Hello, Robert, Here is a simple question which could result in a book as a response, but the real challenge is to refute it in a quick and straightforward manner.
Obama has claimed that his “Christian belief” in “Do Unto Others” is what compels him to make sure that all people are treated fairly. And he applies this to the “transgender” bathroom issue.
Can you come up with a refutation that will make sense to the great majority who know very little about the Bible—but who ARE familiar with “do unto others”, and often use it as an explanation of their “religious beliefs”...? Such people will say things like, “we don’t need long and profound explanations...we just need to treat others well.”
There is no brief, simple answer to anything except something like 2+2=4. If you want a simple, brief answer you have come to the wrong place. Simple, brief answers will convince no one except unstable persons blown about by every wind of doctrine. The facts will, if they are honest. If a 10- to 20-page detailed, comprehensive answer is too overwhelming for someone, he really is not interested in the truth. I am sure there is a rerun for him on the Nickelodeon Channel with which he can sharpen his mind.
Obama is no more a Biblical scholar than he is a Constitutional scholar, and even as his writing of executive orders are not law, his twisting of Scripture is not theology. To go to such a person for Biblical or Constitutional truth is like going to a blind man to learn how to see better, or going to a dead man to learn how to have a healthy, vibrant life, or like going to a dog to learn how to be a better human. You don’t go listen to the wolves to learn how sheep should treat wolves.
Obama’s declaration is so flawed, like trying to clean up the debris after a tornado its a trailer park, one wonders where to begin.
First of all, it is rather disingenuous and duplicitous for a man who declared by imperial decree that the U.S. is not a Christian nation, to then expect those persons whom he declared by fiat were not Christians, to behave as Christians, implying that it is their Christian duty to embrace immorality and perversion. Where is the alleged separation of Church and State, that this Destroyer is quoting the Bible to justify his homo-pervert agenda in the rule of law in our government? Is anyone scratching his head? It is so transparent—and he did say that he would be the “transparent president”. The problem is not his transparency, but the STUPIDITY of those who believe what he says since he is transparently traitorous and not even president.
Obama’s misapplication of Christ’s declaration of the Royal Law (known colloquially as the “Golden Rule”) is as flawed as a horse at the derby that has a heart attack before it can even get out of the gate when the buzzer sounds.
His application of the words of Christ is from the perspective of someone with a polluted mind and a perverse nature, and a non-existent conscience, based upon the presupposition that there really is no Christian God.
Obama is the epitomy of the Jewish Chutzpah, explained by the Jewish lawyer / author Alan Dershowitz, in the story of a child who murders his parents and then begs the court for mercy since he is an orphan. Obama essentially appeals to the words of Christ, the Son of God Who came preaching repentance, while Obama at the same time is denying and violating all the morality that Christ taught, the source of which was the Scriptures. This is truly “asking amiss” that such evil people may “consume it upon their lusts”. Amiss in Greek is kahkos* (short o) and means “diseased, evil, sick, depraved”. In context in James 4:3, these terribly immoral persons were actually praying while engaged in sin, for greater fuel to add to the fire of their sinfulness. A non-perverse mind cannot even comprehend this. Christ was not tolerant. He did not suggest tolerance. God commands judgment, rebuking, separation—ostracization!
[* To show the filth of the meaning of the Greek word translated “amiss”, kahkos is etymologically related to the Latin-based “caca” (Spanish word for doo-doo) and the English word poppycock, which comes from the Dutch meaning “soft poo”, soft, clearly indicating the freshest, and therefore, also the most foul and vile. That describes Obama in every respect.]
Obama’s use of Christ’s words is to promote tolerance—not of everything, but only of evil; and intolerance of holiness. This is the duplicity of his true religion and character, in which Sharia law considers the stealing of a pizza worthy of cutting off the hands of the thief, while the rape of thousands of Swedish and German women is to be considered a “non-issue”. By the same law those rapists should have their penis and testicles cut off as well as their hands and their tongues and their eyeballs.
Obama’s twisting of the words of Christ shows the most infantile illogic and is dependent upon the hope that those listening are as logically ignorant and Biblically blind and as utterly immoral as Obama himself.
“Do unto others” in context, first of all presupposes the existence of God—the God of the Bible, who declared His entire Law to His people, and commanded: “This is the Way, walk ye in it... turn not to left had or the right... do all the words written in this book... add not to and detract not therefrom... Be holy as I the Lord thy God am Holy.” God is Immutable and He cannot change; His Holiness cannot change; and therefore His Law, an extension of His Mind and Will and Holiness cannot change for us either.
[God never rescinded His Law (His Moral Standard)—the very thought is anti-intellectual. The majority of "Christians" merely have followed the pied pipers into apostasy and disobedience unto the Day of Judgment; thus showing that the majority of Christians are not actually Christians, for they do not know Christ's Voice, but follow the voice of another, which Christ said that His sheep would NOT do. See my books, Does God Repent? - Can God Change His Mind? and What's Keeping God from Delivering America, Britain, and Europe from Destruction?]
“Do unto others” is only within the context of the Moral Standard that God established. True theology centers around God and what God commanded. Obama denies the morality that God commanded, and then illogically and insultingly uses the words of Christ to justify disobedience to God!!! God commanded His people to be separate from other peoples. “Do unto others” applies ONLY to God’s people doing unto other of God’s people—not aliens; not God’s enemies. It is curiously glaring in its absence that Obama never lectured all of his Muslim nation friends that Muslim nations should give white Christians equal rights, and “do unto them”, and allow white Christians to move to their nations, live for free on state tax money, and be given the right to vote and even be elected to public office—even giving them a free seat—and then allow the white Christians to change the Arab / pseudo-Persian and Muslim way of life into a Caucasian Christian society. Why is that? Because it is a one-way street and the purpose is not egalitarianism and utopia but to destroy us. If multiculturalism, homoperversion, and interfaith is such a “wonderful thing” then why don’t the nonchristian, nonwhite nations “show us the way” and show us how “wonderful” and how “successful” and how “desireable” that it is? —because doing such would cause them to be even greater failed states than they already are. Without our technology and trade status with us, they could never even be considered “developing” nations (which is a euphemism for “Third World hell-hole).
Obama’s declaration is tantamount to declaring, “since murderers and rapists would not want to be caught and prosecuted for their crimes, therefore, as a Christian, you should not prosecute them”. Only a pot-smoking degenerate would actually think that such logic would fool a true Christian. But he knows that the majority of “Christians” are not really Christian; and the majority of true Christians are cowards (who stand up and cheer at a football game and do nothing while our women are being raped and our politicians are giving our nation wholesale to aliens).
“Do unto others” is only to be understood within the moral framework that God commanded, and it has nothing to do with man. It has to do with God. To kill another Adamite is to destroy the Image of God in which Adamkind was made (and only Caucasians legitimately descend from Adam). The same goes for rape, assault, theft. Every sin is first and foremost against God. If a man assaulted one of Abraham's slaves, the crime was not against the slave, but against his master. So it is with us and God. That is viewed as an insult by depraved hearts and minds of humanists who think that the world should revolve around man. However, that status of being a slave of God is also our hope, for when He comes to render Judgment and take Vengeance, it will be because the crime has been committed against HIM first and foremost—and He will avenge us with the full force of the crime being committed against HIM! as a man defends his bride, as a man defends his son. Likewise, on Judgment Day, Christ told us that He will declare that even in as simple a matter as giving a cool glass of water to a kinsmen who is thirsty: “when ye have done it unto the least of these MY BRETHREN, ye have done it unto Me and when ye have not done it unto the least of these MY BRETHREN, ye have NOT done it unto Me”.
Furthermore, if an Adamite realizes that His sins against the Law of God are first and foremost against Him, that should cause a true Christian to not sin for an even higher reason.
However, the bottom line is that alien peoples should not be allowed to live among us by God’s Very Command, and “do unto others” does not apply to them (for they should not be there; their very presence is a sin against God). “Do unto others” applies only to Biblical “neighbors” (kinsmen) and brethren is not a term that can be “spiritualized” the Greek word means “from the same womb” (#80 adelphos); as in Matthew 25:40: “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these My brethren, ye have done it unto Me”. The Hebrew word translated neighbour #7453 rey-aw implies a literal meaning of “fellow sheep”; for its root is #7462 raw-aw, which means, “to tend a flock”.
This does NOT mean that we are then free to do whatever we want to aliens; but it does mean that they should be prosecuted for their crimes; it does mean they should not be given “equality” (and if someone has to be “given” equality that is a clear sign he is inferior to begin with); and it does mean that we should not love them, not do good unto them, not intermarry with them, not be friends with them, and not seek their peace or prosperity forever—by God’s Very Command! THAT is what the Bible says. The reason that Obama comprehends neither the Scriptures or our Constitution is because he is an alien and an antichrist.
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other.” —John Adams
When Adams, the Founders, the Puritans and Pilgrims used the word “religion” they used the word as a synonym for Christianity: for they believed that there was only one true religion.
Islam was well known in the days of our Founders—for they were not ignorant of history as the majority of those in Christendom today are, WHO HAVE PURPOSELY BEEN DUMBED DOWN SO THAT THEY WILL FORGET. Jefferson even secretly, “unofficially” sent a Navy commando unit to rescue Americans taken prisoner and being tortured and used as slave labor in North Africa.* NONE of the Founding Fathers or Puritans or Pilgrims equated Islam (or any other pagan superstition) as being "religion", even though it cannot be denied that Muslims are very devout to the perverse ideology that they believe.
[* Pirate Coast: Thomas Jefferson, First Marines, & Secret Mission of 1805, Zacks, 432pp., new pb., 16.00 + P&H; Hb. good used copies available for 20.00 (reg. 26.00) + P&H.]
Why are we dumbed down?
“It is impossible to enslave mentally or socially a Bible-reading people. The principles of the Bible are the groundwork of human freedom.” —Horace Greeley
“I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform them!” —Thomas Jefferson
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free...it expects what never was and never will be.” —Thomas Jefferson
“A well-instructed people alone can be permanently a free people.” —James Madison”
And contrary to Obama’s constitutional “mental bowel movement” in declaring that the Constitution is a “living, breathing, changing document” (again, showing he understands the Constitution no better than he understands the Bible, which he understands not at all, being a blind dog), a real U.S. President (not an Anti-president or Presidential Imposter) Thomas Jefferson declared:
“On every question of construction of the Constitution let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.”
Obama is not a legal scholar, though he is touted as one, and people fawn over him because he can walk upright, wear clothes, and talk—and because he is declared to be an “expert” by the self-proclaimed “experts” and so the average “sheeple” simply believe it, though Obama’s records were sealed and no one from Harvard even remembers him. He is not a scholar. He is a Destroyer, a Demolition Man posing as a renovation expert; and he is not really competent in that field either; he is merely the “front man”, the “salesman”; doing what his handlers bid him as best he can while attempting to maintain the illusion that he is competent in anything. None of our Founders ever said the Constitution was a living, breathing document. It was set in stone just like the Scriptures and Jefferson intimated if it was ever subverted bloodshed was required to restore it; even every 20 years if necessary! The subverting of the Constitution is actually a crime—High Treason. High Treason carries the death penalty.
Obama’s declaration, therefore, is prima facie evidence of High Treason (as is about every other thing that he has done while unlawfully polluting the highest office in the land).
“Do unto others” also parallels “you reap what you sow”. Those who turn a deaf ear to those of their kinsmen being TRAMPLED by the corrupt government and RAPED by alien immi-grunts God says in the day when they cry out in distress, that HE WILL TURN A DEAF EAR TO THEM. If we do nothing when we see PERVERSION in our very faces—the Love of God dwelleth not in us!—will will reap what we have sown. God commanded SEPARATION. Since we have rebelled against Him in not being separate as commanded, God essentially declared, “Okay, you want integration with aliens—I’ll give you integration with aliens!” just like He sent quail to His wicked, rebellious, ungrateful, faithless people, 3 feet thick for several miles around the entire camp, and they soon LOATHED IT, even puking it out their nostrils.
Do unto God as you would have God do unto you. To use a blunt expression with a new twist, “It’s called ‘obedience’ and ‘honor’, stupid!”
Here are the choices:
“I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you Life and Death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose Life, that both thou and thy seed may live” (Deuteronomy 30:19)
“17Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, 18And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.” (II Corinthians 6)
“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to Me: seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” (Hosea 4:6)
All those who do not stand up and verbally reject and oppose all the evil and perversion in our land DENY CHRIST—and Christ will deny them on the Day of Judgment and spew them out of His Mouth (they will have no part in Him) and they will hear Him declare:
“Depart from Me ye that work iniquity [anomas; “lawlessness”] I never knew you.”
Those who do not stand up and rebuke evil and perversion are accomplices in those crimes and abominations. John wrote,
“10If there come any unto you, and bring not this Doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: 11For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.” (II John 1)
Even giving a well-wish of blessing, “I wish you well, take care, drive safely, God bless” to those brethren who reject Christ and Sound Doctrine causes one to share in their evil deeds—so what does that say for a person who turns an indifferent, cowardly blind eye to blatant evil and perversion and corruption and immorality? It is a denial of Christ. How can a person be a follower of Christ if that person remains silent when Christ would have spoken out against such evil? Ignore evil in society... you reap what you sow. Why should God deliver us from what we are willing to tolerate? He won’t. He will allow it to destroy those who refused to speak out!
Obama is not president; he never was. He was a foreign dictator and every congressman and senator or other governmental official who did not challenge him and demand that all of his records be provided are accomplices in Sedition and High Treason. No bill he signed into law (including LGBT Pride Month which would be better known as PERVERT CELEBRATION MONTH) and no Executive Order is valid (Executive Orders themselves are unconstitutional and illegal); they are fictions of law.
“All human laws which contradict His Laws [Bible], we are bound by conscience to disobey.”
[George Mason (1725-92; American statesman who held great influence; authorof the Declaration of Rights while serving as a member of the Constitutional Convention in 1776; member of the Federal Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 and took an active part in drafting the United States Constitution).]
“All laws [rules & practices] which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 180)
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.” (Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, 2nd Ed., Section 177)
[Also, realize that Islam is not a tolerant force. What is the purpose then of the homo-perversion celebration? It gets all of the perverts out of the closet dancing in the streets to weaken Christian nations so that when Islam takes over, the perverts will have outed themselves and be easy for the Muslims to liquidate in their Jihad.]
I am surprised that Obama did not declare, upon the tragic shooting at the Cincinnati Zoo, “If I had a son, he would have looked like Harambe.” I guess not all black lives matter.
The other person answered:
Hello, Robert, I read what you wrote about the Golden Rule. I think what you are saying is that many seemingly simple concepts are not really all that easy to understand, once they are viewed in the context in which they appear in the Bible. And, if one does not understand the context, then one will not be able to grasp what is really meant.
No, what I am saying is that the concepts are extremely simple but sinful man muddies them to twist them into saying what he wants them to say. What I am saying is, that like many areas of truth, like an iceberg, the greater amount of the information lies beneath ones view so that a person who has never truly studied does not have a clue that the topic is so detailed; but the information is very easy to understand. It is not rocket science. It is not a matter of the intellect but the will—and man’s carnal will (not to be confused with any notion of “free will”*) resists Divine Truth because it is humanist (and that is the means by which God accomplishes His Will—“it is God that worketh in you both to will and do of His Good Pleasure”).
[* The problem with rejecting or confusing or twisting Election/Predestination is HUMANISM. That is the epicenter and pathology of all false doctrine: Looking at oneself in the mirror, rather than looking at God. If one wished to use a very limited, mundane comparison, it could be termed, “Divine ‘Gas-lighting’.” Sinful man, either utterly ignorant of Sound Doctrine, or rejecting Sound Doctrine, deludedly imagines that he is his own moral “free agent” and that he makes all his own choices and determines his own destiny—and that Divine Delusion is the means by which God accomplishes His Will in assuring that such a person “earns” his Rejection and Judgment. God predestined the elect unto salvation and the nonelect unto perdition from before the foundation of the world. He then gave each a nature suited to assuring his individual destiny, and controlled every minute event in each’s life to bring him to that end.]
I do agree with this. What I am wondering about is how to get the message across to one who does not even understand the basics about identity,
This has nothing to do with identity. But if you want someone to understand the basics of identity you teach him the basics of identity. This has simply to do with interpreting what God says according to what He says, not according to what sinful man wants it to say. The issue here is not identity, but the Doctrine of God’s Sovereignty and the Doctrine of God’s Immutability and the Doctrine of God’s Perfection. God does not change. All that exists He owns. It is His Right to do with what is His (everything) as He wills; to establish morality; to choose His people—and those things never change. Anyone who thinks that any verse says anything contrary is confused and taking such passages out of context because God cannot lie, make a mistake, break a Promise or unconditional Covenant or change His Mind.
...to say nothing about the real meaning of who it is to whom the entire Bible is addressed. One cannot begin by saying, “the Sermon on the Mount is only addressed to repentant Israelites”, because those who do not fit into both these categories are almost certain to misunderstand what is really meant.
One does not have to use such specific language as I did, or as you do above, to those who are in ignorance any more than Christ spoke plainly to whom He was speaking. Christ spoke only in parables in public because it was His Will that the masses not understand. Those of His flock still in ignorance, the Holy Spirit would then, according to God’s Determination and Time Table, open the eyes of the elect, and will then eventually draw some of those into deeper understanding, by causing them to seek more truth and submit to it when it is revealed. Thus, all one has to do is use Biblical words: God chose only one people; He commanded the to be separate from all other peoples. He forbade helping aliens or doing good unto them or intermixing with them. Then, as I explained, our only neighbors should be our own people. God is Immutable. Morality never changes. Those who think Morality or God change don’t know the True God and are following a false religion of the Apostate end-time “Church” that has replaced the true Church in the vast majority of cases throughout all of Christendom. Again, as I have said, as a safe rule of thumb: If you want to know what God loves and commands, but don’t understand the Bible or are too lazy to read it, just look and see what the world hates, demonizes, villifies, and attacks. If you want to know what God hates and forbids, but don’t understand the Bible or are too lazy to read it, just look and see what the world hates, loves, celebrates, and legislatively protects. In the eyes of the world, there are only about 3 major unforgiveable sins: “racism” (if you are white), so-called “homophobia”, and not celebrating all religions as equal. Those are things God commands; therefore, their opposite is what is immoral; hence that is why the world promotes the opposite of what God commanded and why the world hates those who obey God. That is why they want to exterminate us, and even “in in the Name of God”—a God they do not even know (I John 2:4; Matthew 7:23; John 16:2,3).
The detailed explanation of the issue concerning to whom Christ was speaking would not become an issue until someone tried to bring the dogs into the assembly / sheepfold. However, Christ spoke to a mixed multitude out in public. All were free to hear, but not all were free to understand.
It is not that there is no way to refute Obama’s simple declaration concerning the transgender issue, without first getting the average person to commit himself to what amounts to a lifelong study, which will challenge most of his sacred cows. However, the pivotal issue of the explanation is not hingent upon the truth, but upon the general ignorance of the person whom you are trying to teach. If such a person has a good, solid understanding of the Bible and Doctrine, things will “click” quite easier. The general ignorant person who only knows the humanistic Bible “teaching” that he has heard, of course, is greatly handicapped. But Christ is still in the business of opening blind eyes and ears—and that is the very reason why He healed such physical ailments (and even raised the dead) to parallel the spiritual healing and resurrection.
I don’t know how you are confusing what I said with what you said. I mentioned nothing about identity. I mentioned that Obama was twisting the Word of God and interpreting it hypocritically and dishonestly through a perverse mind, rejecting the morality that Christ commanded, while claiming to “champion” Christ’s teaching to do unto others. However, in reality, he was not championing Christ’s teaching—he was attempting to blackmail Christians into observing “do unto others” in relation to invading enemies (though he did not attempt to teach that same morality to the invading enemies). The irony, as I mentioned, is that after saying that the U.S. was not a Christian nation (based solely upon his Imperial Edict), but then appealing to the Christian nation to keep Christian doctrine (with his own perverted twist).
The “doing unto others” is not interpreted in light of humanism, but within the morality that God established. Christ would not tell us to give our blessing on those committing open abominations any more than Jacob should have given his blessing to Esau. We are not to even bid Godspeed to those who reject the true Christ (the full morality and Doctrine that He taught) and we are to even bid our peace to return unto us, and shake the very dust off our sandals as testimony against those who reject Christ. This has nothing to do with lifelong study. It has simply to do with the understanding that God is Holy. He revealed to us what that Holiness entails, and everything else is to be interpreted in light of that. You are muddying the waters yourself with other issues.
That is what I fear about a friend. He is likely to balk when certain ideas are presented in your book, Uncovering..., even though he knows the truth about the the Jews.
I realize that you are trying to plan for eventualities, but lay the groundwork, pray, and God will take care of the eventualities. Don’t withhold the truth from a child of God because of how you think the person may react. You are not the Holy Spirit. You are not the Harvester of Souls; you are to be faithful and plant seed. Instead of fearing, pray that God opens his eyes and continue to pray, but trust God to open his eyes.
And yet that might very well be the truth of the whole matter... and for this reason, perhaps, many will fall for the trap, and support “being kind to people” as the ultimate answer.
If any people fall into that trap then they are FOOLS who don’t know the Word of God because they don’t read it or they threw half of it out. Plant the seed. Either they are ordained unto life and God will have the spark that you sow come to life; or they are ordained unto perdition and God will cause the truth to drive them away to their destiny. Regardless. Preach the truth. You don’t have the right to withhold it. It may be what God uses to turn them around. If they can’t comprehend simple passages like, “Shouldest thou help the ungodly and do good unto them that hate the Lord?” and “He who says I know Him and keepeth not His Commandments is a liar and the truth is not in him” —then they are godless who delude themselves into thinking that they are spiritual. This is the litmus test whether someone is converted: He recognizes Christ as Lord BY OBEYING HIM! not by thinking that Jesus loves faggots and that He thinks homoperverion is “cool”.
You need to stop fearing and start trusting God to run His universe. There is nothing deep or mysterious in the Golden Rule. You read something other than what I wrote. God gave us the list of rules for morality. To suggest that we don’t have to obey Him and that He is just as happy with us if we obey Him as if we disobey Him, is delusional—yet that is what most “Touched By An Angel” “Christians” think (if it can even be called “thinking”). Even as I have pointed out in several books of mine which you have read: Paul said all things are lawful for me but not all things are expedient. Only someone in the profoundest of delusion would think that Paul was saying that he could commit homo-perversion if he wanted to and it would be lawful. Paul was saying, in the formal, full form of his declaration: “All things that are lawful are lawful for, but that doesn’t mean it is proper for me to do them, because it might cause another weaker brother to stumble”. This has nothing to do with “freedom to sin”. It has to do with doing things that are lawful (having a glass of wine, buying meat in the marketplace even though it is kosher or halal certified and dedicated to a demon god, etc.)—if you live in a society polluted with aliens and that type of meat may be pretty much all that is available. False gods don’t exist. There is only one God. Therefore, those who know this can eat with undefiled conscience, since it was sacrificed to nothing! However, weaker, newer Christians who may have come out of paganism, might not yet understand this, so for their sakes, you should not do such things in their presence.
IN THE EXACT SAME VEIN, “Do unto others” is not talking about doing whatever depraved perversion that another person would want you to do to him, but it is only referring to that which is within the bounds of what God declared to be lawful and pleasing to HIM.
“Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men [kinsmen—the only men whom we should do good unto, the only men among whom we should live] should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is [the fulfillment* of] the Law and the Prophets.” (Matthew 7:12)
[* That is, it is a fulfillment of God’s Law to do what is right, and the prophets declared that God would write His Law upon the hearts of His people.]
This is the entire impetus for keeping the whole Law of God: because we reap what we sow (which is a corollary of “do unto others as you would have others do unto you”). As I have explained in other books, If we love God we will not rob our kinsmen, rape his daughter, murder his son, or commit adultery with his wife, etc. If we love our kinsmen we will not rob him, rape his daughter, murder his son, or commit adultery with his wife, etc. If we don’t want our kinsmen to rape and murder us, then we should not rape and murder our kinsmen. There is no deep dark mystery. Furthermore, our duty is firstly to God, secondly to our kinsmen; therefore, it is impossible for us to “do unto others” within the context of also being obedient to God—if that “doing unto others” involves letting them sin flagrantly without judgment. There are two parties to every sin: the perpetrator and the victim. We violate what God commanded if we do not stand up for the victim and demand the perpetrator to be judged.
God said if we turned a deaf ear to the cry of the poor (needy, oppressed), God would turn a deaf ear to us when we cried in need (and He would also make certain that our kinsmen turn a deaf ear to us in our time of need). You reap what you sow.
“Do unto others.” God said that if we allowed sin to flourish unchallenged in the community then the whole community will suffer. Thus, if we don’t want all society to be destroyed because of our sin, we should want someone to rebuke us if we are in sin, and turn us from not only our own destruction, but from causing the destruction of our entire community if they refuse to put our sin out from among them if we refuse to repent. That is the meaning of “do unto others”—it refers only to legitimate kinsmen; and it refers to what is right; not what a depraved, immoral person would want done unto him.
There is safety in a multitude of counsellors—but not simply any fool who is hired to play the role of counsellorm, as in modern politics—there is only safety in the multitude of WISE, GODLY counsellors. Rehoboam listened to the young, foolish, carnal counsellors, his cohorts and friends, not the older, wiser, proven counsellors—and the nation therefore was split and Rehoboam lost 5/6s of the kingdom; and that 5/6s then lived in wickedness without a godly leader!
Likewise, the perspective of “do unto others” is intended to be understood from a GODLY mindset, not the mindset of a degenerate psychopath whose mentality is, “I really don’t care whether all of society is destroyed because of my actions or not. I am doing to do whatever is good for me. Therefore, if others are going to “do unto me”, then they should just let me sin as perversely as I want because I would let them sin as perversely as they want. THIS IS NOT WHAT “DO UNTO OTHERS” means. It means,
“Do unto others [of your kinsmen] AS GOD HAS COMMANDED you to live in godliness in all areas WHEN HE SAID “BE HOLY FOR I AM HOLY”. I would want others to do right by me in light of God’s Standards of Morality, therefore, I should likewise live honorably and obediently as God commanded, in order to obey and honor God and so that I do not wrong my kinsmen according to the letter and the spirit of God’s entire Law.”
The moral of this story: Don’t listen to a jackass give advice or lectures on the Constitution or the Bible or even barnyard etiquette!