return to God.]
The entire article below by McDurmon (titled “Line in the Sand...”) is pontifical assertion. Hot air — gas.
Someone emailed me the following. I assume it was an email and not an article at a website. I searched to find it online but I did not find it anywhere. Someone also sent me a link
The link did not work for me, I assume that it is the below article, but I cannot be certain.
THE LINE IN THE SAND ON THE “COLOR LINE”
“Leaders of the Christian Reconstructionist and theonomic world,
“While every issue and time calls for leadership and moral clarity based upon God’s law, occasionally some present outstanding cases and call for enhanced attention. At such times, leaders must speak with clarity and force. The issue of so-called “Kinism” and especially interracial marriage which has been inserted among us brethren is one of those issues, and this is one of those times. Leaders must speak, state their positions with clarity, and not remain silent.
“We all know the immediate case before us, detailed in my recent article (a link to which can be provided if needed). This post is not intended to argue further the details of those two men, but to provide the forum in which Christian Reconstructionists, especially spokespersons, leaders, potential leaders, or aspiring leaders, are called to speak up and state their position on this issue with clarity.
“The issue God has been pleased to present before us in these cases and at this moment is that of the Bible’s position on interracial (more properly inter-ethnic) marriage. The Bible does not forbid marriages between two believers, male and female, of diverse ethnicities. Those who call such marriages sin, adultery, a betrayal of God, or who say that Scripture forbids them in any way generally are in grievous error and sin themselves. Those who call it a form of adultery have thereby slandered thousands if not millions of Christian couples as having committed a crime which we all agree in general is worthy of excommunication. Those who call it a betrayal of God have gone even further and have implicitly invoked the eternal decree. All such opponents of interracial or inter-ethnic marriages are calling evil what God has called good.
“No Christian, and certainly no Christian leader, may remain silent in the face of such false teaching. None should tolerate such teaching in their midst, nor entertain or receive those who teach it. Indeed, each of us to the person ought to unify in decrying this error and endeavoring in the utmost to eradicate it from our assemblies, conferences, associations, etc. The toleration of it as a matter of conscience ignores and shames its countless slandered victims and provides an open door and platform for its promotion and visibility among our ranks. Silence in this case is consent.
“I utterly oppose the anti-miscegenation position, and I call upon everyone else to do so. I hereby draw a line in the sand for leaders and would-be leaders within the Christian Reconstruction movement, broadly speaking. This sinful doctrine is a line that should not be crossed, nor should we allow any teacher with whom we associate to cross it either. This should be a non-negotiable. If at the end of the day, when the dust clears, I am the only one standing on this side of the line, I will remain standing there and not budge, and I will pronounce the same moral judgment then as now; though I am certain I will not be alone.
“I call upon every other leader or would-be leader to make their position equally clear. There is no neutrality on this issue. Either you declare in agreement with tolerating anti-miscegenation views (e.g., the views of John Weaver or Peter Hammond at issue) or you oppose the toleration of them. Now is the time to speak up. Men including myself, Jason Sanchez, Joe Salant, and all other Reconstructionist Radio hosts and contributors, Joel Saint and the board of the Mid-Atlantic Reformation Society, Paul Michael Raymond (New Geneva Leadership Academy), Tim Yarbrough, Andrea Schwartz, Martin Selbrede, and many others (please tag all whom it may concern).
“Let us repeat: Now is the time to speak up to provide moral clarity and leadership. Silence in the face of this evil can only be understood as the toleration and/or tacit support of it.
“Believers are biblically free in body and soul to marry across any color or ethnic line with another believer of the opposite sex. I commit to abstaining from all gatherings and associations—either as a speaker, sponsor, attendee, or any other capacity—where any person teaching otherwise is welcomed or entertained as a teacher or speaker, with the exception of presenting myself as a critical opponent of such views. I call upon all readers to make the same commitment.”
Not a single Bible verse is used in this pontifical petitio principii to give Scriptural support for a single bare assertion / imperial edict that is made.
It is subjective, unscriptural, “self-appointed” ecumenical opinion—calling upon the masses who agree with him to denounce those who do not agree with him; and he is demanding that those who do not agree with him and his named and unnamed pontiffs, “to recant” and agree with him or be defamed and excommunicated (from his papal fantasy).
He pontifically assumes that everyone reading agrees that anyone who disagrees with him on this point should be excommunicated; and he calls on all such persons, all Christian leaders, speakers, Bible conference leaders or attendents to discriminate against such Christian ministers and speakers based upon their religion—based upon their sincerely held Biblical supportive views. It is amazing that he is tolerant and embracing of what God hates, and intolerant of those who obey God in His Decrees. Clearly he is a friend of the world and the enemy of God.
He must think that he is the Pope of Protestantism. He claims, I believe, Presbyterianism, Reconstruction, and Theonomy. I don’t think that John Knox or R. J. Rushdoony (whose granddaughter he married, I believe) would recognize him. He has, without realizing it, excommunicated himself from the True Church of Christ. “If any man preach any other Gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” (Galatians 1:9) It is he that is preaching the “another doctrine” of the modern, liberal age, not the doctrine of the Old and New Testaments, nor the Reformation. God commands the separation of His people from aliens, consistently, from Genesis to Revelation. Not being unequally yoked is commanded from Moses to Paul and John. To not understand the Old Testament and God’s Plan is to misinterpret the Gospel and the Great Commission.* On top of his pontification, he blasphemes God’s obedient children accusing them of sin.
[* See my, Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on Romans, 758pp., pb., 40.00 + P&H; Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on Hebrews, 632pp., pb., 30.00 + P&H; Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on John 3; and my Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on Jonah, 634pp., 32.00 + P&H. See also my Apologetic Exposition series (Acts 13, Acts 15, Isaiah 56, II Corinthians 3; Galatians 3, 88pp., 6.00 + P&H each; and John 4, 46pp., 4.50 + P&H).]
Morality does not change. Unions that God forbade in the Old Testament do not change in the New. Those who think that they do are in the mere infancy of their Biblical understanding. A “Christian leader” with a telephone pole in each eye, thinking that he sees specks in the eyes of others, is ludicrous. It can be likened unto an episode of the “Three Stooges”, in which a person is carrying an 8-foot long 2x4 on his shoulder, and abruptly, without warning or circumspection, quickly turns around 180o and innocent bystanders get wacked in the head. In a movie that is supposed to be a comedy, it is semi-funny (but only to those who have never actually been hit in the head with a 2x4; it’s not really that funny, except to children with undeveloped minds or borderline psychopathology, or adults who are little different). In a presumed “Christian leader” it is not funny at all. With telephone poles sticking out of both of his eyes, no one in his vicinity is safe, and it is no surprise that he cannot understand the Scriptural text. Such people are like aspiring political shooting stars; but they shall reap what they have sewn and propelled soley by their own gas they will quickly “burn out” and “plummet” to earth; even as Heyleyl [improperly called “Lucifer”] was cast out of Heaven. It is you and your cohorts who are at a crossroads:
“Humble yourselves in the Sight of the Lord and He shall lift you up” (James 4:10); otherwise—
“Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18); therefore—
“let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall” (I Corinthians 10:12); knowing that—
“God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble” (James 4:6).
Malachi 2 informs us:
“1And now, O ye priests, this Commandment is for you.
2If ye will not hear, and if ye will not lay it to heart, to give glory unto my Name, saith the LORD of hosts, I will even send a curse upon you, and I will curse your blessings: yea, I have cursed them already, because ye do not lay it to heart.
[Glory is given to God’s Name by obeying Him.]
3Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces, even the dung of your solemn feasts; and one shall take you away with it.
4And ye shall know that I have sent this Commandment unto you, that My Covenant might be with Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.
5My Covenant was with him of life and peace; and I gave them to him for the fear wherewith he feared Me, and was afraid before My Name.
[Those who do not obey God’s Commandments do not fear Him; neither do they love Him. So says the Word of God. It is not my own pontification.]
6The Law of Truth was in his mouth, and iniquity was not found in his lips: he walked with Me in peace and equity, and did turn many away from iniquity.
7For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they [God’s people] should seek the Law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.
[If the priests turn from the Law of God, they are no longer God's priests, but like Balaam, prophets for hire (and for eventual fire).]
8But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the Law; ye have corrupted the Covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.
9Therefore have I also made you contemptible and base before all the people, according as ye have not kept My Ways, but have been partial* in the Law.
[* That which is translated partial is a compound Hebrew word meaning, “lift the face”. I believe the intention is something like “turned up ones nose from” (as if avoiding a horrendous odour or something that he deems offensive or “beneath him”). This seems to coincide with—“He that turneth away his ear from hearing the Law, even his prayer shall be abomination” (Proverbs 28:9)—which is that to which v.8 is referring and what McDurmon and his ilk are doing—and
“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to Me: seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” (Hosea 4:6)
May God bring this to pass quickly, in McDurmon’s life and those of his confederates, that the Word of God be not blasphemed. They think it a light thing to disobey the God of the universe, to teach His children that they too need not obey Him (which is what the Serpent tempted the Federal Parents of God’s people in the garden); it is what Christ denounced and said such “leaders” will be the “least in the Kingdom of Heaven”—IF they even know God and are converted; which is very hard to believe since they reject God’s Commandments (declaring that they are no longer Commandments*) and are friends of the world, preaching the world’s moral philosophy, and attacking God’s! They think that it is a light thing to participate in and even encourage the murder of God’s children and rape and defile the bride of Christ.
* —and thus, they are 1-step away from being as vile as “former Christian” singer-songwriter Ray Boltz (and others like him) who have “come out of the closet” as being homoperverts, and yet continue to write “Christian” songs and perform at “Christian” churches, now singing songs, so it seems, justifying homoperversion, “guilt-tripping” those who oppose what God called “abomination”, and “comforting” those homoperverts whose “feelings” have been hurt if they have been rejected by moral, Christian society (what tiny vestige in Christendom that remains).
Consider these warnings...!
“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” (Galatians 6:7)
But rather, heed:
“19I call Heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you Life and Death, Blessing and Cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live: 20That thou mayest love the LORD thy God, and that thou mayest obey His Voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto Him: for He is thy Life, and the length of thy days.” (Deuteronomy 30)
“23Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD: and not that he should return from his ways, and live? 24But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked man doeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die. 25Yet ye say, The way of the Lord is not equal. Hear now, O house of Israel; Is not my way equal? are not your ways unequal? 26When a righteous man turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and dieth in them; for his iniquity that he hath done shall he die. 27Again, when the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness that he hath committed, and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive. 28Because he considereth, and turneth away from all his transgressions that he hath committed, he shall surely live, he shall not die.” (Ezekiel 38)
1. The wicked man / righteous man referred to here solely refer to God’s true people.
2. This is not suggesting any works-oriented salvation; and thus, the passage is to be understood in one of two ways:
i). it is referring to the physical life, in that, if one commits a sin worthy of death and does not repent of it, then all his previous “good works” will have been meaningless, because God’s Justice is not meted out by measuring scales, weighing the good against the evil, but by trueness of heart; true conversion, true repentance;
ii). sin begins in the heart / nature. Obeying God / bearing fruit / keeping God’s Law / doing good works (all synonyms) does not make one to be “saved”. An apple tree does not bear apples in order to become an apple tree, but because it is one. “Walk in the Spirit and ye shall not fulfill the lusts of the flesh [the violation of all that God commanded]”. Obeying God’s Law does not “make one” God’s child and does not cause one to be regenerated—obeying God’s Law is the by-product of salvation, the work of the Holy Spirit in the truly regenerated child of God, and establishes that child as an honorable son. If someone went through the motions of obeying God for the first half of his life (or any period of time, great or small), but then defected into the vilest of sins, without repentance, that is a possible indicator that the person was never truly converted. Hebrews 10:26ff. speaks of this, “coming to the knowledge of the truth” is not the same as conversion; it refers to mere window shopping and moving on. Only God knows who are truly converted, who fell into vile, unrepentant sin, and may be delivered unto Satan that though their body will be destroyed, their spirit, which was truly converted, will be saved on the Day of Judgment; or whether a person was never truly converted, but was deluded (by delusion sent by God) or a tare sown in among the wheat.]
[...returning to Malachi 2:]
10Have we [Israel] not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the Covenant of our fathers?
[It is dishonest, unbiblical, and abominable to attempt to use this verse to support the heresy of the “Universal Brotherhood of Man”. Don’t forget to whom the book (and the entire Bible) was written. No amount of desire can change reality. Re-read Romans 9. God chooses. It is not of man that desires or strives, but God who determines and He declared whom He chose. Likewise, the “whosoever will” passages refer to whosoever will of the elect of God’s people. Don’t stop reading at Acts 2:21; read v.22. False Bible teachers created false doctrine by not rightly dividing the Word of Truth—and for it they have a special curse upon them.]
11Judah hath dealt treacherously, and an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem; for Judah hath profaned the holiness of the LORD which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god.
12The LORD will cut off the man that doeth this, the master and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering unto the LORD of hosts.” (Malachi 2)
McDurmon does not call upon the authority of Scripture, but instead engages in blatant argumentum ad hominem as well as shameless ad baculum and ad populum. When God and the Truth are not on your side, yes indeed, you must appeal to character assassination, force, and the masses (and the majority is usually wrong—especially if they follow false leaders).
He is as dishonest as he is ignorant and arrogant.
He issues papal decrees laced with deceit when he pompously declares that any Christians who oppose what Joel McDurmon thinks that God declared to be good (and “racial intermarrage” is the “goodness” to which McDurmon unbiblically refers), “are in grievous error and sin themselves” and need to be excommunicated and shunned—but he nowhere offers a single Bible verse as evidence that God called interracial marriage “good” or that God commanded all the races to intermarry. However, a plethora of verses to the contrary can easily be found. Furthermore, Joel’s position is only tenable if you believe in a “changing” God and a “changing” morality—both of which fly in the face of all Scripture and logic.
[Actually, God forbade intermarriage in His Primary Law of “Kind After Kind”. One reason that God sent confusion at Babel was because He had commanded the peoples to disperse (in a sense, segregate—these were not alien peoples of different races, but God wanted even the sons of Shem, Ham, and Japheth separate) and they had not. The historical event at Babel did not include every race, but primarily Hamites (who were not black), Japethites (who were not oriental or European), and Semites (not the Jews). Some of these men were wicked, having departed from the Way of God. They were a bad influence on the rest. Furthermore, there were some that God did not want together, even though they were related. However, Nimrod established himself as a tyrant and attempted to dominate all as a warlord (he was “a hunter [of men] in God’s Face”). Nimrod attempted to establish a mighty tower in the top of which was the heavens (that is, at the top it contained a shrine dedicated to the worship of heavenly bodies; and eventually the worship of Nimrod himself). After they dispersed God broke up the singular continent of the earth and set continental drift into motion (faster initially, but then slowing down). This was in the days of Peleg, in which the earth was divided. See, Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on Genesis / Judges, 711pp., pb., 40.00 + P&H. See also my annotated editions of Races in Chaos, 6x9 pb., 214pp, 16.50 + P&H and Kind Unto Kind, 6x9 pb., 524 pages. 27.50 + P&H; The Creation of Man in Genesis 1 and 2, 88pp., 6.00 + P&H; and Ten Commandments For Youth —For Everyone! For Youth and Young-minded (teachable) Adults - An Explanation of the Ten Commandments and A Memory System using Bible Numerics; c.440pp., 6.25 x 9.25, pb., 25.00 + P&H; not on a child’s level, but for older youth and spirit-led adults.]
This erroneous declaration, that those who oppose what God called good—wildly claiming that God called racial intermarriage “good”—are therefore in sin, itself is a cluster of confusion (of which God is not the author).
First of all, it shows ignorance of the meaning of the Hebrew word tob (long o as in strobe) and in what context God declared all to be “good”. First of all, what “good” means in this context primarily is not a moral declaration (and not what Joel McDurmon decrees good to be), or even a declaration of perfection (though both those things can be inferred, for the most part*). What this means is that whatever God created was “exactly how God wanted it to be for His Purpose”. Scripture tells us that He does all “for His Own Good Pleasure”; this is what “and God saw that it was good” means. Furthermore, before each declaration of “good” we are told “after its own kind” (10 times in the first chapter of Genesis; 10 being the number of “Divine Perfect Order”).
[* Isaiah records for us God’s very declaration, “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.” (45:7) Is light “darkness”...? Is evil “good”...? Is black “white”...?* No: That would violate the law of contradiction and render all thought to be invalid nonsense. That which is evil cannot be morally good at the same time. God also pronounced a curse on those who call evil good and good evil (take notes Joel!). God created the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Was a Tree that was half evil morally “Good”...? Of course not! It was “good” only in the sense that it was the way that God wanted it to be (pleasing in His Sight, for His Own Good Purpose). For more detail, see my, Does God Repent? — Can God Change His Mind?, 506pp., 25.00 + P&H and God and Evil, 280pp., pb., 18.00 + P&H.
* Those who think that skin color is the only racial difference are infants in their understanding. Those who have a problem with reality hate God. Those who reject God’s Decrees hate God. Those who side with the world instead of Scripture (or who pervertedly “interpret” Scripture according to the sinful notions of the God-hating world, again, hate God. Those who think that God is bound to change and conform Himself to what sinful man imagines to be “fair”, likewise, hate God. God likewise hates them: “The LORD trieth the righteous: but the wicked and him that loveth violence His soul hateth.” (Psalm 11:5) Race mixing and homoperversion are violence. They violate God’s Law. They destroy His creation. They destroy civilization. They destroy God’s Family (which does not include everyone). An honest study will show that such perverted mixing leads to the end of a civilization / empire. Such was the end of all great empires. Joel McDurmon is also wrong in his suggestion that it is mere ethinicity and not race. This is a falsehood. Ethnicity can refer to different nations or cultures of the same race. All races are not related and are not of the same family. All races do not come from Adam. The notion that all races come from Adam violates God’s Primary Law of “Kind After Kind” and is a form of evolultion. It is a genetic impossibility as well as a violation of God’s Word.]
Secondly, just because God declared everything to be “good” does not mean that it was good for chimpanzees to copulate with any other animal if they so desired. This is a non sequitur fallacy of “missing middle”. Joel must wear quasi-theological 10-League Boots to make such grand leaps across doctrinal continents.
However, Scripture is replete with passages that tell us that God created each after its own kind. Seeming similarity is not evidence of sameness. Emotional dynamics (or psychotic notions) do not decide reality. God decreed all. He determined the elect in Christ before the foundation of the world—from one people and from the chosen line of that people. God created various forms of life as separate and distinct creation. None “evolved” from the other. The fact that other “races” all “bleed red blood”, and therefore, that means that they are the same, is an infantile notion; so do dogs and gorillas. One must be utterly ignorant of true biology, anthropology, and psychology* and believe in EVOLUTION in order to believe that all races came from Adam or Noah’s sons. The Hebrew word Adam (the proper noun form of one of the main words for “man”) literally means, “blushing man” (see Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance, words #119/120/121), “to flush or blush, show blood in the face, to be rosy, ruddy”. David was ruddy (rosy cheeked, red-haired); Sarah is described as “fair” (light complexioned)—and David and Sarah were not “atypical” of their people. Rachel’s brother Laban’s name means, “white”. Esau himself was ruddy—covered in red hair. God commanded separation from alien peoples (especially those whom He cursed forever: Joel McDurmon is not God, and therefore, cannot “undecree” God’s Decrees). God commanded alien wives (who should never have been married—which God calls whoredom) to be divorced and all children by them sent away with the mothers forever.
[* —and that is another reason for the feverish push to have all races amalgamate—because then the clear and stark differences in biology, anthropology, and psychology disappear as all are lost in one mongrelized mass: Babylon, “confusion by mixing”—and the Great Whore is the one who has lain down with all the kings of the earth. Whores and whoremongers are those who first cross the racial and gender boundaries that God established. Joel is a self-declared high priest for the Harlot Church. The Harlot Church is Antichrist. May God grant him the Holy Spirit of Conviction and Repentance and Understanding before he leads others astray to share in his fate unless he turns from the path of destruction that he is on.]
Evolutionist fools say that man’s DNA is 99% the same as our “nearest relative” the chimpanzee! [or more precisely, “humans share 98.8 percent of their DNA with bonobos and chimpanzees. Humans and gorillas share 98.4 percent of their DNA.”] BIG DEAL...! That statistic becomes meaningless when you realize other facts, such as: According to scientists, 98% of man’s DNA is the same as that of pigs; 80% with mice; 60% with fruit flies; 50% with bananas, and 25% with “our distant cousin” the rice plant! [Boy oh boy... what are vegetarians and vegans going to eat when they learn that...?] Why did Joel not marry a baboon or a pig? 98% or 99%—what’s the difference? According to Joel and others like him, there would be no sin in marrying a gorilla because nowhere does God say that you can’t (if, as Joel thinks, God’s Law has been abolished—yet the same Law that forbids homoperversion and bestiality forbids race mixing; those who don’t like it are free to find or invent a more “user-friendly” man-centered “religion”). Since God created the gorilla “good”, then it must be a good mate for humans... right?
God created laws and moral boundaries. If those moral boundaries could not be crossed they would be barricades—and barricades are no test of obedience. Disobedience has consequences—unpleasant, long term, even permanent consequences. All who descend from Adam share in Adam’s sin. Does Joel think that is “fair”...? Does Joel deny that doctrine of total depravity as a result of Federal Headship also? does he deny that ALL creation, likewise, fell when Adam fell...? Joel ignores the boundaries that God established, in order to be a friend of the Harlot Church and with the world (Babylon)—and thus, he is a self-declared enemy of God telling God’s children that they are the ones in sin! This is a classic example of the cast-iron kettle calling the polar bear black. If he is not lusting after being a friend of the world then why does he espouse the world’s rhetoric and philosophy and dogma? Homoperversion is following the very same trail blazed for it by interracial marriage (from being considered a crime / taboo, to being ignored, tolerated, accepted, embraced, glorified, and then itself becoming militant and intolerant). The very same verses that are used to justify race mixing (because they are taken out of context), if (incorrectly) interpreted CONSISTENTLY, justify homoperversion too. You can’t pick and choose Joel. Joel, do you think homoperverion is “good” too? that God declared it to be “good” and that there is no sin in it and it is perfectly normal and wholesome, and that those who opposed it are the ones who are in sin? Really Joel, can’t you see that everything that God commanded and loves the world hates and demonizes; and everything that God hates and forbade the world loves and celebrates? This is a “no brainer” even if you don’t know the Word of God. It’s time to change church membership Joel. Repent and come out of the world / Babylon, or stop calling yourself a Christian. You are one of the people who will say to Christ on the Day of Judgment, “But didn’t I do all these ‘wonderful things’ in Your Name?” and Christ will reply, “I never knew you; depart from me ye that work iniquity [a-nom-ia, “lawlessness”]”. That seems pretty silly if the Law was to be abolished. The whole New Testament seems pretty silly, especially the very last books of the Bible to be written, the epistles of John, which speak greatly about sin and repentance and confession of sin. Paul recorded:
“17Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch [join] not the unclean thing people; and I will receive you, 18And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be My sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.” (II Corinthians 6)
[* “people” is the topic of the preceding verses in the chapter, not some nebulous “thing”; and “people” is the topic of the passage in Isaiah 52:11 which II Corinthians expresses in different words: “Depart ye, depart ye, go ye out from thence, touch no unclean thing; go ye out of the midst of her”. Robert Young in his Literal Translation (which is “hit or miss”) translates this portion of the verse appropriately, “The unclean touch not”; though touch not should be “join not”. The Hebrew naw-gah means, “lay the hand upon (for any purpose; euphemistically, to lie with a woman)... join”. To translate this passage you must look at PURPOSE. The whole chapter of both passages refers to separating from alien people. Sons and daughters, likewise, are people; not “things”. God being our Father is a person, not a “thing”. God said, “I will make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee but will not make a full end of thee”. God said that He would give the lives of other people as a ransom for the lives of His people. God said that entire nations of other people are like a drop of water in a bucket or the fine dust of the balances (to be ritualistically blown off without any thought of loss)—so then, what are any mere individuals...? God commanded the Canaanites to be destroyed, man, woman, child and suckling infant. God said that He separated all other peoples from His people even as He separated unclean from clean animals—and commanded us to put a difference because He put a difference! To not do so is Antichrist. God separated clean from unclean in the very act of creation—none “evolved” from or descended from the other; they were created separate, distinct, UNRELATED, though they may share some similar features, that is because they have the same Creator—but they are not the same and do not have the same purpose or destiny, even as they don’t have the same origin; and God created them similar to test obedience (which test, you seem to have failed utterly in theory, but hypocritically, you passed it in practice by not practicing what you preach; since you married someone of the same race).]
The majority of people (brainwashed in the godless, socialist schools and media) in modern society are also fooled by looking at the many shades of hybrids and thus assuming that the original stock whence they sprang is similar to us—when they are not; they are 10 times worse than the hybrids—but just because hybrids are better than outright savages does not justify hybridism which God forbade. The majority are hybrids. Why do you think God commanded, “Come out of her (Babylon, “confusion by mixing”) My people”...? The mongrelized majority, like a massive mud-slide are gaining mass and momentum. God will not be forced to change and accept those who attempt to force themselves on Him; God will not accept the children thrust into His nursery, replacing His very children; and Christ will not have a bride forced on Him, whom He did not choose—especially since it violates His Own Law and would defile Him (Matthew 11:12; John 10:1). Would you accept a bride forced upon you that violated all that was holy? assuming that you care about what is holy and actually know what is holy; rather than what is pleasing to the world. Those who have no concept of Holiness have no concept of God’s Decrees and espouse a hedonistic humanism that forces God to please man. That’s why it is called a “remnant”... God does not accept everyone, but whom He chose. The feet of iron mingled with clay in Nebuchadnezzar’s image represents integration and it is unstable, Christ despises it, and will strike the feet and 6,000 years of history and civilization will end. Homoperversion and race-mixing go hand in hand and both are the terminal stages of any civilization. Do you not know that communism is “one race”...? That’s how they destroy nations: from within. Mixed peoples cannot stand together. Our colonies were able to fight off mighy Britain because we were one people of one faith. Divide and conquer works quite well and you are its proud evangelist! God commands separation. You are on the wrong side Joel! Noah found Grace in the Eyes of the Lord because He was righteous—and pure in his generations (genealogies). Even after the return of the remnant to Jerusalem, the genealogical records were consulted and all those not found therein were thrust out. Maybe you would have set fire to the Temple to destroy those genealogical records, had the Edomite-imposter priests not done so under cover of Titus’ invasion. The Prince Zerubbabel (a type of Christ) [which name means “coming out of Babylon / confusion”], the High Priest Jeshua (clearly a type of Christ) and the elders, upon their return, were confronted by the alien peoples in the land. The alien peoples said that they wanted to help build the Temple to Yahweh. Zerubbabel and the others RIGHTEOUSLY replied, “YE HAVE NOTHING to do with us to build a Temple to our God!” You’re on the wrong side Joel.
Disease will contaminate all if the sickly are not quarantined; if the healthy do not separate themselves and refuse to allow the sickly to force themselves on them. It does not sound “nice” or “fair”, but those liberal concepts do not overrule reality or God’s Commands.
Babylon seems to be winning (at least, to those who don’t realize that is part of God’s Plan to demonstrate His Power when He delivers His elect remnant—after culling out many of His wicked people who claim to be “Christians” who have polluted themselves with the world or who encourage others to do so—that is why Judgment has been sent—and God said that He would send the very worst of the heathen to dispossess us, and that is the Flood [Third World “immigration” invasion] that the Dragon [Satan] has vomited forth out of his mouth to drown us)... and now they have Joel as their champion: He seems to believe that nothing would please God more than for His people to marry the flood, the very worst of the heathen—for Master’s children to breed with the dogs on top of the table!
Even during the days of slavery, in the South, some immoral whites began mixing their seed with their female black slaves because half-breeds brought better prices on the auction block! Amazing... the blacks were not even good slaves compared to half-breeds. Furthermore, again, in lusting after being a friend of the world, Joel condemns slavery without a trial! Paul did not tell Philemon to free his runaway slave Onesimus, but to treat him kindly and receive him back without abuse. God established laws of slavery in the Old Testament. Is God immoral Joel? We too are called slaves (that’s what a “bond-servant is”—that’s what someone is who has been bought with a price, who is not his own)—slaves of Christ Jesus. Is Jesus immoral Joel...? Does He need to repent and come grovelling to you also...? Scripture says “be ye not unequally yoked with infidels”. This does not mean that alien races can be married if they “convert”. Were that the case, God would not have told the Israelites to exterminate the Canaanites, but convert them—and God would not have told the Israelites to divorce alien wives and send them away, but evangelize them! Your mind is contaminated by the world Joel, and you think God is supposed to conform to modern sinful delusions concerning morality, rather than sinful man repenting and obeying what God commanded throughout all our generations forever!
Christ said to the Syro-Phenician woman (who was a Greek, an Israelite either of the dispersion or from a contingent that left Israel around the time of the conquest; members of the tribe of Judah or Danites who took to the sea), “It is not meet to take the children’s bread and give it to the dogs”. Christ was not referring to this woman, but to her child. The Greek word is koonarion, “puppy”. Her child was mixed. The woman had faith (a gift of the Holy Spirit to the elect of God’s people with which they believe unto salvation) and she knew the Hebrew Scriptures. She did not say that the puppies were the same as the Master’s children (like you do, Joel), but she realized taht they could have the overflow of blessing—if they maintained their proper place.
God commanded in Deuteronomy 23:2 that no bastard (mongrel) and additionally, specifically no Ammonite or Moabite could enter the congregation (not merely the “church service”—but Israelite society in any way) not even unto the 10th generation, no not ever. Was God immoral for saying that Joel? Was God immoral for commanding Israelites who sinned and married alien women to divorce them and send all women by them away forever. Do you think that God “changed”, Joel? Does Yahweh mean, “I Am That I Am” or “I Ain’t What I Was”...? Do you think that God “repented of sin” and “turned over a new leaf” and “had a better idea” and “changed" His declared perpetual Standard of Morality that He commanded us to follow throughout all our generations forever? — the Law of which Christ said not one jot or tittle would pass and that He did not come to destroy the Law...? Read Deuteronomy 7:9, I Chronicles 16:15, and Psalm 105:8 (that is, unless you think that the Old Testament “expired” and “went bad” and was “abolished” and is relegated to the scrap bin of theology). God commanded His Law—His entire Law—to a thousand generations. Do you have any idea how long that is Joel (even though it is a figure of speech meaning forever)...? It has only been about 178 generations since Adam until today.
How can we obey the command, “Be holy as I am Holy” if the “Standard” for us has “changed” but the Standard for God has not changed because He is Immutable and He cannot change...? What does “Reformed Theology” mean in your mind Joel...? Are you an existential humanist? Maybe that needs to be established; like deposing Bill Clinton. Common words that we take for granted and assume that everyone agrees on their meaning, when duplicitous people are involved, words need to be defined and their meaning nailed down.
The “Edomite” and “Egyptian” in the next verse in Deuteronomy 23:3 is referring SOLELY to the original Egyptians: who were pure Hamites / white, and not Nubians / black. The Egyptians became a mingled people over millennia of intermarrying with Nubians (who did not descend from Ham) from Sub-sahara that were later imported for slaves after the Israelites left the nation of Egypt in shambles after God’s Judgments had fallen on Egypt—and God declared that the Egyptian nation would never again amount to anything. HOW did God accomplish that? —by having the Egyptians intermarry with Nubians and Turks... as you would have Christendom do, which would result in the same destruction; even as it has been doing for the past 75 years, but you seem blind and unable to see its results. Maybe you think global warming and not being vegetarians is what has caused all the crime and evil and corruption.
Christ said give not that which is holy unto the dogs and cast not pearls before swine lest they turn and trample and destroy you. The “reason” given is NOT the main reason (which anyone with any spiritual understanding knows), but a secondary, resultant reason. The primary reason is because it is an ABOMINATION and because God forbade it. Likewise, the intermarriage with the Canaanites God FOREVER forbade; a secondary, resultant reason was because God’s people would learn their filthy perverse abominations (which you are now encouraging); the primary reason was because it was an ABOMINATION and God forbade it: It destroys God’s people whom He created separate and distinct and in His Very Image. It destroys His Image! Thus murder is a sin and so is race mixing—for the same reason. God commanded all alien wives to be divorced and all children by them sent away. Go ahead Joel. Tell me that God was evil and needs to repent and that no one should go to a Bible conference where God is a speaker. Tell me Jesus was evil and needs to repent and no one should attend any Bible conference in which He is present unless He is repenting in shame.
Do you forget that God forbade cross-breeding livestock and crops Joel...? Do you think God’s very children are worth less than cows and cowpeas? or jackasses and jackfruit? It’s okay if God’s children are mongrels but God forbid that there should be a mule or a pluot...? Wheat is not to be cross-bred with tares, nor sheep with dogs or pigs—the tare will be separated in the end and burned with fire, not welcomed into the family. What do you think will happen to any hybrids. Christ said that He would uproot every plant that His Heavenely Father had not planted. Those are imposters and the hybrids they sire—brought into existence by Satan deceiving false shepherds into teaching blind sheep that God loves race mixing!
American pastor and Evangelist John R. Rice, though he was in error on some significant points understood the Biblical position far-better than you Joel.
[22 pages; written in 1956 and 5,000 copies were printed; 5,000 copies were reprinted in 1959. This booklet was reprinted several other times, once adding to the title the words, “Shall We Mix Races in Schools?” According to one printing, 46,000 copies of the booklet were in print.]
[I reprint dozens older books and booklets by American pastors and evagelists. Not all were as good thinkers as others; but at least they did not remain silent in the face of the destruction of Christendom—or promote it as you do Joel. Inquire for a list of these titles.]
Many other Bible scholars held the same position. Most all of them did before the modern era of being raised in the government mind-perverting schools and compromising apostate churches, colleges, and seminaries. Are you a product of the public schools Joel? Most Christian schools are likewise perverted. My Christian High School (class of 1980) and my Christian College—both once in the highest national ranking... are now both subverted, and so are most all other Christian institutions because they have adopted the polluted world’s philosophy and dogma and thereby have rejected the Word of God (though they still consider themselves dedicated “Christians” they are on a downward spiral to oblivion). Truth does not change. Immoral, dishonest people change what is considered truth; and bury the truth itself as deeply as possible so few can ever find it.
For thousands of years—and during the Golden Ages of all the nations of Christendom, race mixing was considered an abomination, a sin, a crime. Now, as Christendom is “Christian” only in the memory of those who know true history, in nations now in astronomical, unpayable debt that has our great-grandchildren already sold, where political corruption is the norm and not even blinked at, where all perversions walk proudly in the street and terrorize decent people; where aliens invade at will and murder and rape are considered, “normal”, over 2.2 million prisoners and the victims rarely, if ever, being compensated (and everyone taxed to support the multi-billion dollar police, court, and prison growth industries—in which no one is reformed and it is a violation of God’s Law) and the younger generations think that things have always been like this—in this evil modern age homoperversion and race mixing are thought to be “wonderful lifestyle choices” and anyone who disagrees is the worst type of criminal. What’s wrong with this picture Joel? You’re on the wrong side Joel. You’ve sided with Antichrist.
You may say that older generations were “antiquated” and that they were “the product of the Zeitgeist in which they were raised”. BOLOGNA / BALONEY (however you wish to spell it), Joel! Was Jesus likewise? Was Jesus just a “confused racist who needed to repent of the immoral Zeitgeist by which His Mind was polluted...?” He is the same yesterday, today, and forever Joel. Have you read that verse? Do you understand it? He is the Alpha and Omega—and Immutable. The alphabet is not “still evolving” Joel.
Take a look at society Joel. Do you study much? (that is, any non-liberal, non-modernist, valid works). Do you even know what the world was like before so-called “Civil Rights”...? before the un-Civil War...? Have you ever studied crime statistics? Buy an almanac from 1920, 1940, and 2018 and do a little study Joel. Move out of your ivory palace into the ghetto. That will be even more enlightening. Move to Nairobi or Cairo or Baghdad. That will be an education you will never forget (for as long as you are still alive). Take your wife and kids. They’ll have a wonderful time and you can marry them off, maybe sell each daughter for 100 goats; age doesn’t matter and when they are not making babies they can be just one more slave in the harem. Won’t that make Jesus smile...? I can’t seem to remember the verse of Scripture that says that the sheep are supposed to lay their lives down for the wolves, dogs, and swine. I can’t seem to remember where the Good Shepherd laid His Life down for the wolves, dogs, and swine either. Maybe you can tell me where those verses can be found.
Civilization did not evolve Joel. It was developed by God’s people alone because His Spirit is upon us and it has been destroyed to the degree that we have sinned against God and violated His Command to be separate. You are part of the Ichabod Church, Joel. The “Glory has departed” because those who profess to be His have gone a whoring after alien people, after their customs and ways, in violation of all that God commanded; so God’s Spirit is no longer with us and that is why Christendom is being destroyed. God declared,
“6My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to Me: seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children. 6As they were increased [grew in abundance because of God’s Blessings], so they sinned against Me: therefore will I change their glory into shame. 8They eat up the sin of My people, and they set their heart on their iniquity. 9And there shall be, like people, like priest: and I will punish them for their ways, and reward them their doings.” (Hosea 4).
Our children are the “next generation of us”, Joel. If there are no children there is no more us! Christ said that unless God drew those days of final judgment short, no flesh of the elect would surive. We are being bred out of existence—and you are helping the enemy! Rather than call God’s people to repentance, Joel, you are calling them to follow you deeper into the belly of the beast... deeper into Babylon... deeper into the Harlot Church. Rather than being a Watchman on the wall, you are enticing God’s people to marry their children to the invading barbarians.
When Christ returns He is not going to fluff the aura of the wicked Joel. Do you still believe in Hell? I guess believing in Hell is a moot point if you simply discard what God calls sin and therefore think that because you so decree it that God will not be able to use Hell (or in your mind, it will be full of Christian white racists and everyone else will be in Heaven). Why don’t you preach against Black racists? Hispanic racists? Muslim racists? —who rape and murder THOUSANDS of white people every day throughout all of Christendom. Why do you denounce and attack God-fearing ministers who have never raped or lynched or murdered anyone and have no desire to...? Why don’t you speak of the brutal torture rapes and mutilation murders of peaceful white South African farmers Joel? —who NEVER owned a single slave in the history of their nation and never harmed any blacks (unless you are against criminal justice too, and consider prosecuting violent criminals to be “evil”).
King David was a man after the Lord’s Own Heart. David wrote:
“21Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate Thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against Thee? 22I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies. 23Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts: 24And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting." (Psalm 139)
God commanded, “Ye that love the LORD, hate evil” (Psalm 97:10) and Scripture tells us, “The fear of the LORD is to hate evil” (Proverbs 8:13). Evil never becomes good. Immorality never becomes moral. Abominations never become “wonderful”. Darkness never becomes light. You call evil good and good evil; and you love what God hates and hate what God loves. Why is that Joel? Those who reject God’s Decrees reject God. Those who hate God’s Law (His Unchanging Standard of Morality) hate God.
Your notion of the South is polluted. Your notion of slavery in the U.S. is polluted. Were there some lynchings that were uncalled for? Certainly. There are sinful people who abuse others and act shamefully in every age and every society. But it was a truly Christian society back then. Was it perfect? Of course not—since the Fall of Adam society cannot be perfect. But it was 1,000 times better than the immoral cesspool in which we live today. Do you realize that before so-called “Civil Rights” most houses did not even have locks on their doors? people left their car keys in the car ignition (where they would not lose them)? people (including women or children) could walk anywhere, alone, day or night and not be robbed, raped, beat up, or murdered? people kept nearly their entire paycheck? the majority of the population went to church and did not seek their own pleasure? the nation was not in bankruptcy? people stood up and opposed evil? prayer and reading the Bible was still in the public schools? white families had many children? Now, whites have about one child per family. God has forgotten our children, just as He said; because we have abandoned His Law. Yet the nonwhites have half a dozen children legitimately—and another dozen illegitimately! God said He would send the very worst of the heathen to REPLACE US, if we turned from His Ways.
The majority who were lynched deserved it; unless you think that blacks raping white women is perfectly acceptable, or deserves merely a slap on the wrist. Do you? What about the hundreds and thousands of stories across Christendom daily, like the 3 black women in Pennsylvania who with hammers beat in the head of an unsuspecting white man who was sitting at a gas station; because one of their young sons thought it would be fun to lie and say the man called him a racial name. Even had the man done so (which he did not, the gas station security camera shows they never talked to each other and the boy finally confessed that he made it up) he did not deserve having his head beat in with hammers and being murdered if he had called someone a name (especially since blacks call each other that very name 100 times a day!). While names may be offensive, it is not an injury. Free speech is a right. Those who can’t handle it should live in another country. Maybe black Africa. Words are not a crime. I do not promote insults or baiting; but that is not the issue, so don’t go off point.
Another young white couple was kidnapped in Tennessee and abused and tortured over 3 days and murdered. Things like this go on every single day throughout Christendom—nonwhite on white crime. The majority of crimes referred to as being committed by whites are not; they are mixed breeds, often part black or hispanic, who consider themselves white because they don’t want to be considered black or hispanic; but that does not make them white—but the crimes are falsely blamed on whites. Regardless, you choose to attack peaceful preachers of the Gospel who hold to traditional morality, and ignore the tens of thousands of rapes and murders against white people by nonwhites. Why is that Joel? You are not a shepherd, but a swine-herder, or a shepherd who has a secret deal with the wolves.
People used to leave their doors unlocked Joel. They left their car keys in the car. New Yorkers for many decades now have had multiple locks on their doors (some have a half dozen or more on one apartment door), as well as security cameras, security guards, and an army of police—and they still live in fear. Yet crime is worse. Why? —because of what Pastor Weaver and McCurry believe about mixed-marriages being unbiblical? Is that what causes all those nonwhites to commit hundreds of thousands of crimes a year? Why do people have so many locks on their doors Joel? Are they afraid Pastor Weaver, McCurry, or Hammond are going to kick in their doors and preach a sermon to them? They aren’t afraid that white people are going to home invade, rob, rape, and murder them. It didn’t use to be like this Joel. Did you ever see the tv show Mayberry R.F.D. / The Andy Griffith Show...? Yes, it was a tv show; but that is what society used to be like. Now the cities of Christendom are like Back to the Future III or Batman Returns or Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, which depict darkness and festering evil and an overbearing feeling of oppressive terror and being subject to being ravaged by roaming bands of criminals at any moment, with no way to protect yourself and no one to help you. Do you think that is “progress”, Joel? It is happening to cities across Europe and the U.S. who hardly knew crime—and all of the sudden with the massive influx of Third-world aliens, violent crime is off the charts; yet the only thing you believe worthy of being denounced are “white racists” who are so evil as to believe that they have the right to the godly, peaceful society that their ancestors developed and passed on to them and that it is immoral to turn their nations over to the savages and force the true citizens to pay welfare so the aliens can live and breed at taxpayer expense as they destroy civilization and Christendom. The more we have absorbed nonwhites, Joel, the less Christian we have become.
You are a destroyer. You are assisting in the rape of the bride of Christ and the genocide of God’s children. You think the Master will be so pleased when He returns and finds His children on the top of the table breeding with the dogs. I think you will have a rude awakening. If one person commits suicide, jumping off a cliff, that person will be judged by God for taking his own life. Tell me, what will be the judgment for a person who conviced several thousand or million other people—who trusted him because he was a “respected” Bible scholar and pastor—to jump off a cliff with him? or like you, he convinced a myriad of other people to jump off the cliff, but didn’t jump off the cliff himself! Tell me, what do you think will be that person’s reward...? —especially since he did it “in God’s Name” as if it was “God’s Word”. God said that He would destroy those false shepherds who said, “Thus saith the Lord” —when in fact, God had NOT thus said!
One who does the very opposite of what Christ commanded and who works against Him (by scattering the flock and gathering the swine or having the sheep breed with the wolves)* is called an ENEMY. Christ said that when He returns He will command the holy angels, “bring those Mine enemies that would not that I should rule over them and slay them before Me”. You reject Christ’s rule when you adopt the world’s “morality” and you rebelliously reject and denounce the morality that God commanded, and blasphemously call it “evil”; and you declare that white Christians need to “repent”—and you encourage abominations that God forbade! Christ said MANY on the Day of Judgment will say, “but have we not done all these ‘wonderful things’ in Your Name?” and Christ will reply, “I never knew you. Depart from Me ye that work iniquity [lawlessness; anonmia**]” (Matthew 7:23).
[* “6My people hath been lost sheep: their shepherds have caused them to go astray, they have turned them away on the mountains [large nations]: they have gone from mountain to hill [small nations / people], they have forgotten their restingplace. 7All that found them have devoured them: and their adversaries said, ‘We offend not, because they have sinned against the LORD, the habitation of justice, even the LORD, the hope of their fathers’.” (Jeremiah 50)
** Those who reject God’s Law are guilty of lawlessness Joel. There is only one source of morality: The Word of God—everything that He declared, “Thou shalt not” and “This shalt thou do”. It has nothing to do with salvation. It has to be with being honorable sons who love and obey their Father. You are more like Absalom. How did Absalom honor his father? That’s what you are doing to the Family of God and that is how you honor your Heavenly Father. The Hebew names Absalom and Solomon are very similar. Solomon at least started out holy and honorable. Absalom didn’t have a very “peaceful” ending. That may be your future Joel. What’s your position on homoperversion? pedaphilia? incest? cannibalism?]
Morality does not change Joel. What God declared to be abominations 3,500 years ago still were 3,000 years later when the tiny remnant returned from Babylon. What God declared to be sin and abominations 3.500 years ago still are are today. God does not change. You do understand what the word Immutable means, don’t you? God declared the difference between good and evil, and placed a curse on those who would call evil good and good evil. That curse has landed on YOU Joel.... unless YOU repent. Morality does not change. Evil never becomes good. Abominations never become wholesome and wonderful. Homoperversion is following the EXACT SAME PATH that interracial copulation and “marriage” followed. Interracial marriage results in “confusion”.* That is the meaning of Babylon. God commands His people to be separate and to come out!
[See my, The Creation of Man in Genesis 1 and 2, 88pp., 6.00 + P&H.]
Regardless, the unspoken, maybe even unwitting underlying philosophy that you are spewing is that all whites should collectively throw themselves on the genetic hand-grenade to save the Negro (or Hispanic or other non-white) platoon! Where does Christ command the sheep to give their lives for the dogs and swine? Aliens are improved by breeding up (for that reason, mulattoes brought higher prices on the slave market and for that reason immoral slave owners polluted their own seed and sired their own mulattoes with their slave women). But will never make them “the same”—and it DESTROYS US GOD’S CHILDREN; and if all are the same why do they need to “breed up” to improve? and if they don’t need to breed up to improve then why do you promote it in violation of what God commanded? You’ve never really spent much time outside your ivory tower, have you? You’d be a “good” (that is, successful in corruption) politician. You already are one; except that you deceitfully practice your dark art within the cover of the church.
Darker colored blacks hate lighter colored blacks and that is what the entire genocide of 700,000 to over a million lighter blacks in Uganda / Ruanda was all about in 1994. Why don’t you preach against Black supremacy and Black racism and Black violence (of which there is 1,000 more than white-on-black violence)...? I’d like to know the answer to that one. Why don’t you move to Uganda and teach the dark Blacks how to stop hating the lighter blacks? The darker blacks will always hate the lighter blacks, so your encourgagement of race mixing actually leads to hatred, as well as the destruction of the different type of life that God created, “after their kind” and commanded them to keep to their kind. Even animals practice segregation (except the males when they are in rut—and then “temporary insanity” seems to be the reason. That also explains why blacks are promiscuous—even beating pit bull dogs into submission then gang raping them. Do you even know the Pandora’s Box that you are opening and unleashing upon all of Christendom...? and if so, was it for more than 30 pieces of silver...?
Allowing (or helping) the blacks to “breed up” destroys us—it destroys Christendom; and God forbade it. Have you not even studied history, let alone paid attention to current events in your lifetime, to see the swath of destruction that has been carved through Christendom by your abominable race mixing? The family is destroyed; the neighborhood is destroyed; society is destroyed; the nation is destroyed; the Church is destroyed (show me how doctrine has ever been improved by mixed-blooded preachers; it is, rather, a one-way street toward Liberalism and then Apostacy)—all of Christendom is destroyed. God’s children are murdered; Christ’s bride is raped. Does that make you proud to take part in this destruction? Does it even shock you to learn that is what you are doing? Now that you learn the possibility that this is what you are doing, should it not cause you to put the skids on your false doctrine and resulting destruction until you can properly study the issue? If you learned that some “new, wonderfully touted ingredient” may actually be a deadly poison, would you not stop serving it to your family and order your family to stop consuming it until you truly studied the matter? Maybe you wouldn’t. If you don’t love Christendom, you don’t love God, and you don’t love your family; that’s what the Word of God says (whether you like to hear those words or believe them or not; truth and reality are not altered by your hatred of God).
[He who would be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. Jesus said he who is not with Me is against me, and he who gathers not (the SHEEP) scattereth abroad. If a man loves not his kinsman whom he has seen how can he love God whom he has not seen? If you love Me keep My Commandments. Not on jot or tittle shall pass from the Law. Give not that which is holy / children’ [Israel’s] Bread [Christ] to the dogs; cast not pearls before swine. Come out from among them and be ye separate. Ever read any of these verses...?]
Colonial preacher Joel Hawes expressed, “Those who disparage a good ancestry are those who have none of their own”. Genealogies are given throughout Scripture. They are important. The N.T. passages of Paul about genealogies are falsely interpreted to refer to the genealogies of God’s people—which those passages are not talking about. The passages refer to wrangling of the BIBLICAL genealogical lists in fables, as if there is Kabbalistic (hidden meaning) in those lists beyond any reasonable, valid numeric value in the numbers and the numeric value of the names.
God does not tell us to get down in the gutter and become whores just so whores can feel better about themselves and not have someone better than themselves to cause them envy. This is what you are promoting—immorality. What you are promoting WILL carry through in the momentum that you are adding to the problem, to be used in the blasphemous attempt to Biblically justify homoperversion. Those who enter the sheepfold by any means other than the Door [Christ] is a thief and a robber. It is not “grass” that is valuable and to be guarded against being stolen inside the sheep-fold—but the sheep! Christ admits only His sheep into the sheepfold; but you have dug under the wall or busted a whole through the wall and you are letting the dogs and swine and wolves into the sheepfold! You are not a blind shepherd or even an evil shepherd—you are a swine-herder and a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Not only does Joel ignore the fact that God created each after its own kind—and COMMANDED them to produce after their own kind—he also ignores the Fall and he also ignores the outright Decretive Declarations of God, not only in His putting a difference in the very act of creation, but also concerning those racial families whom He FOREVER cursed. Joel and others (malicious or sincere) ASSUME that all races sprung from Adam and / or Noah, when it is a genetic impossibility. Their “doctrine” is humanism—many man wants reality to be, because it makes man feel good; not that which is based upon the revealed and commanded Word of God. They “assume”—but they have no Biblical support. Their support is the entire God-hating modern world and all the generations of those from whom God commanded His people to separate themselves. Joel seems to think that such mass and momentum establishes morality and reality and that God is “out voted” or “overruled” by man. Too bad Joel. That’s just as much false doctrine as the other things that you believe. YOU are the ones that will be outvoted and overruled: “If God be for us who can be against us?” The Word of God shall prevail (and it NEVER changes; MORALITY never changes): as the Old Russian proverb says: “One word of truth outweighs the whole world.” Your world, Joel, will be weighed in the balances and found wanting [lacking, deficient]...! As the old Welsh battle cry declares, Y Gwir Yn Erbyn Y Byd, “The Truth against the world!”
The Hebrew meaning of the word Adam is itself support that Adam is not the father of all races. Likewise, Eve was not the mother of “all” living (all creatures did not spring out of her womb), but the mother of all living souls from Adam, in keeping with God’s Law of “Kind After Kind”. It’s not just skin deep, Joel; do a little study.
God said that He separated His people from all other peoples even as He separated clean from unclean animals.
“24...I am the LORD your God, which have separated you from other people. 25Ye shall therefore put difference between clean beasts and unclean, and between unclean fowls and clean: and ye shall not make your souls abominable by beast, or by fowl, or by any manner of living thing that creepeth on the ground, which I have separated from you as unclean. 26And ye shall be holy unto Me: for I the LORD am Holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be Mine.” (Leviticus 20)
Understand, clean and unclean animals did not “evolve” from the same ooze—do you believe in any form, of Evolution? —including so-called “Theistic Evolution”. God separated clean animals from unclean in the very act of creation by making them different; the clean animals did not share a common origin with any unclean animals other than all being comprised of the basic minerals and gases of the elements from which all life was formed. So also did God with peoples. Those who do not share Adam’s characteristics are not Adamites (platypuses are not ducks either, in case you did not realize it). Only Adamkind did God make after His Own Image and Likeness and breathe into, giving them a spirit that survives the death of the body. This is why other peoples don’t know God. They are not His children—and God commanded His children to be separate. Your not liking what God decreed before the foundation of the world does not change God’s Decrees. Your resisting it and preaching the opposite of what Christ commanded is the action of an antichrist. God did not create 21st Century liberals and ask them how He should order His creation. You need to repent of your arrogance and rebellion aganist God.
Noah was pure in his genealogies / generations. God did not turn Ham black. God did not even curse Ham; though Ham’s sin was reprehensible (see my What Was the Mark that God Placed on Cain?, 584pp., 30.00 + P&H). Canaan was cursed because he was born of incest (how “unfair” of God to curse someone who had no choice in how he was born, huh, Joel...?—that may be how you think—or rather emote—but that is not how I think and that is not demonstrative of Reformed Theology and the Sovereignty of God and Predestination: do you believe any of those doctrines? did you ever or were you just pretending until you established yourself...?). Canaan then married a woman descended from Cain (my book, Who Was the Serpent...? & the Waters that Covered the Earth, 774pp., pb., 40.00 + P&H, explains the only way that the seed of Cain could have survived the worldwide Flood). Scripture says that God set the bounds of the nations / peoples. God forbids hybridization of crops, animals, and even mixing of fabric and clothing, or yoking an ox and an ass. Every law of God is a moral law. You must think that God adolished His racial laws (which shows that your epistimology is humanistic and flawed, and shows you do not understand the nature of God or morality)—but if you believe that, then you must also embrace all forms of gender perversion too.
[If my theology is wrong, some people have their “feelings hurt” by not being allowed to marry outside their race into the Adamic, Caucasian race. If you are wrong, you are guilty of murdering countless generations of God’s children and polluting Christ’s very bride. Which possible offense do you think is greater, Joel? Whose offense is a greater issue? God’s offense, or the offense of any man (or savages trying to destroy Christendom)...?]
Your assertion that the term inter-racial is “more properly” called inter-ethnic is another assertion also based on false, unsupported, unstated presupposition and false assumption that all races descend from Adam. A point that you have nowhere attempted to prove. You belch out opinion and the Word of God is nowhere in sight. Swedes and Norwegians are different ethnicities, but of the same race; however, Asians, Orientals, and Africans, are of different races from Swedes and Norwegians (and in many cases, from each other).
You are helping our own destruction in thinking that racial suicide pleases Jesus, while interpreting the Bible through the polluted notions of an evil world that hates God. You need to have your mind renewed. Why don’t you move to a Third World nation and “spread the love” over there? Christendom has enough enemies. If you think Third World evangelism fulfills the Great Commission why are you here enjoying the luxuries of Christendom? Why aren’t you giving your life for the dogs? That is a bit hypocritical when you expect all the white people in Christendom to simply breed ourselves out of existence and give 6,000 years of our heritage and inheritance to the aliens with whom God forbade that we have any dealings. Do you hate your ancestors that much Joel? How is that honoring your father and mother? Cursed is he that setteth light by (treats lightly, as insignificant) his father and mother.
Tell me where you learned theology. Tell me which theologians have warped your thinking to cause you to believe that God abolished His Law, that God Himself changed, that God’s Word does not endure forever, that the world dictates morality not the Word of God, that morality “changes” and that sin becomes “non-sin”, that evil becomes good and abominations become wonderful, that darkness becomes light, that pigs become sheep and serpents become dove and tares become wheat. Who’s your sugar daddy? Was it more than 30 pieces of silver? You do realize that silver or gold will melt in the fervent heat, do you not?
The fact that you even called your article “Color Line” itself shows profound ignorance. Color is merely one of the many differences between the races. Do you think tigers and zebras are the same race too? Are you that easily confused? or do you simply believe what you want to believe? God is not the author of confusion. God is not the accusor of the brethren.
Joel McDurmon, Once Repudiating Social Justice, Now Promotes It.
[The above article has some good points, but also appears to be profoundly spiritually and intellectually near-sighted in not understanding the nature and perpetuity of the Law of God; which itself is due to a defective, humanistic understanding of God Himself. The Apostle John, in one of the last books of the New Testament to be written (written even after Revelation), says, “He that saith, ‘I know Him’, and keepeth not His Commandments, is a liar, and the Truth is not in him” (I John 2:4). Rejection of God’s Law (which includes racial separation) is the reason for all the immorality in Christendom. Rejection of God’s Law is why Christendom is about to be destroyed: For God will not hear the prayers (much less receive the worship) of those who turn their ear from hearing His Law (Proverbs 28:9) and God does not hear the prayers of those who regard [embrace, rather than eschew, turn from, and confess] iniquity in their hearts (Psalm 66:18)—whether out of ignorance or wilful rebellion. R.A.B.]
Also, someone emailed the following:
Joel wrote to Pastor Weaver:
“I would be willing to meet with you and McCurry, with witnesses, on a couple conditions. First, you publicly repent of your position on interracial marriage, and then show fruit of repentance (public apologies, etc.). Second, we record the meeting. Any further negotiation can start there.”
—and to whom should Pastor Weaver pray for forgiveness...? to Joel McDurmon...? Were your ancestors Inquisitors of the Roman Catholic Church, Joel...? Were they possibly the Popes during the time of Persecution of Protestants and the Counter-Reformation? How can one “repent” of a sin when you have not even established any “thou shalt not” or “this shalt thou do”...? —when you think “God changes”. If God changed and changed the laws of morality in the past, Joel, how can we know that He has not change and changed the laws of morality again? You have given no verse from the Bible that says that interracial marriage is a command from God, that it is permissible, or that it is not a sin. It is presumption and sin for Joel to declare that interracial marriage is not sin, when no verse supports Joel’s position. In fact, God declares a curse on those who would add to or subtract from His Law. Joel’s declaration is also sin because Scripture tells us that which is not of faith is sin—and faith is founded upon the Doctrine of the Word of God, not the evil world’s dogmatic opinion of what “right” and “wrong” are. Do you believe that homoperversion is not a sin either, Joel...? Both interracial marriage and homoperversion have been considered immoral for millennia by Christian society and by the Old and New Testament upon which those Christian societies were based. Only as society has turned from the Word of God are those ABOMINATIONS embraced and those who opposed them are attacked, as you are now doing. Have you thrown down the gauntlet and told God Almighty and Christ Jesus that unless they repent of their racism, they are not welcome at any Bible conference in Joel-topia...?
I’ve been in frequent communication with Pastor Weaver for over a decade, and read his works and watched his videos a decade before that. Pastor Weaver demonstrates the Grace of a person regenerated through Christ and it is evident from talking with him for even a few minutes. You, on the other hand exude the arrogance and utter lack of social graces of the Holy Spirit of other carnal ego-maniacal ‘pretenders’. By their fruit ye shall know them. Your fruit is rancid. From only a few sentences I get the impression that you are a self-imagined Papal bully. You’ve been given a little power by being elected to the small (?) organization of which you are president (even though some claim that you are undermining the doctrine upon which that organization was founded*). You do not appear to be a Presbyterian (I haven’t heard you quote John Knox or the Westminster Confession of Faith in this matter)—but more like modernists who claim to be Presbyterian, but once they are raised to positions of prominence, the mask comes off as they slowly begin their doctrinal shift toward the left, away from the Doctrines to which the swore in their ordination (like those who attempted to destroy the church and even seminary that Dr. D. James Kennedy built).
Nor do you appear to understand Reformed Doctrine (and you seem to reject much of what R. J. Rushdoony taught). You appear to be one who creeps in unawares to steal and destroy. “By their fruit ye shall know them.” If you understood God’s Holiness and Immutability then you should know that God cannot change—that God’s Law (the only Standard of Morality) is an expression of His Nature and likewise, cannot chage—and what God declared to be sin and abominations 3,500 years ago still are sin and abominations today. God’s Law goes farther back than Sinai (that was merely the first codified, written, giving of the Law to God’s people as a collective group). God Law goes all the way back to Abraham, Noah, and Adam. That very same Law had been transmitted orally from God to Adam and then from the Patriarchs to their families; with periodic updates from God as man degenerated more and more and required being commanded not to do what he knew in his heart was wrong**—like the very things that you are saying are “wonderful”— “Yea, hath the Lord said...?”). God forbade us to cross-breed animals or crops. Are God’s very children of less importance than cows and cowpeas? Are sheep and sheep sorrel more holy that God’s very children? Why do you think Christ used the analogies of wheat and tares and sheep and wolves / pigs / swine...? By the way, Joel, when in the Kingdom (not the wild kingdom, but God’s Kingdom) Scripture says the lion and wolf shall lie down with the lamb—it isn’t talking about the honeymoon night after marriage...! and this is only once Satan and the sin nature have been banished so that no one would even consider crossing the never-changing moral boundaries that God established).
I see that Pastor Weaver quotes liberally from the Bible in his emails (as in this initial reply to you, “Pastor John Weaver responds to Joel McDurmon”, after your first article attacking Pastors Weaver, Curry, and Hammond), but liberals don’t seem to quote the Bible, especially when their position is indefensible.
** Cain was not executed because God had not yet commanded “Thou shalt not kill”. However, though God had not instituted His Law against murder, Cain indeed knew that what he had done was wrong or he would not have hid the body or lied to God (and thus we see that one sin usually leads to another; what will yours be next, Joel...? telling people that they need to “repent” of “homophobia”...?). God purposely did issue that particular Commandment until after Cain’s offense, because “though it must needs be that offenses come into the world, woe unto him by whom the offenses come”. In order for God’s Prophecy of “perpetual warfare” between the seed of the woman and the seed of the Serpent to be fulfilled, Cain had to survive and have offspring. God often has us learn the hard way. Jacob marrying Leah and Rachel (sisters) at the same time (though it was not his plan) turned out to be very troublesome, so after that God declared that a man was not to marry a woman and her sister at the same time. Similarly, sibling marriages were permissible in the times of the earliest Patriarchs; but that seems to have changed after the flood (10 generations). By Abraham’s time half-sibling marriages were permissible. However, due to the cumulative effect of genetic anomolies, after a certain time, that became destructive to the genes, God later declared in His Law how close within the family marriages can be (and the same Law forbids marrying outside the race—which never changed). And notice, also, Joel, the laws concerning how close a person could marry within his family did not become more liberal (let alone being scrapped altogether)—but became stricter...!
For more details, see my, What Was the Mark that God Placed on Cain? —Including: “The Cain-Canaan Connection,” “What Was Ham’s Sin?” “Why Was Canaan Cursed?” “Where Was Eden?” “Where Did Cain Get His Wife?” “How Did the Descendants of Cain Survive the Flood?” ...and other curious things in Scripture considered, 584pp., 30.00 + P&H; Who Was the Serpent in the Garden? and the Waters that Covered the Earth, 774pp., 40.00 + P&H, The Creation of Man in Genesis 1 and 2, 88pp., 6.00 + P&H; Kind Unto Kind: Race Mixing from God’s Viewpoint (c.1977) 6x9, 524pp., 27.50 + P&H; Races in Chaos (1959) 214pp, 6x9 pb., 16.50 + P&H; and Ten Commandments for Youth, 440pp., 6.25 x 9.25, pb., 25.00 + P&H. See also, Was Abraham’s Wife Sarah His Half-Sister?, 60pp., 5.00 + P&H. See also the following book which I stock, Whom Hath God Joined Together? A Biblical Examination of Miscegenation, Jackson 240pp., pb., 20.00 + P&H.]
Though unrelated to the primary topic of this article, the following excellent article also sheds some light on the destruction of Christendom (which Joel himself is championing):
In this article Dr. Boys shares that Bioloa University (that is, Bible Institute of Los Angeles, which was founded by Reuben A. Torrey and who served as its first president, who had formerly been President of Moody Bible Institute, and patterned Biola after that Institute) all the way back in 1988 lifted its 80 year-old ban for students concerning dancing, alcohol, tobacco, and gambling. One of the trustees, limply, and anti-intellectually justified the move, “ if Biola is known for a set of rules, then we have certainly missed our mission”. I ask, what was the “culture” that led to these changes...? The school is in Los Angeles. I don’t think that it is Scots Presbyterians who affected the change. It seems that the school gave in to complaining students. Why did they not tell the students, “You are fully free to study at another institution more in line with your ‘morals’”...? Will they also change their stance on homoperversion...? Most certainly they already have changed their stance on interracial marriage, from what it was in Torrey’s day. Surely enough, Boys reports that “In March of 2016, Biola hosted a conference called, “Love No Matter What: Politics, Sex, Race and the Way of the Cross.” Accepting homoperversion of every stripe, embracing “Black Lives Matter”, abolishing the death penalty, and other things destructive to Christendom were championed by the young, cocky, insulting, female black speaker whom the spineless, liberal president of Biola invited to speak at the conference. Since she promotes and defends homoperversion, one has to wonder what her “orientation” or “practice” includes. She even declared that 15 Evangelical presidents of white Christian colleges [although there is no such thing in our day and age] need to be fired. The 2-decade serving Dean of Students at Biola was given an ultimatum: “every effort should be made to hire and promote only minority candidates such as African-Americans, Latinos and Asians—with even more preference given to females within those categories.”
“If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (Psalm 11:3)
I imagine Reuben Torrey is before the Throne of God Almighty now crying out, “How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?” (Revelation 6:10) Dr. Torrey was not martyred—but his institution has been! And all other Christian schools, colleges, universities, institutes, academies, and seminaries are under the very same multi-cultural, gender-perverse assault (as they fall over one another in their lust to be friends of the world) while the majority of “Christians” don’t even raise an eyebrow and go back to watching criminals play with a ball in the Superbowl. Christ said that those who deny Him before man, He will deny them before His Father. Each time that “Christians” see evil and SAY NOTHING—they DENY CHRIST (but one can only see and recognize evil if he even knows what evil is; but those like Joel and all other modernists call “evil” what God declared to be good and call “good” that which God declared to be evil). Each time that “Christians” remain silent and passive when Christ would have spoken out and been active—THEY DENY CHRIST.
Someone also emailed me the following. Pastor Weaver is the one who is not smoking the foot-long cigar.