—Ruminate on this — Hard Sayings — Timely Truths — Democracy is Communism; Meaning of Words “Whosoever Will” / “World” in Bible; How Christian Bakers & Florists Should Handle Issues that Violate Conscience and How To Keep Politicians on a Tight Leash

By on

He who has ears to hear... let him hear here...

[This contains 4 sections of separate, but related Ruminations on The Weapon of Unconstitutional, Unchristian Immigration and the Corrupt, Treasonous Politicians Who Wield it to Destroy Christendom.]
#1 - “Democracy” = Socialism
#2 - The Mind Purgative of God’s Word — WHO is the “Whosoever Will...?” / What Do the Words “All”, “Every”, and “World” mean in Scripture...?
#3 - Christians and the Issue of Gay Wedding Cakes and Floral Arrangements
#4 - Questions to be Routinely Asked—while Administering Truth Serum and Polygraph—to ALL Government Employees, Politicians, Judges, etc. — How They Can Be Kept On a Tight Leash
#1 - “Democracy” = Socialism
This is a good short message by Frank Wright:
These are my comments:
Those who have been raised from infancy and marinated in Evolution... what else can they embrace but socialism...?  All they understand is a godless totalitarianism which, in essence, declares, “Might is Right”—IF THEY are the ones with that Might to exercise—(which, hypocritically, is the very same behaviour that they demonize when it is any others who are exerting their might; bullies turn into crybabies when their victims fight back).  Back when they were the minority, they claimed the Majority and Might and Force and Discrimination and Intolerance were evil—but once they have the mass, they violate everything that they condemned, 10-fold more than any abuse they ever suffered.
Communism is the method by which those who are immoral, those who are non-achievers and non-producers, attempt to steal everything from those who are the achievers and producers, and who most often live by a moral code.
The subsequent generations of dumbed-down, brainwashed, dechristianized anti-intellectual achievers and producers—and the non-achievers and non-producers alike—are first seduced with the fairy tales of “equality”, cotton-candy notions of “humanity”, the “basic goodness of man” and “meliorism” dispensed by the sugar-plum fairies of socialism.  It is truly amazing how anyone can expect to be equal receivers without being equal sharers in the work.  I guess children’s parable / fable of “The Little Red Hen” was placed on the list of “Banned Literature” a few decades ago, and the majority of those who have been raised from infancy over the past several generations are entirely ignorant of the simple truth in that children’s story.  I imagine that they are equally as ignorant of George Orwell’s classic Animal Farm* (1946)—which has also probably been on the same list of “Banned, Hate Literature”.
[* Both the 50th anniversary edition pb., as well as the animated movie DVD version are in stock; inquire.]
But, all that one has to do is study Communism (the facts, not the modern “face-lifted” air-brushed, fictionalized propaganda) of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, or the earlier Bolshevik Revolution in France (erroneously called, respectively, the Russian Revolution and the French Revolution) and see what their fruit was and the means by which that fruit was produced (which was more like the crushing of grapes to steal the wine, than actually producing any fruit).  
[Inquire for books and booklets that I write and / or reprint on these topics of the real nature of communism.]
This in itself is hypocritical of what these “liberals” actually claim to believe and champion.  This is the blind, foggy alley that leads from a Republic, through “democracy” to the actualization of socialism.
Those who have been raised godlessly (God not being in their thoughts, a factor not even in their equation) then have nothing to guide them and no core values, no concept of morality other than such substitute notions that they invent themselves or have had forced on them from childhood—and which they then attempt to FORCE on others (while shrieking of the “injustice” and “insult” of those who attempt to share traditional values with anyone; or to even hold those values themselves).  Such is their anti-intellectual ignorance and immoral, dishonest hypocrisy.  It is evidence of their being brainwashed from childhood.  Many believe concepts of history, philosophy, true Law, economics, race, theology, etc., that they have never actually studied.  They merely know the propaganda that has been drilled into them from childhood (school, media, entertainment, even advertisements)—and most would probably get into a fight with (or even commit greater crimes against) anyone who disagrees with them, over issues of which they are utterly ignorant, and only have their own hypocritical, emotional bigotry as their modus operandi, having never even studied the facts of any issue from anywhere but their propagandizers.  Now that they have the numbers and the power, they think that no one has any rights but them; and “minority rights” when the minorities become the majority are then changed to “majority rule”.  This is how nations are destroyed.
Therefore, in their minds, the only right is that of the Highwaymen, the Insurrectionists, the successful Terrorists.  “Right” in their corrupt minds, is established by force by those who are able to hijack a government (jettisoning most of its citizens and true heirs) and steer it to suit their own desires and meet their own needs, which inevitably is accomplished by steamrolling over all those in the way—the very ones from whom the government was hijacked; in addition to many of the very ones who helped them to hijack it.  Once hijacked, “right of ownership” of the ship of state is considered to belong to the most ruthless and conniving (or should that ben “kniving”?) of the invaders who attempt to back-stab and carry out pre-emptive strikes against the current illegitimate possessors (no honor among thieves)—and true to their nature, the wolves and hyenas inevitable turn on each other in their fight to claim exclusive right to the carcass.
[I believe it was the movie, “The Italian Job” that showed such betrayal most novelly.]
That’s how communism operates: competing factions actually warring against, liquidating their own party.  This is what American politics is turning into—aided by uncontrolled immigration for the leftists to outvote true Americans.  In totalitarian hypocrisy, the full-bloom of communism is revealed when the utopian motto of “the needs of the few must give way to the needs of the many” is bulldozed over into, “the needs of the many will be crushed by the desires of the few at the helm of the hijacked government”.
The young Cuban school children singing praises of Fidel Castro on the anniversary of his death certainly reminds me of the young school children that Anti-presient Obama schemed to have sing his praises during his illegal defilement of this nation’s highest office.  See also this other story which fits hand in glove:
So-called “democratic” (pseudo-speak for “communist”) governments seek to become the provider of all the people’s needs (which, in reality, is only the “first stage” of their plan, which lasts only until they have total control) and get them to be entirely dependent on the state; and keep them in a perpetual state of need, fear, and chaos.  Then, the masses drunk on the immoral, anti-intellectual wine of Babylon believe that they can circumvent God’s Law of the Harvest, the Laws of Nature that God established (you reap what you sow), including the circumvention of the Law of Physics, the First Law of Thermodynamics, known also as the Law of the Conservation of Energy and Matter;* and they mindlessly believe that some goose will magically lay golden eggs.  Such people themselves are godless and immoral because the truth is that there is no “free lunch”.  The laws of physics and reality are not suspended, circumvented, or changed simply because anti-intellectual, immoral people think that they can solely by their “will power” cause reality to change to please them.  What they irrationally and rabidly advocate and participate in is called theft (often accomplished by murder): taking wealth from producers to give to nonproducers (government officials and employees, those on welfare, illegals, to alien nations, etc.).
[* The amount of energy and matter (different forms of the same thing) is fixed / constant.  In any chemical or mechanical action or reaction, no energy or matter is destroyed and no new energy or matter is created.  In essence, at the end of Creation God “shut the door” on energy and matter and the universe is a “closed” system.]

Thomas Jefferson, true visionary, said it succinctly: “Government big enough to provide everything that you need is big enough to take everything you own.”  That is the true goal of “democratic” states.  Those who understand this, in Clintonesque fashion, clamor ruthlessly for the top positions in government.
Those non-producers* (a.k.a. welfarites: aliens and so-called “white trash” alike) who ignorantly (like parasites) participate in the “democratic” [or more properly “communist”] overthrow* of Republics will be rewarded by the established Socialist State by being forced at gunpoint to become producers, or be shot in the back of the head, literally bulldozed over by tanks, or left to starve to death.  Such is the glamorous, behind-the-scenes reality of the road to and terminus of socialism.  
[* —by weakening the nation by being a continual moral and economic drain, decade after decade, voting for the democrat that gives them the most “free stuff”;** swamping a nation with illegitimate voters.  Useful idiots are dispensed with when they are no longer useful.  All the nonproducers (re)produce are more nonproducers, as they are kept alive and well to pass on their worthless genes (all in violation of evolution’s core principles of “Survival of the Fittest” and “Natural Selection”, which the God-haters and socialists all champion) as they remain, generation after generation after generation (in addition to the aliens) on a tax-payer funded breeding program.
** Those on welfare and those on the government payroll should not be allowed to vote, since it is a clear conflict of interests: getting enough people to vote in favor of taking away the wealth of the people who vote differently.]
One of the steps and strategies (planned, not “accidental”) is the importation of chaos to destabilize stabile nations that could not otherwise be defeated from without.  This describes the immigration policy and unconstitutional introduction and enforcement of pseudo-legislation—which protects criminals (politicians especially) and has left law-abiding, true citizens exposed and defenseless—over the past 100 years (since the corrupt politicians changed the immigration policy to a majority from the Third World).
Any politician or journalist or educator who blathers the stupidity and falsehood (repeated brainwashing, regardless of who mindlessly spews it into the air waves) that the U.S. a “democracy” is either a FOOL or a COMMUNIST CONSPIRATOR (part of the sedition against the true government—the true people—which is also High Treason).  Our Founders established us as a Christian, Constitutional Republic.  THEY SAID THAT THEY PURPOSELY did NOT give us a democracy—because (guess what?) democracies are subject to corruption and are therefore short lived.  In fact, the U.S. Constitution explicity mandates, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government”… (Article IV., Section 4)
Is it any surprise, then, that our once-safe and prosperous nation, the one-time Puritan-born “city set on a hill”, which was an example to the world, is now a dunghill by a hole, teetering on the brink of destruction (from which even many rats and roaches are fleeing, as they often must do after they subvert a once-stable nation, once they realize that the frankensteinish monster that they created cannot be controlled as they had imagined*)...?
[* The Steinbeckian adage, “the best-laid plan of mice and men” is nothing other than a marshmallowy substitute for the harsher reality of God’s Law of the Harvest: “You reap what you sow” because “God will not be mocked”, “the curse causeless shall not come”, and “be sure your sin will find you out”.]
When the last bulwark of Christendom falls, Christendom will cease to exist (except as a hated memory which the haters will continually attempt to stamp out by brutal genocide—just imagine “Planet of the Apes”, the French Revolution, and the Bolshevik Revolution rolled into one).  TRUE Christians will quickly find themselves on the endangered species list—but not the “Protected” endangered species list.  It will, rather, be “open season” all season long (no license needed, no limit).  Those who are not true Christians will simply continue to blend in and be friends with the world as they have done their whole lives; and thus demonstrate that they are, in reality, “the enemies of God” and not Christians.  Rather than hearing the Deliverer and Judge declare, “Welcome thou into the joy of thy Lord”, they shall hear, “depart from Me ye cursed, I never knew you”.
God save us.  Maranatha!
Lord sent a pestilence on the wicked and send Your Holy Spirit of conviction and repentance upon Your people and may 1,000 fall at their side and 10,000 at their right hand (Psalm 91), but let the plague not come nigh unto them, because Thou hast put in their hearts and minds to trust you, recognize Your Lordship and truly repent, submit to, and obey all that You have commanded.  Reveal to them that morality never changes.  You did not abolish Your Law.  The Law was never for salvation.  It is the Moral Code by which You commanded Your people to live throughout all their generations forever.  Our violation of it is what has resulted in the invasion and destruction of Christendom.
#2 - The Mind Purgative of God’s Word — WHO is the “Whosoever Will...?” / What Do the Words “All”, “Every”, and “World” mean in Scripture...?
“9Wherewithal shall a young man cleanse his way? by taking heed thereto according to Thy Word.  10With my whole heart have I sought Thee: O let me not wander from Thy Commandments.” (Psalm 119)
The above is a meritorious, timely article, though qualified with my comments (mind purgative) below.
In John 6 Christ purposely spoke hard things so that some would stop following Him.
“60Many therefore of His disciples, when they had heard this, said, ‘This is an hard saying; who can hear it?’
61When Jesus knew in Himself that His disciples [not the twelve disciples, but the greater crowd of “followers”, that is, “would-be” disciples] murmured at it, He said unto them, ‘Doth this offend you?
62What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where He was before?
63It is the [Holy] Spirit that quickeneth [initiates new life]; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are Spirit, and they are Life.
64But there are some of you that believe not’.  For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray Him.
65And He said, ‘Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto Me, except it were given unto him of My Father’.
66From that time many of His disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.
[Early “Arminianists” who won’t be told that they have no “free will” or innate “basic goodness”.]
67Then said Jesus unto the twelve, ‘Will ye also go away?’
68Then Simon Peter answered him, ‘Lord, to whom shall we go?  Thou hast the words of Eternal Life.’
69And we believe and are sure that Thou art that Christ, the Son of the Living God’.
[“Yaaaay Peter!”]
70Jesus answered them, ‘Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?*’
[* Every time in the KJV that the word “devils” (plural) appears, it is a mistranslation, it is not devils (diabolon) but demons (daimon [with a long o, as in "hope"]).  Every time other than this verse, that the word devil appears, it should be capitalized, for it refers to Satan.  However, this instance calls Judas a devil.  Judas was a Canaanite imposter, Canaan (father of the Canaanites) married a woman descended from Cain himself, and Cain was “of the Wicked One”.  Satan actually entered Judas before the betrayal.  For more details, see my books, Who Was the Serpent in the Garden? and What Was the Mark that God Placed on Cain?]
71He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray Him, being one of the twelve.”
That is one purpose of the truth—to offend; to weed out the chaff and the tares.... to eliminate toxins / foreign substances from the body.  That also was the reason that Judas was chosen: chosen not unto life, but unto destruction: “For it must needs be that offenses come into the world” (why...? —because that is what God ordained and His Will is unavoidable and inevitable reality)... “but woe unto him by whom the offenses come; for such, it would be better that they had never been born”.  “If you are not with Me, you are against Me.”  “Vessles of wrath fitted [prepared, created] to destruction”.
“7And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, 8In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: 9Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power.” (II Thessalonians 1)
“It is a fearful thing to fall into the Hands of the Living God.”  God ordains all.  Those who complain about it not being fair that God is Master of His Universe—rather than submitting to Him, merely show what God ordained; and that is why they have no fear of God and demand that man be recognized as master of his own destiny (which is humanistic false doctrine).
The majority of “Christians” are not with Christ, because they preach “another gospel” (and thus, according to Scripture, are accursed) and work with the world toward the world’s agenda.  Those whose wills are not broken on top of the Rock of Offense, It shall fall upon them and grind them into powder.  Cotton-candy pseudo-Christianity has Christ coming back, skipping and smiling and festooning flower petals from an ivory basket while singing “All you need is love”.  That is “another gospel” and those who believe it will one day attempt to hide themselves under rocks and debris from the Wrath of the Lamb.  That will be a “Wake-up Call” to reality, a true “rude awakening” for the majority of “Christians”; but the time for repentance will have passed, and the time for Judgment begun.
How sane is it to invite into our nation, exclusively (or even any at all), uneducated, uneducatable, unskilled, diseased, violent, hateful, uncivilized aliens who are not our people, who cannot and should not be attempted to be assimilated because God commanded us to be separate, and God commanded us not only to NOT intermarry with them, but not to fellowship with or live among them?  They bring their gods with them (even if they at first feign Christianity; and most who claim to be Christians hold to a corrupt, superstitious, polluted, pagan-hybrid of Catholicism, not Christianity).  God said “NO OTHER GODS!” and yet we allow them to build pagan temples in our land and our corrupt politicians even give their religion equal rights and special protection—illegally, unconstitutionally.  Aliens will only continue to commit crime, terrorism, and destabilization, and they will only be a perpetual drain on our finances and national resources at public expense, and they will mulitiply 10x faster than we the rightful population and breed us out of existence.  This has been the downfall of every great, formerly white Civilization / Empire (Egypt, Greece, Spain, Italy, Persia, India, etc.)—and every nation of Christendom is now under attack.
Allowing aliens and their gods in to Christendom violates the Law of God, the law of reason, and the U.S. Constitution.  Our second President, John Adams said that our Constitution, was “made only for a moral, Christian people” and our form of government, he said, is wholely unsuitable for any other people.  He meant that our Constitution was only meant for OUR people and the ONLY TRUE religion, Christianity.  Our Founders studied 2,000 years of history.  They established this nation for them and their posterity; for Christianity.  They knew that multicultural and interfaith states were an impossibility.  They knew other people were not the same; they knew other religions were false.  Our Founders and the Puritans / Pilgrims were brilliant, moral, godly men—and that is why all the modern “experts” denigrate them and that is why the public high schools don’t even teach U.S. history before the Civil War; and if they do make brief mention, it is only to insult and defame them.
For politicians to force integration, multiculturalism, “interfaithism”, and gender perversion upon us is High Treason.  They have no Constitutional Authority to change the Constitution.  It is the wholesale giving away of our entire nation to aliens—and if that is not stupid and immoral enough—to aliens who have shown over the past 2,000 years that they are incapable of developing civilization and that any civilization that they enter or that is turned over to them they destroy.
This is evident on a micro level as well as a macro level.  Which nations need continual hand-outs, welfare, programs, military and financial aid? —even after they demanded “liberation” and we left them on their own.  Which people living in the midst of civilized nations (the nations of Christendom) are perpetually on welfare and destroy anything given to them, and rob, assault, rape and kill...?  What do “projects” and “government housing” look like after only a few years?  What do our inner cities look like?—which were once safe, clean, and prosperous!  
Our Forefathers founded this nation for themselves and their posterity—for our people.  God commands separation.  Christ commanded, “give not that which is holy to the dogs and cast not pearls before swine, let they turn and trample and rend you!”  Surprise, Surprise, Surprise... that’s what happens every single time.  It happens when we violate God’s Law and go to them to try to “evangelize” them in violation of Christ’s Command.  It happens when we let them come to us in violation of God’s Command.  God commanded separation.  Christ commanded the same thing.  Christ did not abolish the Law of God.  Those who parrot the nonsense that Christ did away with the Law don’t know God and preach and follow a false christ.*  It is an abomination to give that which is holy to savages, to animals (they even call themselves “dog”...!).  Christ was not giving a lesson in animal husbandry.  Those who violate what He commanded participate in the genocide of God’s children and the rape and pollution of Christ’s bride...!!!  Yet in their utter spiritual blindness, these profoundly blind and spiritually dead “Christians” think that embracing such abominations is the “highest expression of Christian love”.  “If any man preach another gospel let him be accursed!”   
[* “Be holy as I am Holy.”  First and foremost that is a command!  This is profound evidence (as if any is needed) that God did not abolish His Law.  Keeping God’s Law was never for salvation: It is the Moral Code by which He commanded His people to live—forever.  Man is born in sin, with a sin nature; he is guilty from the womb.  No amount of not sinning (keeping the Law) can “un-sin” sin-guiltiness or the sin nature.  The rituals of sacrifice, the offering of clean, innocent animal victims was to provide for a temporary blood atonement for those of God’s people who repented of their sins, had the blood sacrifices offered and believed that God forgave them.  Animal sacrifice is the only part of the Law of God that Christ’s Sacrifice of Himself (the Lamb of God) replaced.  It is the only part that needed to be replaced.  Hebrews 8:8 informs us that the problem was not with God’s Law (which is perfect), but with man—with God’s sinful people.  The animal sacrifices were the “Schoolmaster” to lead us to Christ.  The sacrifice of lambs pointed toward the Lamb of God.  How hard is that to see?  The Law itself was not the School master.  Christ did not abolish the Law, but showed us how to keep it and commanded us to keep it.  The schoolmaster was to bring us to salvation, which does not come by the Law, but by faith.  Faith does not originate in man, but is the gift of God via the Holy Spirit to the elect wherewith they believe unto salvation.  Not eating a pig sandwich and not committing adultery did not save you from Hell.  It saved you from parasites and destroying society—and sinning against God.  The only remedy for sin was blood sacrifices.  The less a person sinned, the fewer sacrifices that were needed—and that was the goal, to live righteously; but living righteously did not save.  The Law of God was not abolished.  The CURSE of the Law—the Judgment for breaking the Law of God, the Death Penalty that was against us was “abolished”, in that it was “torn up” because Christ paid the debt / bounty on us with His Very Life.
Christ Himself told us that as long as heaven and earth existed not a single jot or tittle (not the smallest letter, not the slightest flourish at the top of a letter—that is, the little hook at of certain seriff-script letters as appears subtly at the top left of the letters, “b, d, h, k, p,” etc.) would pass away from the Law.  If not even the smallest letter or the slightest pen stroke would pass from the Law, what does that say for an entire law itself?  Christ said If you love Me keep My Commandments”.  The natural inversive inference is, If you do not keep My Commandments you do not love Me.  Christ said, “If ye keep My Commandments ye shall abide in My Love even as I have kept My Father’s Commandments and abide in His Love”.  Again, the inference is clear of the inverse.  Christ did not have His own set of laws.  He came to do the Will of the Father.  Christ said that the words He spoke and commanded were not His own but those of the Father Who sent Him.  He came to do His Father’s Will.  He submitted to the Father and we are to walk as He walked.  
God declared upon giving His Law to His people, “This is the Way, walk ye in it; turn not to the left hand or the right”.  Paul tells us that those who are truly in Christ are His workmanship created “unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them” (Ephesians 2:10).  “Good works”, “obedience”, “bearing fruit” are synonyms for following the Law of God—the Moral Code—God’s “House Rules” that He commanded that His children follow.  If Christ and the Holy Spirit are in you, you will bear Their fruit: “Walk in the Spirit and ye shall not fulfill the lusts of the flesh” (the violation of all that God commanded).  If you do not bear Christ’s fruit He is not in you, you are not a part of Him, and you are reprobate (II Corinthians 13:5).  If you violate God’s Law and He does not chasten you, you are not His child, but a bastard (Hebrews 12:8).  God only spanks His own children.  John said that we know that we know God if we keep His Commandments and if a person says that he knows God and does not keep His Commandments—that person is a liar (that is—he does not even know God) and the Truth (Christ / the Holy Spirit) is not in him (I John 2:4).  Paul said that the Law is holy, just, and good.  David said the Law of the Lord is perfect.  Paul asked, “Do we then make void the Law of God through faith?” and then answered his own question with a resounding, “God forbid! yea, we establish the Law!” (Romans 3:31)  Faith without works is dead.  Works do not add to faith.  True faith produces the works God ordained.  If the faith does not produce the works that God ordained it is defective “faith” — and God will not give defective faith and faith does not originate in man, so in reality such is not faith, but pseudo-spiritual humanistic delusion! counterfeit faith.  
The confusion comes with falsely thinking that every single time the word “law” is used, that it refers to the same thing; even as with the word salvation / saved.  One can be saved from drowning, but that is entirely different from Eternal Life.  Many words in Scripture can be used of many different things, and context alone provides the correct interpretation.  For those confused thinking that Paul abolished God’s Law, see my book, Sacred Truth Expository Commentary on Romans.]
Read Hebrews 8:8ff. and Jeremiah 31:31ff.  The New Covenant is to be made solely with the same people as the Old Covenant (which are not the imposters in the land of Israel today).  Christ said if you are not with Me you are against Me; and if you gather not with Me (gathering the wheat, not the “tares”; gathering the sheep, not the “dogs”, “wolves”, or “swine”) you scatter (My people) abroad.  What is someone who works against you and works to undo your work called? —an enemy.  Christ said that when He returns He will command the holy angels, “bring those Mine enemies that would not that I reign over them and slay them before Me”.  Those who depart from the unchanging doctrine that God established—that Christ confirmed, are the enemies of God.  He who would be a friend of the world, following the world’s one-world, one-race, one-religion, one-gender agenda is the enemy of God.  Let that sink in.
If a “Christian” believes that God abolished His Law (even though Christ said that He did NOT abolish it and not one jot or tittle shall pass—and thus, they follow a false shepherd and a false christ), then he ignorantly imagines that he is not in sin, when, in fact, he is; and so how can he ever repent of sin?  All sin breaks fellowship with God; ignorant sin as well as “wilfull” sin.  Ignorant sin is sin nonetheless.  Ignorance itself, after some point in time, is sin in and of itself because God has commanded us to study His Word, to know His Will.
“47And that servant, which knew his lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.  48But he [that servant] that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes.  For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.” (Luke 12)  
—it is the unshirkable duty of servants to know their master’s will!  It is the unshirkable duty of children to know their father’s will.  Ignorance is not an excuse but a cop out!  Even in the Old Testament, if a person sinned out of ignorance, once he realized that he was in sin, he needed to repent and have sacrifices offered to cover the sin.  If “Christians” actually read God’s Word daily and meditated upon as it as commanded, the Truth would eventually sink in that their preachers and Bible teachers are either blind guides or have been lying to them and that God did not abolish His Law.*
[* If “Christians” actually understood God’s Very Nature they would realize that He could not have abolished His Law.  But as John said, they don’t even know God, though they think they do.  If they knew Him they would fear Him knowing that He is Holy, Just, and True and must punish sin as He declared.  The evidence that they don’t know God is because they reject the Revealed self-declaration of God concerning His Nature and they instead invent their humanistic preferred image of God in their own minds—and that is a idolatry and worshipping a false god (we shall discuss this more later, in terms of “percentages” of reality.  The reason that they do not believe the truth is because God has not regenerated them.  God chooses.  No man cometh unto Christ except the Father draw him.  “The wind bloweth where it listeth [determines]... so is everyone that is born of the Spirit”.  When Peter declared Jesus to be the Christ, Christ replied, “Flesh and blood hath not revealed this unto you, but My Father which is in Heaven”.  People don’t choose to be born or resurrected.  Sheep don’t choose their shepherd.]
Instead of obeying all that God commanded, Christians are engaged in a plethora of abominations that God forever forbade—and THAT is why Christendom is being DESTROYED and why God does not hear our prayers.  They don’t even comprehend the very essence of morality.  Morality never changes.  Morality is established in everything that God declared, “This shalt thou do!” and “Thou shalt not!”  Sin never becomes nonsin.  Abominations never become wholesome.  Evil never becomes good.  Our violation of this simple truth is responsible for all of our woes and is responsible for the destruction of Christendom.
“The curse causless shall not come...” (Proverbs 26:2)
“But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid His Face from you, that He will not hear.” (Isaiah 59:2)
“If I regard iniquity in my heart, the Lord will not hear me.” (Psalm 66:18)
“He that turneth away his ear from hearing the Law, even his prayer shall be abomination.” (Proverbs 28:9)
The carnal mind is irrational.  It thinks that the wisdom of God is foolishness.  It thinks that what it imagines to be “reasonable” and “fair” must be reality, and that God is wrong.  God is Boss.  God is Immutable (He does not change), Perfect, Holy, True, Omniscient.  What is it about those Attributes that “Christians” do not understand?  The carnal mind that characterizes the average “Christian” eagerly jumps at any pretense to throw off what God has commanded in favor of a vague, nebulous substitute of man’s own choosing.  How odd that those who claim to love God so easily listen to any other voice saying the opposite of what God commanded.  Why is that? —because they don’t know God's Voice.  Why is that? —because they don’t know God.  Christ said, “My sheep know My Voice and follow [obey] Me.... the voice of a stranger they will not follow”.  What then is the valid implication if “Christians” follow a voice other than Christ’s doing the very opposite that He commanded...? —they are not His sheep.*  And that is why on the Day of Judgment, the goats (lawless sheep)  shall whimper to Christ, “but did we not do all these ‘wonderful works’ in Thy Name” and Christ shall reply, “Depart from Me ye that work iniquity [lawlessness] I never knew you!”  If that does not sober up the majority of “Christians” then that is simply more evidence that they are not Christ’s sheep.
[* or hopefully, they are not Christ’s sheep “yet”.  Hopefully, they have not been regenerated yet, but God will by His Grace call them out of darkness into His Marvellous light and give them knowledge and repentance unto salvation; not believing an irresponsible “feel good” humanism, “Touched By An Angel” Theology that says, “No need to change a thing; God loves you just the way you are”.  Christ said when He forgave, “Go and sin no more”.  Without turning from sin and turning to obediece (along with confession and asking forgiveness through the Blood of Christ) there is no repentance and thus there is no salvation and there was no regeneration.  Every tree is known by its fruit.  A tree does not become an apple tree by bearing apples; it bears apples because that is what its Maker ordained it to bear.  A father’s progeny do not “become” their father’s children by obeying his commands.  They are his children by the father’s will and act in procreation.  Children establish themselves as honorable sons by obedience.
Is it any wonder that Christendom is being destroyed?  Is it any wonder that God does not hear our prayers?  
“But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid His Face from you, that He will not hear.” (Isaiah 59:2)
None of God’s Laws were “ceremonial”.  The blood sacrifices were not mere ceremony.  The blood sacrifices were all that was abolished.  God said that if we ate animals that He forbade, we defile ourselves and make ourselves abominable.  God said we make ourselves abominable and defile ourselves if we violate the sexual, gender, racial, marital laws—none of which were abolished.  And God declares in the New Testament:
“If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.” (I Corinthians 3:17)
Christ did not “change” the Sabbath to Sunday.  What part of “not one jot or tittle” don’t you understand?  God declared the Sabbath, the Seventh Day to be Holy and hallowed it and commanded us to observe it throughout all our generations forever.  No verse in the New Testament says that it was changed because it was not.
See my book, Ten Commandments for Youth.
No does not mean “yes”.  Forever does not mean “it will change”.  “Thou shalt not” does not mean, “live however you like” or “follow any new ideas your church or guru conjures up instead of what I commanded”.  
“Be ye mindful always of His Covenant; the Word which He commanded to a thousand generations.” (I Chronicles 16:15)
“A thousand generations” is an idiom for “forever”.  Regardless, it has only been about 178 generations from Adam!  Do the math.
But hopefully, many of those who think they are sheep but are following a false shepherd, God will draw unto Christ that they may be truly converted and regenerated to life to live as God commanded.  Living as God commanded does not save—it is a by-product, an evidence of salvation.  Hopefully those who are reading who fit into this category (as I myself once did) will not be as the natural (carnal, unconverted, unregenerate) man who beholds his face in a looking-glass (mirror) and then goes away and indifferently forgets what he saw and continues on in his unchanged life.  Hopefully they will be convicted and concerned and actually begin to seek the real God—the self-declared God of Revealed Scripture, not the humanistic god that they have invented in their own minds, as the result of corrupt denominations that represent the Apostate Church.  If such are not convicted that is simply more evidence that they are not His, and that His Holy Spirit has not quickened them to life; and that God’s Holy Spirit has not drawn them to Christ.  They therefore, are like Christ’s parable of the curious “party crashers” who were not actually invited to the wedding feast (which is a valid inference).  When the King met them and was shocked and offended that they were not wearing a wedding garment (being clothed in the Righteousness of Christ), but in crude attire, the King asked them “Why not?” —and they were clueless!  Why were they clueless? —clearly because they had not been invited, did not have an invitation.  Such an invitation would explain such a requirement.  They clearly, therefore, had simply seen people going someplace talking about a free party and followed along.  Look up that parable yourself to see what their fate was.]
And for that reason the majority of “Christians” have eagerly danced to the Antichrist’s tune that “God abolished His Law” and that “all you need is love” (which I think is pretty close to a godless Beetles’s song, not Christian doctrine).  Christ commanded us to love God and to love our kinsman as ourselves.  Ethereal “love” does not “replace” the Law of God—obeying God’s Law is the only way to demonstrate love to God and our kinsmen.  When you love your kinsman-neighbor* as yourself, you will not rape his daughter, commit adultery with his wife, rob him, murder his son, etc.—or let anyone else do it (including allowing an illegal, unconstitutional, unbiblical immigration policy and Law Enforcement and Judiciary policy that “looks the other way” when aliens commit crimes, which unlawful policies were instituted by treasonous antichrist politicians).
[* —which is the only kind of neighbor we are to have and the only kind of neighbor of which Christ speaks.]
True love is the motivational force of keeping the Law.  Love is the first-mentioned element of the “Fruit of the Spirit”: which Fruit-package does not originate in man and which love is not the world’s perverted notion of love.  Love is self-sacrifice and / or obedience.  God so loved (the elect of His own in) the world that He gave His only begotten Son.  If ye love Me keep My Commandments.  Love is not a “feeling”: Love is the internal nature that embraces and fulfills moral obligation.  It may be accompanied by “warm fuzzy emotions”, but it is not “warm fuzzy emotions”.  Love is a partner to Faith (which also does not originate in man, but is contained and dispensed in the Fruit of the Spirit).  Faith is based upon the facts—the Doctrine—of the Word of God.  True faith produces, is demonstrated by works; even as true love is demonstrated by and produces obedience.  Anything less is sterile and counterfeit, “false fruit”.  “Examine yourselves whether ye be in the faith”* ... otherwise, ye are reprobates.”
[* —not whether you be in “delusion” or rebellious notions concocted by sinful men (Christians included).   True Faith produces what God ordained for it to produce: obedience.
“13Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep His Commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.  14For God shall bring every work into Judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.” (Ecclesiastes 12)
The only true Faith is that which is imparted by the Holy Spirit to those who are regenerated, which then is the dynamic force that enables them to understand the unchanging Doctrine in the Word of God (not based upon man’s humanistic substitute for what God declared)—and the ability to obey.  “Walk in the Spirit and ye shall not fulfill the lusts the flesh.”]
If you love God you will not worship other gods, graven images, disrespect His Name, violate the Sabbath, or sin in your mind, your person, or wrong any of your kinsmen-neighbors.  Likewise, faith does not replace works, because faith without works is dead.  It is not faith + works.  It is that true faith will naturally produce the works that God commanded by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.  If the batteries in your device don’t produce any works—the batteries are dead!  No batteries (faith) or dead ones; no works.  The works don’t produce or add to the batteries.  The batteries produce the works or the batteries have no purpose.  Likewise love does not replace obedience to the Law, true love will naturally result in obedience, which is demonstrated by proper living as God commanded, without offense to God or man.
An animal does not “become” a dog by barking and chasing cats.  A dog barks and chases cats because it is a dog and because that is in its nature to do “naturally”—produce dog works.  It is in the nature of sinners to sin.  The new nature of a true child of God who has true Faith is to produce the works God ordained—it is within that dynamo of Faith to naturally produce good works (obedience to the Law of God) that God commanded.  
“For I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ: for it is the Power [dunamis] of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Judean [in the land of Israel] first, and also to the Greek [Israelite of the diaspora].” (Romans 1:16)
[The Greek word dunamis is whence we derive our words dynamo, dynomite, dynamic, etc.]
The Gospel is the Doctrine of Salvation of the elect of God’s people, which can only be understood and believed and embraced by those to whom the Holy Spirit has imparted faith whereby they believe unto salvation, after regenerating them.  Every tree is known by its fruit.  That is the relationship of true faith and good works / true love and keeping the Law.  It is an issue of bearing the fruit that a truly converted nature will naturally bear—unless the tree is diseased and sickly and dying; unless it greedily uses all the blessings in the soil to produce luxurous leaves and bark, rather than fruit (in which case, it may be hewn down and cast into the fire).  Keeping the Law does not save.  It never did.  Doing good works doesn’t save.  It never did.  God saves us unto good works / obedience to His unchanging, perfect Law.  Morality never changes.  The entire Law of God is a moral issue.  What part of “This shalt thou do” and “Thou shalt not” don’t you understand?  That is how God established morality: what God decreed.  Most people confuse immorality with only sexual offenses; but though that is one of the most blatant and most common, it does not change the reality that any and all violation of God’s Law is immoral.
Understand: God’s most-important attribute is His Immutability.  What good would His Holiness, Goodness, Love, Perfection, etc. be if they were subject to change?  God declared, “I am Yahweh and I change not, therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed”.  God declared, “Be holy as I am Holy”.  If that Standard of Holiness for us has “changed” (—even though Christ said that it didn’t), it is impossible for us to be holy as God is Holy for He never changes.  
[For more detailed information on these topics, see my books: Does God Repent? — Can God Change His Mind? and What’s Keeping God From Delivering America, Britain, and Europe From Destruction? and Ten Commandments for Youth.]
Someone emailed me asked about the Scripture verse that speaks about preaching “to every creature”.
I replied:
The Hebrew and Greek words for “all” do not mean “every last one” but “all of the group being spoken of” or “all of the limited group earlier described elsewhere in Scripture”.  This is clearly evident in many passages (though it not as clear in all, the truth remains the same):
Caesar did not tax the whole world, but the whole ROMAN world; the “world” in his jurisdiction, under his rule.
Cyrus did not conquer all the nations of the world, but he conquered all the nations of the world against whom he went in battle.
The second half of Acts 2:39 clearly explains the first half:
“For the Promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.”
Many other passages explain the rest.  The Promises and Covenants (including salvation) were only given to the pure line from Adam and then to the legitimate descendents of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob (Romans 9:4,5; Hebrews 8:8ff.).  God said all are dead in sin, none seek Him, none do good, none are righteous; He shut the ears, eyes, hearts, minds of all and opens only those of the elect whom He in Christ determined before the foundation of the world.  No man, Christ said, cometh unto Me except the Father draw Him.  THAT and other passages defines the “whosoever” or “all” or “every”—all whom God said that He would draw.  
Even in one of the several carelessly tossed around “whosoever” passages, the answer is present:
“21And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the Name of the Lord shall be saved.  [BUT READ THE FIRST WORDS OF THE NEXT VERSE] 22Ye men of Israel, hear these words...” (Acts 2)
One also has to remember to whom the Bible was written; to whom the prophets were sent; to whom Christ was sent.  Gabriel said Jesus would save HIS people from their sin.  Christ said that He was not sent but unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel.  To add anything is an abomination and humanism and man’s invention of his own religion, sticking God and Christ in where man thinks they make good decorations.  It is not the servants place to judge whether or not he thinks that his master’s decisions are right or wrong or “fair”—but to obey or be cast out.  
“9Woe unto him that striveth with his Maker!  Let the potsherd [broken pottery] strive [instead] with the [other] potsherds of the earth.  Shall the clay say to him that fashioneth it, ‘What makest Thou?’ [or ‘What do You think that You are doing?’] or [shall] Thy work [say unto Thee], ‘He hath no hands?  [‘He is an inept, clumsy Potter”]  10Woe unto him that saith unto his father, ‘What begettest thou?’ or to the woman [the father’s wife], ‘What hast thou brought forth?’  11Thus saith the LORD, the Holy One of Israel, and his Maker, ‘Ask Me of things to come concerning My sons,* and concerning the work of My Hands command ye Me.  12I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even My Hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.” (Isaiah 45)
[* Scripture itself clearly tells us WHO God’s sons are; WHO His children are; WHO His daughters are; WHO His people are; WHO His elect are; WHO His servants are; and TO WHOM He is the “Holy One”.]
The use of the words “all” or “every” or even “whosoever” to mean “all of a limited group” may sound odd, but we use the same words in the same way.  
[“Guess how many pennies I have in my pocket and I will give you every last penny”—not every last penny in the world, but all those in my pocket.  Try to keep up with the story that I am telling, not the daydream in your mind.]
Have you never heard someone, depressed, (even if you yourself have never thought or said it),
“No one loves me” ... “everyone hates me”... “nobody cares”... “all I do is suffer”... etc.
While this is often an exaggeration, it is often sometimes not exaggeration, but perspective.  The intention is not “every last person on earth” (for hardly a measurable fraction of people on earth even know that you exist, so how could they hate or not love you or care or not care about you?); the intention is, “every person in my life whom I love, whom I care about, whom I consider a friend, every significant person in my life, my family, my job, my neighborhood, etc. hates me, has abandoned me, or does not care about me, etc”.  It does not refer to every last soul on earth, but those in the mind who constitute the specific, limited “all”.  Many, many verses like this exist in the Bible and they will jump out at you as you read the Bible once you know what to look for.
[Similarly, if a man and a wife are out shopping at a large department store for some important event, like for a dinner-party they will be hosting, to purchase supplies needed for camping or a road trip, etc., they, if pressed for time, may divide up the list, each taking half, and scamper around gathering the items.  Once each of them checked off everything on their respective lists and filled their respective carts, before (during, or after) going through checkout, one of them might excitedly ask the other, “Now, we got everything—right?”  Of course, this does not mean everything in the store or everything in the world.  Those who cannot keep up with a simple plot and dialogue really ought not to eavesdrop into other people’s lives or read other people’s mail (and project their ignorance into reality).
That’s how the word is used in Scripture also.  It is not an exaggeration; it is the specific, limited “all” in the mind of the speaker, or based upon a specific audience or based upon other known facts that the author of Scripture assumes the readers will know, since he already told them elsewhere—and if they don’t know, it behooves the readers not to jump to wild illogical, illegitimate speculative conclusions, but study to show themselves approved!
In Colossians, Paul writes,
“And [God], having made peace [satisfied His Own Holiness and demand of Judgment] through the Blood of His [Christ’s] Cross, by Him [Christ] to reconcile all things unto Himself [God]; by Him [Christ], I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in Heaven.” (1:20)
Note clearly: Often it is even difficult to sort out the meaning of the pronouns in any verse, as well as words like “all”, “every”, “stranger”, etc.  It must be done based upon other established Scipture (because God will not contradict Himself or change His Mind).  This “all things” is not referring to every last human and it is not referring to the angels.  Either of those notions violates other clear declarations of Scripture; and such false interpretations are what perverted minds use as impotent support for false doctrines such as “Ultimate Reconciliation” in which they believe no one will suffer forever in Hell and that every last human and angel and Satan himself will be reconciled back to God into one big happy family—because carnal men (imagining themselves to be “spiritual”) conclude that God must behave as man deems proper.  Despite God saying that His Thoughts and Ways are astronomically above our own and which are past finding out, humanists think that they are more moral than God and thus give God boundaries concerning what He can or cannot think, say, or do.  Such is blasphemous heresy and indicates that those who believe such don’t understand the Bible and don’t know God.  Stupid potsherds!
Similarly, in the same chapter of Colossians, Paul continues,
“If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the Gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister.” (1:23)
Here is significant evidence that every creature does not mean “every last individual creature”, nor even “every last individual person”.  Paul was here writing possibly around a.d. 56.  Not even in Paul’s wildest dreams of missionary adventures had he circumvented the entire globe, covering every possible geographic grid on earth, and preached either personally or through those whom he trained and sent out, to the extent that every single person in every single country and island on earth had heard the Gospel at this early date.  Scotsman Robert Young, in his Literal Translation (1862), offers a much-better rendering,
“if also ye remain in the faith, being founded and settled, and not moved away from the hope of the good news, which ye heard, which was preached in all the creation that is under the heaven, of which I became—I Paul—a ministrant.”
—not in every single location under Heaven; but in every single place that God had ordained in creation for it to be preached under heaven at that time.]
If at a family reunion at a public park, under a pavillion, I say to all those family members listening to my little family speech, “If anyone here needs help with the price of the gas it took you to get here today, see me afterward and I will give you some money”—that offer does not refer to everyone in the entire park, nor even any nonfamily member who may be eavesdropping, out of curiosity.  It refers only to my family members there at that time, who actually needed help financially.
So also is the Bible written.  It is a family record (we are told this in Genesis 5 and reminded throughout the whole of the Old and New Testaments).  Read the “whosoever will” in context.  It is God’s true Israel people (not the antichrist imposters in the land or the world today who “claim” to be God’s people) who are being discussed and / or spoken to.
Whenever Christ uses the word whosoever, He is speaking only to His people; and only those, as He often says, “who have ears to hear”—and the only ones of His people who have ears to ear are those whose ears the Holy Spirit has opened to enable them to hear.  He came only for His people.  The land of Israel was filled with a mixed multitude and for that reason Christ spoke only in parables to the general public: because the truth was meant only for the elect of His sheep.  The Holy Spirit would draw those ordained unto salvation to be intrigued and inquire deeper.  Those not called would hear an amusing story.  They didn’t have t.v. and movies and ball games and concerts with which to waste their lives, so when some new popular prophet came on the scene, many stopped by for a little entertainment, and stayed until they grew bored or were offended at what they heard.
In Genesis 6 we read,
“12And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.  13And God said unto Noah, ‘The end of all flesh is come before Me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth’.”
The Hebrew word kol (long o, as in coal) is the same as the Greek word pahss and it does not necessarily mean universally every last one.  It is a limited all in the context of what is being spoken.  It more often, even most often, means, “all manner of” or “all of the group being discussed”.  What is the proof of this in this passage itself...?  Noah had not corrupted himself.  Is not Noah a “someone”, “flesh” upon the earth...?  Noah’s wife had not corrupted herself.  Noah’s 3 sons and their 3 wives had not corrupted themselves.  That’s 8 people.  Were they not flesh?  If “all” means “every last one” then these 8 were corrupted also.  What about Noah’s father Lamech?  What about Lamech’s father Methuselah?  Methuselah died about a month before the Flood and Lamech died 5 years before the Flood.  Had they corrupted themselves?  Lamech lived to be 777.  That’s pretty special number in Scripture.  Clearly Lamech and Methuselah had not corrupted themselves genetically, or Noah himself would have been corrupted, and would not have been perfect in his generations / pure in his genealogies.  
More profound is this realization that “all” is not every last one, when one realizes that God gave Noah 120 years to prepare the ark.  Thus, that was 120 years before Methuselah died and 115 years before Lamech died.  Clearly these two Patriarchs had not corrupted themselves.
[However, “all flesh” does include every person living who found himself outside of the ark at the time that the Flood came.  A “local” flood is unsupportable except by extracting a few bits of words from the entire Bible and making it fit with pagan Chinese “history”.  See my, Who Was the Serpent...? and the Waters that Covered the Earth.]
All is not “every last one”.  All is “all of the group in mind” within in the context of the overall picture that is being presented.  When in the middle of a football game the coach yells “Everyone come over here, now”, everyone in the stands does not pour onto the field, the other team doesn’t rush over, the cameramen and reporters and security guards and food venders don’t flock like vultures; people watching t.v. don’t try to jump into their t.v. sets.  That coaches players come over.  All is the specific all; not the worldwide all.  People need to try to use all of their brains, not just a neuron or two.  Don’t be lazy.  Your brain won’t wear out.  On the contrary, like a muscle, when exercised, it will grow; maybe not in girth, but in density.  Furthermore, this is the Word of God—not Sports Illustrated.  Do it proper honor by properly thinking.
So it is with the whole Bible.  People are easily confused because they are anti-intellectual (“don’t bother me with the facts or logic; I believe the way I do because it feels right”, or “works for me” or “makes sense to me” [according to my carnal way of thinking]); and because they refuse to believe what God decreed.  The only explanation for why they so believe is because God has not called them to believe.  Therefore, they believe the fairy tale that they concoct in their own minds (or some “other gospel” fabricated by false prophets and either evil or blind shepherds: the blind leading the blind).  
The average “Christian” is only willing to “believe” as long as what he hears is what he wants to hear, what tickles his ears and fluffs his aura: “Cotton-candy theology” (but it rots the soul, not the teeth).  The average anti-intellectual “Christian” thinks that he can overrule God.  He thinks that his emotions and “personal experience” overpower the God of the universe.  Such are not truly converted; only trapped within their own pseudo-spiritual delusion (which God has sent them).  
This is why the majority of the so-called “Christian world” has departed from true theology and embraced humanism called Arminianism.  The majority of those who believe it have probably never even heard what it is called and don’t actually know the formal tennents of what they claim to believe because they don’t even know what they believe—what they believe is a feel-good humanism; not Bible doctrine.  They cut the words of the Bible that they like, such as “happy”, “blessed”, “love”, “joy”, “freedom”, etc. out of the Bible and paste it into a “happy collage” scrapbook along with “pretty pictures” and anything else that makes them “feel good” and affix it to the walls of their minds and that is their religion: but it is a false religion; even though it incorporates a smattering of Biblical words and sentiments.  
Arminianism (which is opposed to true Reformed, true Protestant Christian Doctrine) teaches the “basic goodness of man” and the “free will” of man; that man “charts his own course”; and that God has been issued a “hands-off policy” and “man himself chooses salvation” and “maintains his own salvation”; and that “Jesus died for everyone”; and that “God has no say in who His children are” and “Christ has no say in who His bride is”.  Such are all abominable heresies.
Read Hebrews 8:8ff.  WITH WHOM is the New Covenant made?  It hasn’t changed any from Jeremiah 31:31ff.
[ff. is the standard abbreviation for “and following verses”.]
Truth is based upon truth not opinion or fantasy.  Each verse of Scripture does not constitute “its own little Bible”.  Each verse builds upon previous, related truth and each verse is in harmony with the whole and does not contradict what was previously established.  Those who cannot follow the flow of thought need to go back and start on their own level: “See Moses.  See Moses run.” ... then progress to more-complicated thought and sentence structure.  Purge your mind of the mainstream politically correct “revised” apostate interpretation of the Scriptures and read what GOD actually says.
Understand God.  God cannot change.  He cannot change His Mind: Though His Plan has different stages, it is all the same plan for the same people; but the plan does not change.   God cannot lie or contradict Himself or make a mistake or fail.  Understand: If there seems to be a contradiction, it is a misreading and you are confused.  Some math problems take a little extra brain power to solve, but because they do not appear as simple as 1 + 1 = 2 does NOT mean that the problem itself is in error.  Yes, it is “easier to believe” that the answer to everything is 1 + 1 = 2.  But it is not reality and it not only will solve nothing, but confuse everything.  “Study to show thyself approved.”  God hid the truth from those unworthy of it.  Those who have His Spirit within them will be treasure hunters, not tourists on a picnic (nor vandals and thieves on a joy ride).
No Scripture is an island unto itself.  From the start, the Old Testament prophecies declared the coming Redeemer of God’s people.  All people are not God’s people.  He created all, but they are not His people; He is not their Father.  All races do not descend from Adam; only those whom the name “adam” defines.*  The angel Gabriel who announced Mary’s conception of and the coming birth of that Redeemer told her, “Thou shalt call His Name Jesus,** for He shall save His people from their sins”.  Christ specifically said “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel” and “as the Father hath sent Me, so send I you”.
[* See my booklet, The Creation of Man in Genesis 1 and 2.
** —more properly, “Yehoshua”.  Jesus is the Anglicization of Iesus, which is the Latinization of Iesous, which is the Hellinization (Greekification) of the Hebrew Yehoshua.  Yehoshua means, “Yahweh-saved” or “saved of Yahweh”.  Yahweh is the Covenant Name by which God’s people were to know and call upon Him.  If your name is Steve, would you want people calling you “Stew” or “Sieve” all the time?  The matter becomes more serious when one realizes that it is a legal name, as used in court.]
The First Great Commission was to Israel only locally (under Christ’s physical supervision with their “training wheels” on).  This is perfectly clear:
“5These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, ‘Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the House of Israel’.” (Matthew 10).
The Second Great Commission was to Israel only worldwide—throughout the entire world whither God had scattered His people.
Christ said, “as My Father hath sent Me, even so send I you”. (John 20:21)
How was Christ sent...?  “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 15:24)
[Understand, the Biblical Israelites are not those people who now populate the land of Israel and spuriously call themselves “Israelis”, “Jews” (a corruption of Judah), “Hebrews”, etc.—ANY MORE than those savages who have taken over our inner cities in Miami, Los Angeles, San Antonio, Dallas, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Helsinki, Dublin, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Oslo, Brussels, Marseilles, London, Berlin, Rotterdam, Amsterdam, etc. are Americans, British, Germans, Swedes, Danes, Norwegians, etc.  What has happened before our eyes in a few short years at warp speed (which has been happening slowly, to desensitize us for the past 70 years) happened in the land of Israel after true Israel was deported by Babylon and Assyria; which conquering kings also then imported corrupt alien peoples to occupy the land of Israel and keep it productive and keep the tribute money flowing.  When the tiny remnant of the House of Judah returned from captivity 70 years later, “Goldilocks” found someone else sleeping in her bed!  The true Judeans had to fight and wriggle their way back into their own homes, like people trying to get onto a New York subway train.  Those alien peoples were never evicted, and the true Judeans had to try to reclaim little bits of their own territory; but the majority were never evicted and their entire towns were never reclaimed.  The nothern 1/3 (Galilee) and the southern 1/3 (Judea) were reclaimed and re-populated maybe half-way, over the next several centuries; but the central 1/3 (Samaria) remained largely in the hands of aliens; and though some Israelites were raised in Samaria and known as “Samaritans”, the bulk of Samaritans were not God’s people and the stigma of being “Samaritan” was not a good one.  They could not be trusted.  Many Israelite-Samaritans began intermarrying with the mixed-Samarians.  Furthermore, like Lot in Sodom (or our people in any of our major cities that were originally white), those who are content to live among aliens will eventually be corrupted (or destroyed) by them; so the majority (but not all) of those Israelite-Samaritans living in Samaria were pagan.  They should have moved to live among kinsmen, but like many, after several generations, they did not want to leave their ancestral birthplace and family property.  Maybe like many white in South Africa who did not want to leave South Africa 25 years ago when they could have, but they would not have been able to live in other countries as wealthily, having (nonwhite) servants, maybe the mixed-Samaritans provided cheap labor and the Israelite-Samaritans lived more of a life of ease.
By Christ’s day, Israel was still comprised of a mixed-multitude (and if you take a look at any of the major cities in Christendom—now spreading to the suburbs and country), the situation never gets better on its own.  Cancer and other diseases spread if ignored.  Because the land was a mixed multitude Christ spoke only in parables in open public.  The truth was meant to be understood only by His sheep.
The majority of our people are drunk on the wine of Babylon (which means, “confusion by mixing”) and they are are committing NATIONAL SUICIDE and giving our heritage, our faith, our inheritance—that which is holy to the dogs and the swine—and we are seeing the unavoidable and certain results of destruction and death.
God commanded separation, “Come out from among them and be ye separate and touch not the unclean thing [people]* and I shall be a Father unto you and you [indeed] will be My sons and daughters”.  God periodically commanded His people to put away all alien blood that had crept into families in the nation—divorce such wives and send them and all children by them away forever.  God does not change.  Morality does not change.  Those who that think morality does change do not know God.  Those who violate what God commanded breed all of their descendents out of the Family of God.  Christ said that His sheep know His Voice and follow (obey) Him and the voice of a stranger they will not follow.  The majority of “Christians” are not Christ’s sheep because they are following a false shepherd that claims to be Jesus—and they don’t even know the difference; and they don’t know the difference between a sheep and a dog or a pig, so it is no surprise that they don't know the difference between Christ and Antichrist.
[* The word “thing” was supplied by the translators for clarity, but they terribly missed the mark; it is not “things” that are being discussed in the chapter—it is PEOPLE.]
Christ said that MANY on that day who will have thought themselves good “Christians” who will even declare, “but have we not done all these wonderful works in Thy Name?” will hear Christ declare, “Depart from Me ye that work iniquity [lawlessness; violation of what God commanded] I never knew you”.  Christ that said if you are not with Him you are against Him.  If you don’t gather what He is gathering and commanded to be gathered [sheep, wheat] then you scatter abroad [work against Him and seek to undo His Work].  What is such a person called? —an enemy.  Those who don’t know Christ’s Plan are not of Christ.  Those who reject Christ’s Plan are antichrist.  Christ will declare one day, “bring all those Mine enemies that would not that I reign over them and slay them before Me.”  If Christ is your LORD you SUBMIT to what HE commanded, rather than trying to be a friend of the world which makes you the enemy of God!  God’s agenda is not the world’s agenda.  The world hates God.  God does not love the whole world; He loves His elect in the world.
If you want to see what God HATES, but you are too lazy to read the Bible, all you have to do is look and see what the world loves, celebrates, promotes, and even protects by special legislation.  If you want to see what God LOVES but you are too lazy to read the Bible (and your mind is still in darkness and you could not understand it even if you did read it), all you have to do is look and see what the world hates, demonizes, attacks, and tries to outlaw.  What does the world hate more than anything else? —white Christians who have the audacity to preserve their faith, bloodlines, and heritage.  What does the world love? —everything that God called an abomination: race-mixing, homo-perversion, pedophilia, corruption, defilement, immorality, free sex without boundaries, eating of unclean animals, drunkenness, interfaith, multiculturalism, etc., etc., etc.
Christ is going to do a lot of slaying when He returns.  Mainstream Christians think Jesus is coming back with a smile on His Face.  The first time He came as a Lamb to save the elect of His people—the second time He is coming as a LION (and those who hate Him and who did the opposite of what God commanded will experience the Wrath of the Lamb) to avenge the abuse of His bride and crush and devour His enemies!  Are you helping rape the bride of Christ, or are you the bride of Christ who has kept herself pure from the world?  Christ will not accept an alien bride thrust upon Him.  God will not accept the spurious bastard children of someone else thrust into His nursery as His child and heir.  Those who think so don’t know God and don’t even understand the concept of Holiness.  The true God is a stranger to them; the true is foreign to them.  Their minds have been polluted by the world and they are not of God.]
Again, God does not change and God will not change His Plan and God said that He would do nothing concerning His people without first telling it through His servants the prophets (Amos 3:7).
God said that He would scatter Israel and regather Israel whom He scattered.  Scattered Israel, Israel in dispersion are the so-called “Gentiles”* to whom the Gospel was taken and the so-called "Gentiles" who came to confess Christ—Israel scattered among the nations; for whom God said He would send out fishers and hunters.  
[* The Hebrew word goyim and Greek word ethney are generic collective nouns that simply mean “peoples”, “nations”.]
God said that He would make a full end (not "bring into the family) all nations whither God had scattered Israel but He would not make a full end of Israel, but chasten her in love and woo back to Himself!
“Hear the Word of the LORD, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him [Israel]...” (Jeremiah 31:10)
“3...the LORD thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath scattered thee.  4If any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts of heaven, from thence will the LORD thy God gather thee, and from thence will He fetch thee.” (Deuteronomy 30)
“Therefore say, ‘Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will even gather you from the people, and assemble you out of the countries where ye have been scattered’.” (Ezekiel 11:17)
“3And I will bring you out from the people, and will gather you out of the countries wherein ye are scattered, with a Mighty Hand, and with a stretched out Arm, and with Fury poured out.... 41I will accept you with your sweet savour, when I bring you out from the people, and gather you out of the countries wherein ye have been scattered; and I will be sanctified in you before the heathen.” (Ezekiel 20)
“Thus saith the Lord GOD; When I shall have gathered the House of Israel from the people among whom they are scattered, and shall be sanctified in them in the sight of the heathen, then shall they dwell in their land that I have given to My servant Jacob.” (Ezekiel 28:25)
The wicked High Priest who suborned perjury and paid false witnesses to lie in court in the attempt to falsely convict Christ to have an excuse to have Him put to death, that corrupt evil priest, God commandeered his mouth, and unknowingly he prophecied the Divine Will when he said—
“50 ‘Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation people perish not.’  51And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation people; 52And not for that nation people [Israel in the land of Israel] only, but that also He should gather together in one the children of God [Israel in dispersion] that were scattered abroad.” (John 11)
God said that He would make a full end of all the nations whither He had scattered Israel but not make a full end of Israel—
“Fear thou not, O Jacob My servant, saith the LORD: for I am with thee; for I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee: but I will not make a full end of thee, but correct thee in measure; yet will I not leave thee wholly unpunished.” (Jeremiah 46:28)
Read the parable of the wheat and the tares; after that, in the same chapter, read the parable of the good and bad (putrid) fishes.
Preach the Gospel to “every creature” does not mean every soul on earth—neither does it mean grasshoppers, lizards and toads, owls and ants, wildebeest and musk ox.  Only someone devoid of God’s Holy Spirit could possibly imagine that “preach the Gospel to every creature” was intended to mean disobeying what Christ had commanded about not going to anyone but Israel, as He Himself had been sent, and His Command not to give that which is holy to dogs.
“Every creature” means all of those specific people—lost Israel—whom Christ had already told them to go and search out—those whom God scattered whom God said that He would regather.  Christ said to Peter and Andrew, who were fishermen, “Follow Me and I will make you fishers of men”.  God told us clearly who these “fish” were—
“15But, The LORD liveth, that brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither he had driven them: and I will bring them again into their land that I gave unto their fathers.  16Behold, I will send for many fishers, saith the LORD, and they shall fish them; and after will I send for many hunters [trackers], and they shall hunt them from every mountain, and from every hill, and out of the holes of the rocks.  17For Mine Eyes are upon all their ways: they are not hid from My Face, neither is their iniquity hid from Mine Eyes.” (Jeremiah 16)
Christ also told us in the parable of the good and bad fishes, that not all that were caught in the net (even as not all who crashed the wedding party) were kept, but the bad (putrid) were to share the same fate as the wedding party crashers (Matthew 22:13) — “but cast the bad away” and
“49So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth." (Matthew 13).
Christ also made it clear that there were people to whom they were not to go—the dogs and swine.
Go only to the lost sheep.
In order to undertand to whom the Gospel is preached, one must understand what the Gospel is.
[* This is the only Gospel—and it’s not a modern notion: “Good News for God’s people”.  God chose one people and one people alone and preserved a pure line from those people. All creation fell when Adam sinned but God promised to redeem His people, the pure descendents of Adam-Israel. God’s people sinned and God cast them off, for a time, in Judgment, but promised to regather them and redeem them.  Christ came for the elect of His people whom God determined** in Christ before the Foundation of the world.
** Most translations render it “chose”, but that is only a good translation if one realizes that God does not choose as man chooses: Eenie, meenie, minie, moe, flip a quarter, or even with the notion, “Oh there are so many wonderful selections how will I ever choose...?”  God does not think, He IS Perfect Thought.  He does not “react”.  He is Immutable and Omnipotent.  He determined who would be His people before the foundation of the world, and then created Adam from whom a select line of that people would be preserved: both in their generations as well as in their spirits that were ordained unto salvation; into whom God would again breathe life.  Not every Adamite or Israelite was ordained unto salvation.  We can’t know why, but He does all things after the Counsel of His Own Will and for His Own Good Pleasure.  “Good” is not defined by what man thinks is good.  Good is defined by what God does because He cannot be otherwise (whether His broken pottery agrees or not).
At some point in the life of each person of the elect (those predestined unto life) of God’s true people, the Holy Spirit blows upon him, regenerating him unto life, at which moment he recognizes his sinfulness, his need to be saved and converted; he then humbles himself, confesses his sin, and asks for forgiveness through the application of Christ’s Blood shed on his behalf, and accepts his reinstatement in a position of honor in the Covenant.  The Holy Spirit then guides and leads that person (according to the measure of Grace and Honor determined by God) into the truth and empowers that person to obey all that God commanded and gives him the desire to obey.  As an honorable son he then walks in the Spirit which results in obedience to all that God commanded; and as he daily meditates upon the Word of God and seeks God, each day he becomes more like Christ as the result of Divine Grace.  
God soon will have Christ return and judge the wicked who have so abused His people for the past 6,000 years and they shall share in the same fate with Satan and his angels; while we shall ever be with the Lord.  
THAT is the Gospel. Anything less or anything that violates that continuity, changes it, “breaks down all barriers” or “abolishes the Law” that God established or makes God “passive” and teaches that man is the one who determines his own destiny—any and all such unbiblical notions are antichrist, humanistic counterfeit and “another gospel”.  
The Gospel is not changed, history is not changed, reality is not changed, God’s Plan is not changed because alien or perverse people demand to be not only allowed in, but given equal rights—in fact, to be given special rights greater than the rightful heirs.  All that is a perversion of the Gospel and those who believe it follow the voice of a stranger and antichrist.
“...the Kingdom of Heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.” (Matthew 11:12)
“Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber." (John 10:1)
[What is there in a sheepfold to steal other than grass...? —the only thing they come to steal is sheep!  God’s sheep!  Understand, if a thief does not want his theft to be noticed right away, like a jewel or painting thief—he replaces the original that he stole with a counterfeit!  Ruminate on that, like all God’s sheep should.  Do you remember also, Christ’s warnings about “wolves in sheep’s clothing”...?  Do you think that Christ was delusionally paranoid and gave us such warnings simply because He was unstable?  Do you think that Christ gave us specific commands, reinforcing the Law of God, because He was a narrow-minded bigot Who was “backward” and not “progressive” and had failed to “evolve” and keep up with the “spirit of the times”...?  That’s what the world thinks about you if you hold to sound doctrine.  But you should be more concerned about what GOD thinks of you.  If you don’t hold to sound doctrine, if you compromise, water down, and pollute, why, then you fit in with the world just fine... and will eventually be bred out of existence because you are not of God.  He who would be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.  If you are of God wake up and get out of the pig stye and stop helping dogs and swine infiltrate the flock of God...!]
Christ is the Door to the sheep and He admits only His sheep.
“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel.”
“Call His Name Jesus [Yehoshua], for He shall save His people from their sins.”
Christendom has been turned into Babylon (“confusion by mixing”) by absorbing all those who are not God’s people, which is what this prophecy refers to (in conjunction with the above verse in Matthew 11):
“2And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, ‘Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils [demons], and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.  3For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her’.” (Revelation 18)
Fornication / whoredom crosses all racial (and gender) boundaries; whores and whoremongers are among the first to do it.
[As we shall see shortly, Christ despises this polluted, immoral confusion—this end-time Babylon and Christ will soon strike the feet and grind them to powder; and when the feet are crushed, what will happen...? stay tuned and read on...]
Each invididual verse in the Bible must be understood within the whole because God does not contradict Himself.  Maybe that is one reason why God did not have the original writing of the Bible to contain chapter or verse divisions.  That may seem unthinkable to us; but while those modern-inventions superimposed on the Scriptures of chapter and verse divisions make it very easy for us to find a particular passage, the flip side is that it causes the less-astute reader to draw artificial boundaries and not think of the book as a unified whole...!
Apply the very same rules of logic (noncontradiction) and interpretation (harmony, noncontradiction) also apply to any similar verse.  Use Scripture to interpret Scripture: Scripture cannot contradict itself; the initial declaration sets the Standard by which all that follows it is to be interpreted.  God is not double-minded.  He cannot lie, fail, make a mistake, forget, or violate His Word.  God is not the one who is confused.
The Apostle Paul wrote:
“19But I trust in the Lord Jesus to send Timotheus shortly unto you, that I also may be of good comfort, when I know your state.  20For I have no man likeminded, who will naturally care for your state.  21For all seek their own, not the things which are Christ Jesus’s.  22But ye know the proof of him [Timothy], that, as a son with the father, he hath served with me in the Gospel.  23Him therefore I hope to send presently, so soon as I shall see how it will go with me.  24But I trust in the Lord that I also myself shall come shortly.  25Yet I supposed it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus, my brother, and companion in labour, and fellowsoldier, but your messenger, and he that ministered to my wants.” (Philippians 2)
Here, Paul says “all” seek their own.  I have “no” man likeminded.  In other epistles he expresses similar sentiments that all had forsaken him.
Clearly, this does not mean every last person on earth.  Clearly, this does not even mean every last person who was a co-laborer with him.  We know that Timothy had not abandoned him—for Paul mentions Timothy and his co-laboration par excellence.  Paul then mentions Epaphroditus (called “Epaphras” in other epistles) and his exceptional self-sacrificing faithfulness.  So the “all” does not mean “every last person in the world” and neither did it mean “all that ever were laboring in coöperation with Paul”  (certainly Luke had not abandoned Him and did not only seek his own; and certainly Silas and Barnabas did not only seek their own, though maybe at that moment they were not working with Paul in the exact same location on the exact same assignment).  What Paul’s meaning of the word “all” is, is all who were working with me, who are not now working with me, who have forsaken me because they only care about themselves and they care not not the Work of God in seeking out the lost sheep whither God had scattered them throughout the world.
Similarly, in I Timothy 4 we read:
“3Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.  4For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: 5For it is sanctified by the Word of God and prayer.”
As I show in my, So, You Call Yourself A Christian... (which deals with Peter’s Vision and most other New Testament passages that those who are unlearned and unstable wrest / wrangle to claim that God abolished the dietary laws) this passage in I Timothy is not talking about unclean animals / meats.  It is referring to clean animals / meat that had been sacrificed in the market place to false gods and then sold (since the false gods do not exist, the false gods had no use for the animal’s carcass).  People who purchased these meats then took them home to cook and eat, or some of the meats were cooked and sold right there in the local bistro for those who wanted lunch.  Paul teaches elsewhere that since false gods do not exist (though it would be a sin to worship anything but God, since nothing else is God, especially not graven images, or the imaginations of man concerning creatures and creation and planets and stars, the sun, the moon, or demons who deceive men into worshipping them through those other objects), then it is no sin to buy meat that someone else in ignorance or wickedness had sacrificed to a false god / idol, then sold in the marketplace.  However, some Christians (especially new ones who had come out of such paganism) have weak consciences, as Paul points out in other passages, and if eating such clean meats that had been sacrificed to false gods would cause a weaker brother to stumble, then don’t do it for his conscience sake, if there is an alternative; but if you do so it is not sin.  While we ought to be considerate and thoughtful within reason God does not expect us to tip-toe gingerly, cautiously, neurotically through life as if walking on eggshells because of the irrational neuroses of those who are immature and never grow up.
What Paul is saying in I Timothy 4 is
“3...God hath created [those animals that He declared clean] to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.  4For every creature of God [which God declared to be clean] is good, and nothing [that God declared to be clean needs] to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: 5For [even if it had been sacrificed to a false god] it is sanctified by the Word of God and prayer [by the believer who asks God to santify the clean—though idolatrously dedicated—meat for his use]."
Scripture is built upon Scripture, as all logic is built upon valid and true propositions.  However, in normal speech, even as in the books of the Bible, it would be very tedious, verbose, and time-consuming (for both the author and the reader) to state in full the intention of every thought and implication.  God expects us to “keep up” and “put on our little spiritual thinking caps”.  One must do this even reading secular history or any novel.  Even if an earlier character appears much later under a different name, since he bears all the same characteristics as the former person the astute reader realizes that those two differently named persons are one and the same (such as is done in some of Alexander Duma’s novels).  Christians, for some reason, have lost this ability of critical thinking and common sense only when it comes to reading the Bible.  This is evidence that it is a profound spiritual problem, not an inherent intellectual problem.
God does not lie.  He does not change His Mind.  Morality does not change.  So when a Biblical author talks about all meats being good to eat—He is only talking about the clean meats that God said were permissible, because that which is unclean is an abomination that defiles us and that is never an option—so why would anyone ever even think of that?  Do they not trust the words of Christ Jesus Himself, who said, “not one jot or tittle shall pass from the Law”...? and if not, how can they claim Him as their “Lord”...? —since they neither believe or obey Him.  God did not create all creatures to be eaten by man.  Some were intended to be nature’s garbage disposals—yet “Christians” whose minds have been polluted with false doctrine, think that it is just “wonderful” to consume abominations, imagining them to be lovely delicasies.  They think so because God is not in their thoughts and their god is their belly!  Take the challenge.  Order, So, You Call Yourself a Christian..., 76pp., 5.50 + P&H.  As the old saying goes, “The way to a man’s heart is through his stomach”—but that only applies to a godless man who is spiritually dead and like the natural man beholding himself in a mirror, who goes right back out into sin, forgetful of the Word of God, unconcerned; to then do that which pleases the god of his belly, without giving a second thought that he is sinning against God defiling his body and making abominable the temple of the Lord.  Why does he forget that “ye are not your own” and that “ye are bought with a price: therefore, glorify God in your body and in your spirit which are God’s”...?  Man thinks this way because his mind is polluted by the world and because he is humanistic.  He thinks that because it does not make sense to him, then it does not matter and it is just some “strange” practice that God never intended for us today.  If God never intended it for you then you are not His child—because God said that His Law is a perpetual sign of the Covenant that we are His people and that we are different from all the heathen of the world.
Similarly, in v.3 of I Timothy 4, Paul says that some people “forbid to marry” and the intention is that such forbidding is unbiblical.  Now, clearly even as some people forbade others to eat meat because of some notion of “vegetarianism”, or if the clean meat “had been offered to idols”, so also some would-be “Christian” Bible teachers with their own false doctrine forbade Christians to marry, but commanded them to live as celibates (such false doctrines persist into the modern era!).  However, since no real Christian would ever imagine that this “forbidding to marry” referred to all possible types of perverse “marriages” — unholy unions that God had forbade,* why on earth does any “Christian” imagine that Paul is telling Timothy that it is okay to eat what God forever forbade...?  
[* —marriages outside the race, marriages of the same gender, marriages too close in blood relation, marriage to a woman put away by her husband, remarrying a woman you previously divorced if she had been married to another, marriages to nonbelievers, marriages to ones horse or dog or whatever perversion their damaged minds lust after, or marriages in violation of other commands that God established.]
But Paul is saying no such thing!  God commanded that we keep the dietary laws throughout all our generations forever.  He said that by eating unclean animals we defile ourselves and make ourselves abominable—the very same words used concerning homoperversion and inter-racial marriage.  Abominations never become wholesome.  Immorality never becomes moral.  Evil never becomes good.  If you think otherwise your mind is polluted by the god of this world and the true God is a stranger to you and you follow a false christ!  What do “Christians” not understand about this?  God said in I Corinthians 3:17 that the body of a child of God is the Temple of God and whoever defiles that temple God will destroy.  God said perverse forms of intercourse (including marrying outside the race), homoperversion, and eating unclean animals defile us and make us abominable.
Similarly, Paul wrote,
“6:12All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. .... 10:23All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.” (I Corinthians)
The longer form [concerning “all things”, though cutting out other parts of the passage that are unessential to “all things”] of what Paul is saying is this:
“6:12All things [that are lawful] are lawful unto me, but all things [that are lawful] are not expedient [necessary].... 10:23 All things [that are lawful] are lawful for me... but all things [that are lawful] edify not.”
What is so hard about this to understand?  It is a common practice to leave many words out that are cumbersome filler; we leave out many words, like “that” and “which” in informal speach; those who do not truly understand the English language (most raised in public schools) do not know how, or they are undisciplined and don’t care enough to “click up a few notches” to a higher level of speech in formal situations.  So it is in philosophy.  The majority of propositions, either in formal logic, or in daily conversation, are extremely abbreviated forms of what is really said.  Because the majority don’t know logic, they don’t know what they are really saying and that is why quite often they are wrong and cannot recognize valid, logical thought (imagining that they are “logical”, but their fuzzy notion of logic must mean that “I think I am right regardless of the facts”).
Does any true Christian really think that Paul above is saying that he can rape, rob, murder, steal, violate the Sabbath, eat abominable meats, commit adultery and homoperversion, and worship false gods...?  Though some confused Christians will hesitate / stumble at the examples of the Sabbath and the dietary laws, the answer is OF COURSE NOT to all of the above.
The issue that Paul is talking about is his being allowed to do that which is perfectly moral, good, and holy—but not doing it if it may cause a weaker kinsman-brother to stumble (or at least not to do it in his presence).  This is not in any area that God forbade, and not in any area that God commanded must be done (such as keeping the Sabbath, such as keeping the dietary laws, such as keeping the laws for marriage, etc.—those are non-negociable).
Here is a perfect example.  If you are in good health, good physical shape, not overweight, don’t have diabetes, etc., there is nothing wrong with you having a hot fudge brownie peanut butter banana split sundae every now and then.  But it would be wrong for you to eat it in front of one of your kinsmen who is obese, who does have diabetes, who has no will power...!  THAT is what Paul is talking about; and it is shameful that “Christians” automatically think the exact opposite of what God is saying, when they are confused (or have divided loyalties between God and “self”; and “self” usually rules in favor of “self”).  Why is their first instinct to doubt and disobey what their Father said when some other person tells them it is okay? —either because they are dishonorable children or not God’s children at all!  Have they never played, “Simon Sez” before...?  Do they get that easily confused when they read novels, a history book, or watch a movie?  If they don’t, it is the manifestation of a spiritual problem, not an intellectual problem.  Do they take orders from their boss or the cleaning lady in the office building?
Imagine that a carpenter hires a helper.  He drives a flatbed truck loaded with thousands of 2x4s to the job site.  The carpent then explains, “Okay, we are going to take 2 dozen 2x4s off the truck, and those are all that we are going to be using at this time.  The rest will be used by the other workers who will be arriving shortly.  The carpenter says, “Okay, now take 24 2x4s off the truck”.  No problem.  The helper does it competently.  If then a little while later the carpenter tells the helper, “Now bring all those 2x4s to the back of the house” and then sees the helper unloading the other thousands of 2x4s off the truck, it is at that moment that he realizes that he hired an idiot.  Note also: The manifestation of an idiot is not merely in misunderstanding.  The manifestation of an idiot is not asking for clarification if he is confused.  The manifestation of an idiot is one who already forgot all the instructions that were presented to him and lives only in the “ignorant thoughtless moment”.
Christ Jesus Himself says,
“the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give His Life a ransom for many.” (Matthew 20:28; Mark 10:45)
[#4183 - the Greek word for “many”, used here is polus / pollos (short o’s as in hop), which means, “much, many”— but it does not and it cannot mean “all”.]
Paul writes:
“Who gave Himself a ransom for all.” (I Timothy 2:6)
[#3956 - the Greek word for “all”, used here is pas, which can mean “all (inclusive or exclusive), as many as, etc”.]
Did not Paul preach the same Christ as Matthew and Mark?  Of course he did.  Paul had no authority to “change” anything.  Thus, when Paul uses “all”—he is referring to the same “many” of which the Gospelers spoke: and that “many” is the lost sheep of the House of Israel to whom Christ came and whom God said that He would not only regather, but redeem and save.
When “all” is used, it does not refer to “every last one” (except if the context clearly means a universal, all-encompassing all), but is to be understood in harmony with the previous declarations that Christ made—and in harmony with the Old Testament prophecies which Christ came to fulfill and which shall not pass away.  Can the majority of “Christians” not even remember what Prophecy is for? —and Christ said that “not one jot or tittle of the Law or the Prophets” would pass.  Why...? —because they are inseperable; they are not in conflict—and the Word of God abideth forever!  God’s Law sets the Standard.  The Prophets don’t violate it—they remind us of God’s Plan for His people.
All, every, or whosoever do not refer to “every last creature on earth”, but the “all for whom He came”; the “all whom He did in fact ransom”.  Understand the words ransom and redeem.  One can only “ransom” the one who is held prisoner (most often a close countryman, relative).  One can only “redeem” that specific something that has been sold—and for which he holds the ticket / note of Redemption.  Christ came to redeem His own.
“You only have I known of all the families of the earth...” (Amos 3:2)
“7The LORD did not set His Love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: 8But because the LORD loved you, and because He would keep the Oath which He had sworn unto your fathers, hath the LORD brought you out with a Mighty Hand, and redeemed you...” (Deuteronomy 7)
“Or hath God assayed to go and take Him a nation [people] from the midst of another nation, by temptations, by signs, and by wonders, and by war, and by a Mighty Hand, and by a stretched out Arm, and by great terrors, according to all that the LORD your God did for you in Egypt before your eyes?” (Deuteronomy 4:34)
[The answer to that rhetorical question is “NO!”]
“And what nation is there so great, that hath Statutes and Judgments so righteous as all this Law, which I set before you this day?” (Deuteronomy 4:8)
[The answer to that rhetorical question is "NONE!"]
“And what one nation in the earth is like Thy people Israel, whom God went to redeem to be His own people?” (I Chronicles 17:21)
[The answer to that rhetorically question is “NONE!”  There are different elements in the world.  The “world” that God “loved” and “for whom Christ died” is certainly not the same element in the world of which Scripture says, “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world; if any man love the world the Love of the Father is not in him” and “he who would be a friend of the world is the enemy of God” (which clearly infers that the world itself is the enemy of God).  Christ said that He prayed not for the world, but for His own whom God gave Him out of the world.]
“Sin is transgression of the Law” (I John 3:4)  This is defined even in one of the last books of the Bible to be written; written even after the Book of Revelation; which is also profound evidence—to those with understanding—that the Law was not abolished.  Had the Law been abolished, no one could sin: Therefore, there would be no need for anyone to repent of or to anything; no need for anyone to be forgiven, no need for anyone to “confess” anything.  How odd for the New Testament (and the Epistles of John) to speak so much of “sin” and “repentance” if there is no Law —if God “abolished it”.  Those who mindlessly quip, “Oh, God didn’t abolish all the Law, just most of it”.  —Prove it.  Give me the verse that says that.  And the logic that backs it up.  “He abolished everything but the 10 Commandments.”  First, GIVE ME THE VERSE.  Secondly, then why do you violate the Sabbath?  Why do you coddle adulterers / homoperverts?  Why do you covet?  Why do you allow murder, rape, theft, and false gods and idols in our Christian Land...?  Do you have “friends” who worship other gods?  Do you have friends who are homoperverts?  
God did not abolish everything but the 10 Commadments.  There is no passage in Scripture that you can offer to show that.  The 10 Commandments are not merely 10 individual laws—they are 10 Categories of Law under which each law of God is organized.  None were abolished.  What was abolished and nailed to the Cross was the DEATH WARRANT that was against us, the Curse of the Law—the Judgment for sin: “The soul that sinneth it shall die”.  It was “abolished” (not the Law itself, but the CASE AGAINST THE ELECT of God’s people) because Christ paid that price for us.  The Old Testament sacrificial offerings of blood from clean innocent animal victims for atonement was not itself abolished, but fulfilled, replaced by Christ’s Eternal Sacrifice of Himself.  He paid the death penalty.  His Body does NOT replace the law against eating ham sandwiches or pork chops or crab or shrimp any more than His Body replaced the law against homoperversion or race mixing or murder.  His Sacrifice did not replace the Law, but paid the Judgment for our violation of it.  Had the Law been abolished there would be no need to pay any Judgment for no Judgment exists where there is no law, for there can be no violation and therefore no penalty.
The one part of the Law (the animals sacrifices for sin) that Christ’s Sacrifice replaced (not abolished) was the remedy for violation of the whole Law of God and sinfulness in general.  No other part of the Law of Commandments, Statutes, Judgments, or Ordinances were abolished or replaced or “set aside”.  Christ paid our specific debt / our individual Judgment and then only that part of the Law that was for temporary atonement until Christ came, Christ replaced by His Own Eternal Sacrifice: the Schoolmaster [animal sacrifices] to lead us to Christ [the Perfect Lamb of God.  
[Remember, also, the only people who were allowed to approach the Tabernacle / Temple and have the Levitical priests offer up sacrifices for their sins for violating the Covenant that God made with Israel.]
“Not one jot or tittle...”, Christ declared.  “THINK NOT THAT I AM COME TO ABOLISH THE LAW”, Christ declared.  How can they claim to be “Christians” if they reject the foundational truth that He taught and commanded?  It is the Christian’s total ignorance, violation of, and hatred of the Law of God that is why there is no true revival.*  THAT is why God does not hear our prayers and THAT is why Christendom is about to fall for the first time in 2,000 years.  “OCCUPY TILL I COME.”  That cannot be accomplished when violating everything that God commanded.
[* True revival has little or nothing to do with the annual “revival meetings” that certain denominations schedule each year.  True revival is God’s people, being convicted of their violation of God’s Law, their repentance, and confession, asking God for forgiveness—and their turning to obey what God commanded.  Most of what passes for “Revival” is humanistic emotionalism.  For books on true revival, see In The Day of Thy Power, Wallis, The Power of Prayer, Prime, Stories of Great Revivals, Johnson et al, and Historical Collections Relating to Remarkable Periods of the Success of the Gospel / Historical Collections of Accounts of Revival, Gillies; all available from Sacred Truth Ministries.]
To whom was the Law given and for whom did Christ come...?  The New Testament is quite clear and cannot contradict the Old:
“4Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the [Shekinah] Glory [of God], and the Covenants, and the giving of the Law, and the Service of God, and the Promises; 5Whose are the Fathers [Patriarchs], and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came.” (Romans 9:4)
[For greater depth, see my Sacred Truth Expository Commentary of The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Romans, 758pp., pb., 40.00 + P&H.]
Remember also—
“15For He [God] saith to Moses, ‘I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion’.  16So then [concludes the prophet, or Paul] it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.” (Romans 9)
God determined who His people were—and that can never change because God Promised by Covenant and He is True and cannot lie or fail.  “I am Yahweh and change not: Therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.”  God determined who the elect of His people are and no one by his own will power can force himself into the Family of God.
Adoption itself pertains to Israel.  It is not the adoption of an alien into the family (which is an abomination); but the coming of age (while he is a child the heir differeth little from a servant; Galatians 4:1) or the reinstatement to a position of honor of a formerly disgraced family member (as depicted in the Parable of the Prodigal).
The Good Shepherd lays His Life down for HIS sheep—not sheep that are not His; not goats; not the dogs, or pigs or wolves.  The Good Shepherd is come to seek and to save that which is lost—not those who were never His.  Who is lost [in terms of the Biblical usage of the word]...?
“My people hath been lost sheep.” (Jeremiah 50:6)
“Give ear, O Shepherd of Israel, Thou that leadest Joseph like a flock.” (Psalm 80:1)
“10Hear the Word of the LORD, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, ‘He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd doth his flock.  11For the LORD hath redeemed Jacob, and ransomed him from the hand of him that was stronger than he’.” (Jeremiah 31)
“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 15:24)
“For Jacob my servant’s sake, and Israel mine elect...” (Isaiah 45:4)
“1Hearken to Me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the LORD: look unto the rock whence ye are hewn, and to the hole of the pit whence ye are digged.  2Look unto Abraham your father, and unto Sarah that bare you: for I called him alone, and blessed him, and increased him.  3For the LORD shall comfort Zion [Israel]: He will comfort all her waste places; and He will make her wilderness like Eden, and her desert like the garden of the LORD.” (Isaiah 51)
[The only ones who can look to Abraham and Sarah are those who actually legitimately descend from them.  Not anyone who merely has a drop of blood [illegitimately, through the violation of the Law of God] from Abraham and Sarah, but God decreed, “in Isaac shall thy seed be called”—only those who descend legitimately (untainted) through Adam-Shem-Abraham-Isaac-Jacob.  These alone are the peoples of  Christendom, who have not defiled themselves with the heathen.  The only one who can have the faith of Abraham is a legitimate descendent of Abraham through Isaac whom the Holy Spirit has regenerated unto life and given true faith.]
In II Chrononicles God said to godly Jehoshaphat, king of the southern confederation of Judah, through the prophet, “shouldest thou help the ungodly and do good unto them that hate the Lord? —therefore is there wrath upon you from before the Lord”.  Jehoshaphat was going to help his wicked, sinful, unrepentant cousin Ahab, king of the northern confederation of Israel.
If we are not to help our brethren who are godless, without incurring God’s Wrath, what do you think will result from helping our enemies—God’s enemies—from whom God commanded that we be separate?  There is a differnce between our personal enemy (a kinsman with whom we may be at odds) and God’s enemies (those entire peoples whom He cursed forever and commanded us to be separate and do nothing to help them).  If you don’t know the difference you need to stop studying everything until you learn the difference between a sheep and a dog or a pig.  And you need to stop following the false christ of the one-world, rainbow, gender-bender, interfaith Babylonian stew!  The God of the New Testament is the VERY SAME God of the Old Testament.  He changes not.  He is Holy.  His Morality does not change.  His Plan does not change.
To get around the truth of Scripture, evil man invented heresies such as “Dispensationalism” which declares that “God changed” and “God changed His Plan”; and that “He has different plans for different people at different times”.  This is heresy and makes the Word of God of none effect and it is a lie.  In order to believe it you have to throw the Old Testament out (but the Word of the Lord endureth forever)... and twist the New Testament into spiritual Silly Putty.  Most “Christians” don’t read or truly study the Bible or ask questions.  Most “Christians” don’t care; being little different (if at all) from the world.   They have been turned away from God in the schools, media, and corrupt, sterile churches.  Now they are foolish enough to have most of the master’s children breeding with the dogs on top of the table thinking that the master will be so proud! —while the few remaining master’s children who have refused to so sin against their father and have kept themselves pure from the world, have been forced to cower under the table and be content with the crumbs that the dogs drop them!  And such perverse-minded “Christians” think that this is the highest expression of love to their God...!  HOW ABOMINABLE!  But in reality, they don’t know God; and Christ will declare unto them that He does not know them.
The brave woman who wrote this article (which the reader may have already forgotten exists, see link at the beginning of this #2 Rumination) will soon find out how many black “friends” she truly has—and she shall find out how many will howl like baboons and hyenas and circle for the kill, wanting flesh and blood.  Racism, it seems is defined as “any white person who refuses to drink the Multi-cultural Kool-ade”.  Just drink the poison and die...!
WHO SAYS that “Racism” is evil? —and by what authority?  When did the term come into existence?  How on earth for 5,000 years did people recognize that which is considered the highest-mortal sin, before that word was invented?  Why did God bless the nations of the United States, Britain, and Canada, South Africa, and the other nations of Christendom in Europe during the times that they were all “die-hard racist neanderthals”...?  And why has God cursed Christendom ever since the peoples of Christendom have kow-towed to antichrists and other heathen, allowing corrupt politicians to make aliens “equals”, allowing them to build pagan temples in our lands, and then even intermarrying with them, destroying those families of our people forever...?  If you think that Christendom is better now than even 1970 or 1950 or 1860 or 1776 you are truly ignorant.  Do something about it.  Order books on true American history and European history that I reprint and recommend (or email for a list).  Spend some money and purchase a U.S. or World Almanac from let’s say 1920 or 1940 and get a modern one, and then compare certain statistics.  Most probably the modern Almanacs will be “politically correct” and obfuscate racial data.  Then also compare this information with “The Color of Crime” —  https://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/ — which utilized FBI and nationwide police statistic reports.  And stop drinking the Kool-ade.  It’s not “cool”...!  It is poison and it will leave an eternal burning in your throat after you hear, “Depart from Me, ye that work iniquity [lawlessness, anomia, “no law”—the violation of what God commanded]... I never knew you”.
Those who by their own impotent (devoid of authority) imperial decree claim that “racism” is “evil”, I ask: Why is it only “racism” when whites are the ones allegedly doing it, and not when nonwhites are doing it?  Why is it racism for the whites to build a wall along our southern border to keep out the Mexicans, while it is not racism for the Mexicans to erect the very same type of wall on their southern border to keep out the Guatemalans? or for the Jews to erect the very same thing to keep out the Africans, “modern” Egyptians, “modern” arabs, “modern” Syrians, and “modern” Persians?  Hmmmmmm?  What about that little thing called the Great Wall of China to keep out the Mongols?  It can be seen from space.
Why was it not racism for American indians (north, central, and south) to rape, kidnap, kill, and scalp (and eat) white people?  Why was it not racism for blacks to do the same thing to whites in Africa hundreds of years ago?  Is it not racism, currently throughout all of Christendom, when blacks rape, murder, vandalize, rob, assault, engage in riots, and commit mayhem against whites (even while declaring that they hate whites)...?  Why is it not racism for blacks to not work, have a dozen children, and expect the white taxpayer to pay for all their expenses for the rest of their lives—and all generations that will multiply like rabbits and live in the same careless, lawless manner?  Why is it not racism when 90% of white women who are raped and 90% of whites who are robbed, mugged / assaulted, and murdered are so violated by blacks—and have been ever since so-called Civil Rights...?  Very very few, if any, black women are ever raped by white men—and those few rare cases, if you check closely, you will find that the perpetrator is not white, in most cases, but a mixed blood dishonestly—defamatorily called “white”.
[They call mixed bloods "whites" when they commit crime, but they call them "persons of color" when they are in line for their welfare checks or preferential enrollment in college or preferential hiring in business and government.  This is dishonest, immoral, and criminal misrepresentation, and therefore fraud, racketeering, and grand theft.]
 Very few whites kill blacks and the majority of those murders that do occur are done in self-defense.  However, though blacks are guilty of 90% or more of white murders and whites are guilty of less than 3% of black murders, it is whites who are “racist”.  Explain that since NONE of the blacks in the U.S. now were ever slaves (nor even their parents or grandparents or great-grandparents) and since the majority of blacks today have moved here after the Civil War and their ancestors were never slaves owned by white people in the U.S.  Explain the justification of black animosity and cries of oppression and racism since less than 3% of white Southernors owned slaves (and some black southerns and black northerners themselves owned black slaves) and explain how 97% of white people who never owned slaves during the Civil War are guilty, especially since the Civil War was allegedly fought over slavery (which it was not).  The majority of white people in the U.S. did not have ancestors here at the time of the Civil War.  How can they be “guilty”...?  Why are whites guilty of slavery when black slaves imported to the U.S. during the time of slavery only accounted for 1% of the worldwide African slave traffic...?  Since the Jews nearly had a monopoly on the slave trade from start to finish, and the owners of the slave ships and the captains were Jews, how is it that white people are guilty because less than 3% of Southerners purchased 1% of the product that the Jews brought here?
After all the death and destruction that blacks have caused and after untold trillions of dollars have been given to blacks without improving them at all (based upon the same logic that would lead firemen to shout: “the fire is not out yet, quick throw some more gasoline on it!”)—it is the blacks who are racist and they are free to return to their beloved homeland and their beloved brethren.  Do they not love their own black people?
Some of the reasons why the U.S. is $20 trillion in debt is because of:
- the mind-boggling dollar amount of illegal / unconstitutional welfare programs, free health care, free housing, free food, free, free, free, ad nauseum, ad infinitum...
- the high cost of crime (from security devices, security guards, police, courts, prisons, and parole officers as well as the theft and damage of property),
- the higher cost of disease control,
- the hemmoragic rate of illegitimate children,
- the losing attempt to try to educate and moralize them,
—ever since so-called Civil Rights when NONE of this existed.  In 1950 the so-called U.S. National Debt was $257 billion.  
[Now as I re-write this in March of 2018 the so-called National Debt is over $22 Trillion! as Third-World aliens continue to swarm into our nation and breed like flies.]  
This is in addition to the illegal giving away of taxpayer money to hundreds of other nonwhite nations who are now dysfunctional hellholes that were once safe and prosperous white colonies!  This is in addition to the endless bevy of bureaucratic bovine that are now overpaid in endless new “government” agencies that are created to help control all the nonwhite aliens, such as the State Department’s “Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration” (PRM).  Such a Bureau itself is unconstitutional and treasonous!
We reap what we sow.  God commanded us never to seek the peace or prosperity, do good unto, or help the ungodly / those who are not His people.  “Therefore is there Wrath upon you from before the Lord.”  Our violation of these of God’s commands is the pathology of the greater part of all our problems.  Had we not sent financial aid, disaster relief, medical care, food, water, technology, and kept them from killing each other, their natural birth and death rates would have stabilized; but now they have so over-reproduced in their own nations (as they have in ours), their nations cannot contain them and they want to come and take all of Christendom from us!  “You reap what you sow.”  Failure to admit the problem is immoral and dishonest and foolish.  It is suicide.  Repent before God or embrace the tsunami.
 “24Wherefore [because of the sins of God’s people] I will bring the worst of the heathen, and they shall possess their [God’s people’s] houses: I will also make the pomp of the strong [of God’s people] to cease; and their holy places shall be defiled.  25Destruction cometh; and they shall seek peace, and there shall be none.” (Ezekiel 7)
This Judgment, chastisement is meant to bring God’s people to repentance... not merely to give you an early warning to kiss your butt goodbye.  In the midst of Judgment, God may be moved to deliver if His people actually turn from their wicked ways, seek His Face, and truly repent.
“12 ‘Therefore also now’, saith the LORD, 'turn ye even to Me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and with mourning: 13And rend your heart, and not [only] your garments, and turn unto the LORD your God: for He is Gracious and Merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth Him of the evil [that He promised to send upon you if you sinned, but which He will remove if you repent; for...].  14Who knoweth if He will return and repent [of Judgment if you repent of sin], and [instead of Judgment He may even] leave a blessing behind Him [for you]; [therefore, why not give] even a meat offering and a drink offering unto the LORD your God?” (Joel 2)
Many blacks in South Africa boldly confess that life for them was better under white rule than black rule.  Blacks live in greater poverty and black-on-black rapes and murders are 2,000x higher during black rule than during white rule.  Black-on-white murders are 20,000x higher under black rule than under white rule.  The white-on-black murders (which only occurred as retribution for violent crime) during white rule were so low that they cannot even be represented in a recognizable fraction in comparison to black-on-black or black-on-white murders during black rule.  Yet whites are “racist”.
The new black president of “Zimbabwe” (former prosperous white colony called Rhodesia) is now publicly inviting white farmers back to the nation and land from which they were driven; from which they fled to save their lives, because the black nation is starving and falling apart without the whites. My advice: Don’t Go!  Why help the enemy?  Why help sustain them so they can continue to multiply and then kill and eat you when they think you are no longer needed or which will inevitably happen because under black rule there is no way that you can be protected.
Entire prosperous nations like Rhodesia and South Africa were turned over to the blacks and they destroyed those nations like drunk, drug-high criminal youth joyriding, stealing, vandalizing, raping, and murdering with no though of tomorrow (which is how they generally live under any circumstance without white rule to restrain them).  Yet it is the whites who are “racist”.
Even the black pastor James Manning of ATLAH in New York City tells it straight up, “Blacks ain’t got no business running no nation”.  He tells blacks to be grateful that they are not in Africa, and he mentions how the blacks destroyed South Africa and how they have destroyed any nation that they enter in which they are allowed to take part in how the nation is governed.  He urges black people to just mind your place and be greatful.
[Do a web search and look for photos of South Africa during Apartheid and Now.  The difference will amaze you.  The same is evident in photos in the U.S. before so-called Civil Rights, and after.]
So, the blacks in formerly safe and prosperous colonies ruled by whites demanded “liberty” and “freedom from oppression”.  The whites left.  The blacks then destroyed the country and predate upon one another (and even for fun sadistically exterminated most all of the game reserve animals, mowing them down just for fun, such as taking out herds of zebra with a chain tied between two jeeps; killing just for the “fun” of killing anything that did not move faster than a bullet or a spear or a jeep).
So WHY have we had to continue to support them, deliver them from dirth and famine, civil wars, disease, natural disasters, etc., etc., etc. for the past 100+ years—since they asked us to leave them alone (after turning over to them the fully developed nations that the whites had built)...?  It is not that they were not skilled in the methods of civilization; but that they are incapable of civilization.
Our treasonous, corrupt politicians have illegally spent the lion’s share of the so-called U.S. National Debt of $20 trillion* on savages (home and abroad)... and yet we are still “racist”.  95% of HIGH DOLLAR professional and college athletes are blacks or other nonwhites; and the majority of government positions that give FULL BENEFITS (which is added to the massive burden of the taxpayers) are held by blacks...  and yet whites are “racist”.  I’m 56.  I’ve never had a paid holiday or sick day in my life; or company insurance or pension; or overtime or double-time (despite working over 80 hour weeks most of my life).
[* It is not the “National” Debt.  It is the PERSONAL debt of every politician (and their families) who illegally voted to misappropriate taxpayer money which they have no authority to do; and it is the PERSONAL debt of all individuals, businesses, and nations who received taxpayer money (welfare, national aid, subsidies, grants, etc.).]
The notion that “racism is evil” is evidence itself that the person who believes that statement has a mental disease.  And if it is a “Christian” who believes it, it is evidence that he does not know God or His Word.  God commanded us to hate evil.  God commanded His people to be separate from other people and not to help them in any way and to not mingle or intermarry with them—and not learn their ways!  Those who call “evil” what God called good, and those who call “good” what God called evil—are themselves evil and the enemy of God.
Is it “evil” or a “crime” for a human body to not want disease to invade it?  Is it “evil” or a “crime” to hate disease and death?  Is it “evil” or a “crime” to do all that is possible to keep disease out of the body?  Is that “anti-disease”...? and if so, is that a crime?
Why did Noah not say...?—
“What? only 2 mamba and 2 king cobra? only 2 termites and 2 hornets and 2 wasps and 2 scorpions and 2 black widows and 2 funnel web spiders?  Heck no!  BRING THEM ALL!  We are going to be on this ark for over a year... THE MORE THE MERRIER!”
Why did Noah not say that...? —because God is not stupid...!  Because God is Holy and God put a difference, a division between different types of creation.  None “evolved” out of the other.  God created some clean and some unclean (sheep and pigs did not descend from a common ancestor other than the elements of the earth from which God called them together) and He commanded that we respect the difference that He established.  “Everything after its own kind.”  All crosses / hybrids / mongrels are abominations and the attempt to destroy what God created.  THAT is the “hate crime”—and it is first and foremost against God.
 “24...I am the LORD your God, which have separated you from other people [in the very act of Creation; and then by command to respect that separation].  25Ye shall therefore put difference between clean beasts and unclean, and between unclean fowls and clean: and ye shall not make your souls abominable by beast, or by fowl, or by any manner of living thing that creepeth on the ground, which I have separated from you [in the very act of Creation; and then by command to respect that separation] as unclean.  26And ye shall be holy unto Me: for I the LORD am holy, and have severed you [in the very act of Creation; and then by command to respect that separation] from other people, that ye should be Mine.” (Leviticus 20)
All prospective politicians and all current politicians need to be given IQ tests, moral evaluation tests, as well as truth serum and lie detector tests and drug tests PERIODICALLY without notice.
The truth discriminates.  Reality discriminates.  EVEN EVOLUTION (for those foolish enough to believe it) DISCRIMINATES.  Yet those who are the loudest and most-ardent, even totalitarian champions of Evolution, the Evolutionaries themselves violate the basic tenets of their own faith: Natural Selection via survival of the fittest.  Hypocritically and destructively, they demand that the “most fit” sacrifice themselves to makes sure that “the least” fit not only survive—but thrive and overpopulate and replace the “most fit”.  That will result, not merely in the end of civilization, but the end of life.
Those who are ashamed of the truth, who are ashamed of what Christ taught, who are ashamed of God and His Decrees are not of God, and they will be denied by Christ before the Father.
Those who believe in a watered-down Christ and watered-down Doctrine will be spued out as lukewarm water themselves.
Stop being ashamed that God ordained you to be His child and commanded you to preserve that heritage!  To be ashamed of the Father’s Decrees and Plan is to be ashamed of the Father.  To hate the Father’s Decrees and Plan is to hate the Father.  Don’t you dare apologize to anyone for your Heavenly Father for any reason!  If you are ashamed of Him, He will be ashamed of you.
Stop apologizing.  Repent before God.  Obey God (without which there is no repentance).  Let the world that hates God be damned.  Let them fill up the measure of God’s Wrath and be ye not partakers with them in their evil.  If they don’t want to be damned, then let them repent, forsake all other gods, forsake humanism and evolution, forsake their own notions, confess their sins, ask for forgiveness, confess Christ as Lord, Saviour, and God, submit to God and His Plan and His people.  If they refuse to, then embrace Eternal Judgment in Hell.  Choose not to believe it.  You can choose not to believe 2 + 2 = 4.  That won’t change reality either.
If those who are friends of the world, if any are truly God’s people, we pray that God pours out His Holy Spirit upon them and leads them to the understanding of the truth, washes their minds of all the brainwashing, and regenerates their spirits unto life and obedience while there is time.
“Ye that love the Lord HATE EVIL.” (Psalm 97:10)  
That is a command.  Don’t apologize for it!  Stop calling “evil” that which God declared to be good and stop calling “good” that which God declared to be evil.  Doing so incurs God’s Wrath and Judgment!  It’s not your fault that evil is evil; unless you choose to be evil and partakers with them.
“8In Flaming Fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the Gospel of our Lord Christ Jesus: 9Who shall be punished with Everlasting Destruction from the Presence of the Lord, and from the Glory of His Power.” (II Thessalonians 1)
“Then shall He say also unto them on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, ye cursed, into Everlasting Fire, prepared for the Devil and his angels.” (Matthew 25:41)
Don’t apologize for that!
God declared—
“Shouldest thou help the ungodly and love them that hate the Lord, therefore is there Wrath upon you from before the Lord.” (II Chronicles 19:2)
That verse refers specifically to the godly King Jehoshaphat helping his own sinful kinsman King Ahab.  How much more an abomination is it to give that which is holy to the dogs and swine—which Christ forbade?  
Scripture tells us that if you even bid “Godspeed” (any “well wish”, greeting, or saluatation—which are actually blessings*) to those of our own kinsmen who reject Christ then YOU ARE PARTAKERS WITH THEM IN THEIR EVIL DEEDS (II John 1:10-11).  How much more, then, are we guilty before God for helping the heathen savages and antichrists and perverts whose nature is to destroy Christendom, from whom God commanded us to be separate and not to help them in any way for any reason?
[* —even if you don’t mean it: If you don’t mean it don’t say it! especially since God forbade it.  This includes pat expressions like “take care”, “have a nice day”, “travel safely”, etc.  It takes a little practice to get out of this bad habit of blessing those whom you don’t know, whom you don’t know whether they are in sin, whether they hate God; and especially if you know they are not God’s people, by their character, speech, appearance, and deeds (again, if you don't know the difference from a sheep or a dog or pig, you don’t belong on God’s farm in any position of authority; get one of those Playschool talking toys where you dial the picture of the barnyard animal, pull the little string; and it will tell you what the animal is and what it sounds like).  
This is a fatal flaw of modern Christendom—being cordial and friendly and even helping those who hate God!  The average “Christian” will be clueless concerning why this is wrong; but that is because they are clueless about Holiness and clueless about the Word of God (and pretty much clueless in general).  It takes a little practice, but you may say, “thank you”, “you’re welcome”, and / or “bye” when conducting business.  Even saying “Goodbye” is a blessing.  Goodbye in 1570 was godbwye, which is a shortened form of, “God be with ye”.
Years ago when the peoples of Christendom carried themselves circumspectly one did not even extend his hand to someone whom he did not know, if he did not know whether that person was friend or foe, or whether that person, though he appeared to be friend, if he was an enemy of God, an immoral reprobate, a pervert, a criminal, an infidel.
I was self-admonished one day, nearly 2 decades ago, when in my very small town (3,000) I turned the corner of a building on the narrow sidewalk and before I knew it a career politician had his hand in mine shaking it and smiling.  What a dirty trick!  He was out “politicking”—and he stuck to me as stealthily as a tick!  He was held claim to being one of the politicians who had held public office for the longest time, not only in my state, but in the nation.  He entered office with a few nickles.  By my day he was so wealthy he was donating millions of dollars to a hospital for a new wing that would bear his name.  I knew a different man who actually did hold the distinction of being longest full-time, uninterrupted man in public service in the entire U.S.—but he was an honest Christian.  It made nationwide headline news when he passed a few years ago.  However, the politician who stuck his corrupt sticky hand in mine caught me by surprise, like a mugger.  I would never have offered my hand to him, without first asking him where he stood on certain important moral and constitutional issues.  Unfortunately, like a gunfighter, he beat me to the draw when I wasn’t even looking; when I didn’t even know there was to be a gunfight.  I said very little and moved on; without mirroring the fake smile he was displaying.  For hours I was in a bit of chagrined stupor at being blindsided after having walked around that corner.]
God elsewhere decrees and commands—
“Be not deceived, God is not mocked, for whatsoever a man soweth that shall he also reap.” (Galatians 6:7)
“...they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.” (Hosea 8:7)
“Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness but rather reprove [rebuke] them.” (Ephesians 5:11)
“4Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.” (James 4:4)
Adultery / whoredom is also and most-flagrantly crossing the racial boundaries that God established.
The Apostate church is the Harlot of Revelation, who has lain down with all nations!
Come out from among her and be not partakers in her deeds if you would not be partaker in her Judgment.
Take careful note:
The Dragon / Serpent spewing forth a Flood to drown the woman and her child is Revelation’s prophecy of the Third-world flood that is innundating Christendom to destroy us and take what we have.  It is Satan’s plan to utterly mongrelize or murder the bride of Christ so that Christ has no bride to return to; and since God promised to preserve a remnant, if Satan can utterly destroy that remnant, he will have proved God not to be the Perfect, Omnipotent, Infallible God that He claims to be—and if God can fail in one single area, then it is possible that He can fail in other areas; and thus Satan will renew hopes that he can eventually defeat God altogether. That is why it is “open season” on white Christians—God’s true people.*  “Kill the heir and seize the inheritance!”  Christendom will soon look like any of those nature specials in which a school of sharks in a feeding frenzy are devouring any fish unlucky to be on the ocean floor; like any unfortunate creature that ventures into the river full of crocodiles, or discovered by a clan of hyenas.  It will soon look like any Third-world nation when a revolution breaks out (it already looks like that in most of our major cities).  Christ said that unless God draws short those end-time evil days, that not even the elect of His people—no flesh of them—would survive!  God save your people!
[* See my, Uncovering the Mysteries of Your Hidden Inheritance, for indefatigable, document proof.  Within the U.S.: 192pp., pb., 16.00 + 4.00 P&H; Hb., 26.00 + P&H.  It has been translated into Danish and Afrikaans, and it is being translated into Slovak and Swedish.]
This Third-world Flood is also the fulfillment of the prophecy of the Book of Daniel, the Great Image of the Chaldean monarch, Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon’s dream, whose feet and toes were comprised of iron mingled with clay.  Iron and clay are not cohesive / do not alloy / cannot hold together—they don’t belong together.  It is unnatural.  These feet of iron mingled with clay represent “integration”.  That is the hallmark of our corrupt current day and those mingled feet represents the last kingdom of this world.  In disgust, Christ will strike the feet (a mite bit harder than any toes I have been stepping on), the feet will crumble—they will be ground to powder by Christ, the Rock of Offense whom they hate (and the feeling is mutual)—the statue will fall, and 6,000 years of history and civilization will end.  Christ shall return with His holy angels to separate the wheat from the tares and uproot every plant that His Heavenly Father did not plant and all those who rejected His Doctrine and joined with and were polluted by the world—and these are the wicked of whom Christ will declare, “Bring those Mine enemies who would not that I should reign over them and slay them before Me”.  It is they who will wish the rocks to fall on them to hide them from the Wrath of the Lamb.  From there they will be cast into the Lake of Fire, with Satan, the Beast, and the False Prophet.
Put on your seat belt, it is going to be a bumpy ride.  There is no “Rapture”.*1  That notion is Jesuit-Zionist Counter-reformation propaganda.  Christ will not secretly snatch His people away.  He is coming to deliver His people from and destroy the wicked.  Last year, 2017,  possibly began the first year of the final Great Tribulation (if in fact it is 7 years long; no Scripture says so—though there shall indeed be a time of Great Tribulation: the Time of Jacob’s Trouble when God shakes the heavens and earth once again, “as in the Days of Noah”*2).  2017 was the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Reformation.  Sadly, 95+% of so-called “Christians” have no clue about the history or doctrine of the Reformation (a majority probably could not even tell you what the Protestant Reformation was, or even name one or two Reformers—let alone the dozen that a Christian should be able to name*3), and if they heard the doctrine they would reject it as demonic—so polluted are their minds with Antichrist, world-friendly, humanistic false doctrine).  2017 was also 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution, which began the systematic extermination of 180 million white Christians across eastern Europe.*4
[*1 See my, The Futurist and Rapture Conspiracy, 164pp., 13.00 + P&H within the U.S.
*2 Christ said,
“37But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the Coming of the Son of man be.  38For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39And knew not until the Flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” (Matthew 24)  
The size of the Remnant saved was very small in number.  How was it in the days of Noah?  They departed from sound doctrine.  Since there in nothing in and of itself wrong with eating, drinking, and marriage, then clearly their sin was eating, drinking, and marrying in complete violation of all the moral boundaries that God established: eating and drinking that which God had not permitted them to eat; engaging in types of relations that God had not permitted: homoperversion, crossing racial boundaries, incest, pedophilia, bestiality, in addition to the angels that sinned and left their first estate (celibacy) and abducted Adamite women and raped them, siring giants, etc.  See also Romans 1:18-32 and Genesis 6:11-13.
*3 Every Christian needs to read at least, Twelve Reformation Heroes (1960) Neilson, 96pp., pb., 12.00 + P&H, which I reprint.  It contains 12 brief biographies.  After that, they need to read The Story of the Light That Never Went Out, (1903) W.S. Martin and Augusta Cook; 586pp., 8.5x11, pb., 45.00 + P&H, which I reprint, and Foxe’s Book of Martyrs (which I shall be reprinting soon (2019); inquire).  After that, there are dozens of other important titles on the Reformers and the Reformation and Reformed Doctrine (email for a list).  A biography of Ulrich Zwingli and the book, Here I Stand, a life of Martin Luther, are a must.
*4 —the real holocaust.  What...?  You’ve never heard of it?  I wonder why... See: The Human Cost of Soviet Communism, Prepared at Request of Sen. T. Dodd for Subcom. to Investigate Administration of Internal Security Act and other Internal Security Laws of Committee on Judiciary U.S. Senate, 1971, 40pp., 5.00 + P&H; and The Secret Holocaust, Mullins, 34pp., 4.00 + P&H.]
Christianity is not a “good feeling”—it is Doctrine.  What passes for “Christianity” today is pseudo-spiritual pagano-humanism.
Repentance is not mere “regret”.  Repentance is turning from what God forbade, confessing it, asking forgiveness for it, and turning to what God commanded.  How can people do that if they don’t even know what God forbade and what He commanded?  They cannot.  Faith is established by the facts, the doctrine of God’s Word.
“Without faith it is impossible to please God.”
“Faith without works is dead”
[—because true faith produces works that God “before ordained that we should walk in them”.]
“Whatever is not of faith [the established doctrine of the Word of God] is sin.”
Much of modern “Christianity” is abominations, superstition, paganism, and humanism with a thin candy-coating veneer of Christianity, like tiny candy sprinkles on arsenic-laced cupcakes.  Pure oxygen is inflammable: it will burst into flames from a spark.  Our atmosphere is 21% oxygen: while it allows a flame to burn, it does not burst the air into flames at that concentration.  At what % does oxygen cease to be inflammable? at what % does the oxygen in our air not sustain life (of flame or lungs / brain tissue?)...?  
At what percentage of dilution is arsenic safe to drink in water (or any other potable liquid)...?  
[It’s called ppm (parts per million) or ppb (parts per billion) and it has to be a really, really small number before the million /  billion.  The answer (at least, what the U.S. Government health agencies have declared to be safe levels) is: 0.010 ppm.  .01 is 1%; so .010ppm = 1/100th of a million or .01 x 10-6.]  
At what % does a glass of orange juice cease to be orange juice and become sewer water, if orange juice is removed drop by drop and replaced drop by drop with sewer water?  
At what % does faith in Christ and God cease to be faith in Christ or God? that is, if what is believed about God or Christ is not consonant with reality? that is, if it is conflict with what Scripture clearly reveals?
How can many denominations and millions of adherents call themselves “Lutherans”, “Presbyterians”, or “Calvinists” if they reject many of the core doctrines taught by Luther, Knox, and Calvin (or even apologize for the doctrines and statements by those Reformers)...?
How many points of resemblence in a portrait could be replaced and the portrait still represent the person whom it claims to represent?
How much Bible doctrine can one remove from his “Christianity”—or how much Bible Doctrine can a person be completely ignorant of—and it still be Christianity; that is, the true faith; that which Christ will recognize as Himself?  Since the exact “point of no return” cannot be known; does it not make more sense to see how close you can get to what God declared and commanded, rather than attempting to see how far you can get from Him and how close to the world you can get without finding out that you were never His?
[* Have you ever spoken to someone on the phone, over an extended period of time, and then finally met that individual in person, and in your mind you are thinking, “Wow, you look NOTHING like how I pictured you in my mind”...?  THAT is the problem that most “Christians” have with God; and for the same reason.  Imagine the average “Christian”, meeting God on Judgment Day, saying, “Wow, You look NOTHING like how I pictured You in my mind”.  Imagine God replying, “That’s because you do not know Me!  The reason that you do not know Me is because YOU REJECTED MY OWN WORD that taught you about Me, and instead, invented a false god in your mind.  Depart from Me, I never knew you!”]

Humanists, who deludedly fancy themselves to be Christians (whose eyes are on what is pleasing to self and what self thinks is “reasonable”) imagine these questions to be silly.  Their minds are tainted by destroyers of the Christian faith from within (Armenius, Kierkegaard, Brunner, Schleiermacher, and Barth, even if they are completely ignorant of those men and their doctrines, as surely as their body is contaminated by the food they eat, even if they are ignorant of the chemical names of the ingredients on the label of the food that they probably don’t even read, much less understand).  However, true Theology, true Doctrine is what God decreed; not what man prefers to believe.  In this Scripture is perfectly clear.  
A person can choose to only concentrate on the “happy” verses of Scripture—but that does not cause all the other, more dread verses, to cease to exist.  God commanded, “no other gods”—and that includes false notions of God in your mind.  
The Bible clearly reveals that God’s Name is Yahweh, and that He created all that exists, He is Holy, Just, Perfect, Immutable, Omniscient, and Omnipotent, He is Spirit (pure energy) and Who has determined all, and that He sent His Son to be born as an Israelite of the House of Judah, under the Law to redeem His people, that is, those of His people who were ordained unto life before the foundation of the world, if they confess their sins, repent / turn from their sin, and turn to obedience to all that God commanded (which is what repentance is).  
Tell me, if you choose to believe that instead, God is a concept and that all religions are the same, and that God is a mere spectator in His universe most of the time, and that He watched the universe evolve; and all you have to do is believe passionately in what you think is good and try to be good and that there is no Judgment because God loves everybody and that Jesus died for everyone so everyone’s sins are already forgiven and all you have to do is your best according to what you think is right... you do not believe in the God of the Bible.  
Furthermore, there will be a line somewhere in between the true God that I described first, and the humanists notion of God (if he believes in one) that I mentioned second, a line or a point between the two extremes that only God knows, separates a person from actually believing in the true God.  That line of separation leaves that person in unregeneracy and his only future will be Eternal Judgment.  Does it not then behoove a “Christian” to accept 100% what the Word of God declares—not according to liberal, humanistic “interpretation” (which is Swiss Cheese theology), but the harmonious whole that is without any contradiction?  It does not require any great amount of education or a high I.Q. to understand this harmonious doctrine.  It requires putting aside and eschewing man’s ideas and what man thinks is “nicer” to believe; and fully submit to God as Supreme.  We can understand clearly everything that He said.  We cannot always comprehend WHY He determined to decree and do certain things.  But that is where faith and submission and obedience comes in.  He is the Father / Master.  We are His sons / servants.  It is not our place to question why.  It is our place to obey.
The solution to all these questions is to stop seeing how far you can get from what is pure and life-sustaining and see how close you can get to the Standard that God established.
Remember: You DON’T EVER need to ask the Devil for permission to obey God!
“1Let us therefore fear, lest, a Promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.  2For unto us was the Gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the Word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.” (Hebrews 4)
Again, faith does not have its origin in man, but in God; and those who do not have faith do not have it because God has not deemed to give it unto them, having not predestined them unto Life.  The “them” in this passage is easily discovered by looking in the last verses of chapter 3 of Hebrews, where one discovers that the “them” refers to the faithless Israelites who wandered in the wilderness for 40 years.  The “us” is easily discerned since the name of the book in which these passages appear is “Hebrews”.


#3 - Christians and the Issue of Gay Wedding Cakes and Floral Arrangements


Dr. Frank Wright interviews someone; then a brief portion of a sermon by D. James Kennedy; followed by another interview by Frank Wright:


My comments below:

This is a good presentation (the video link above), in 3 different parts.  The interview in the last part is that of a woman who owns a floral shop; but it is a sad and abominable revelation.  Part of the problem is her own misconception of “godliness”.  She talks about the gay employees that she has had; and she speaks of one long-term gay client whom she considered a friend, and when that gay person wanted her to do the arrangements for his same-sex wedding, she took his hand in hers, and hugged him, and said she could not, but she provided the contact information for 3 other florists who would do it for him, and she wanted his wedding to be the best that it could be, though she could not participate.  This is a nauseating confused notion of godliness and is actually UNGODLINESS!  She is double-minded, has divided loyalties, does not understand holiness or sin—and therefore she does not even know God and does not love Him.  She tries her best (like most “Christians”) to straddle the fence and be a friend of the world and a friend of God—but it is IMPOSSIBLE.  Presumably (if the sacrifice is not too great) she gives God “the benefit of the doubt” and “top billing”.  However, God will not accept mere top billing—but EXCLUSIVE obedience and worship and loyalty and submission.  This woman is terribly compromised and does not know God, and therefore, her imaginary “stance” on this issue does not honor God and is actually a waste of time and impotent!  God commands us to HATE evil—the evil itself; the sinner (not merely some “dark aura” or “bad vibes / energy” or some “abstract idea” completely separate from the vile pervert himself).  God also tells us that to love the Lord is to HATE evil.  You cannot love the Lord and not hate evil; though you can hate evil and not love the Lord.  Ungodly people hate; but that does not mean they love the Lord.  David, one of the purest-hearted characters in all of Scripture, the only one whom God called, “a man after the Lord’s Own Heart” penned—

“21Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate Thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against Thee?  22I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.  23Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts: 24And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the Way Everlasting.” (Psalm 139)

Ganhdi—a Hindu—greatly popularized the heresy, “God hates the sin but loves the sinner” or “God loves the sinner but hates the sin” in his 1925 autobiography.  No, God says that He hates the wicked themselves.  The declaration, “God hates the sin but loves the sinner”, of course, is true if you are talking about the regenerate elect of God’s people; but it is not true if you are talking in generalities or about the wicked who will never be converted.  Christians need to realize that He deals with the elect of His people as sons; but that He does not deal with those who are not His people in that fashion and His Love and His Mercy do not extend to them because that is what He determined and decreed.

[One terribly deluded (or terribly conspiratorial) media spokesperson, after the death of Gandhi,* while Gandhi was being eulogized, this mindless or subversive commentator declared of Gandhi, something to the effect “He was the greatest Christian I ever knew”.  He was a HINDU...!  What don’t you understand?  That’s like someone, after King Kong died, declaring, “He was the greatest human I ever knew...!” —no... he was a gorilla!  Evolution, humanism, and socialism truly rot the brain.

* Gandhi was a terrorist who did not repent of his terrorism, but simply learned that he could spearhead a “soft revolution” with propaganda, more easily than a hard revolution with violence.  Mandela was cut from the same cloth, and emulated and achieved the same godless, immoral conspiratorial revolution once his realized, at least, at that time, that an outright violent revolution would not succeed because the white people had not yet been dumbed down into false guilt and rainbow love which opens them up for the knife in the back once they lay down their power and their means of self-defense.]

Though Gandhi popularized the false doctrine,  Solomon said, “there is no new thing under the sun”.  Sadly, Presbyterian Scotsman Horatius Bonar in his Everlasting Righteousness (1873) made that same anti-intellectual, unbiblical blunder.  But God does not merely hate the “sin”.  Sin is not a “free-floating phenomena”: it does not exist outside of a person (though its results may).  The sin is not a separate entity that can be separated from the sinner.  It is not the “sin”, but the sinner, that God punishes on earth and whom God commanded to be punished, even put to death.  It is not the “sin” but the sinner that will be cast into Hell.  Those who are cast into Hell will not be cast there because God “loves” them.  God is True.  God is not double-minded (which God said causes one to be unstable in all his ways).  God does not love whom He hates nor bless whom He hates (nor curse or condemn to Hell those whom He loves).  Consider also:

“the LORD will [doth] abhor the bloody and deceitful man.” (Psalm 5:6)

“God judgeth the righteous, and God is angry [enraged] with the wicked every day.” (Psalm 7:11)

[The Hebrew means, “to foam”.]

“For the wicked boasteth of his heart’s desire, and blesseth the covetous, whom the LORD abhorreth.” (Psalm 10:13)

“The LORD trieth the righteous: but the wicked and him that loveth violence His Soul hateth.” (Psalm 11:5)

“The Face of the LORD is against them that do evil, to cut off the remembrance of them from the earth.” (Psalm 34:16)

“Ye that love the LORD, hate evil.” (Psalm 97:10)

[Again, evil is not a “free-floating” phenomenon.  It can only be hated in the individual that produces it.]

“21Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate Thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against Thee?  22I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.  23Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts: 24And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.” (Psalm 139)

[David, the only man God calls a man after His Own Heart, declared this.  Nowhere does God rebuke Him.  This is inspired Holy Writ.  This is the proper position.  Those who do not have the same Mind as God in what God has declared are not of God.  When David sinned, we see clearly in Scripture, God rebuked Him.  Nowhere does God rebuke or correct David, as He did Job.]

“16These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: 17A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, 18An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, 19A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.” (Proverbs 6)

[Proud looks, lying tongues, evil hearts, bloody hands, feet that run to mischief, etc., don’t exist outside of human bodies.  Have you ever seen any that do...?  God indeed hates these things and holds them in abomination, but He doesn’t “hate the tongue and love the jaw”.  The tongue speaks what the mind tells it to; the mind devises what is in its nature to think.  Evil natures produce evil.  There are no good natures except in the elect of God’s people whom God has regenerated unto life and they are new creatures, with Christ as their source, not fallen Adam (and they have access to that New Source for daily Grace as long as the walk in the Spirit).]

“The fear of the LORD is to hate evil.” (Proverbs 8:13)

[Again, evil is not a “free-floating” phenomenon.  It can only be hated in the individual that produces it.]

“The mouth of strange women is a deep pit: he that is abhorred of the LORD shall fall therein.” (Proverbs 22:14)

[Though it is not part of the main point, it should be realizeed that “strange [zoor] women” here does NOT refer to those of alien race (though it can include them).  The issue is a man being unfaithful to HIS WIFE, and, therefore, ANY OTHER WOMAN is a “strange” woman, in this context.  The Hebrew word is also used of someone who is not of the Aaronic family approaching unto holy things to partake of them.  These Hebrew words do NOT in and of themselves mean “alien” (that is “nonIsraelite”).  Only context can supply that meaning.  See Numbers 16:40 (iysh-zoor, which should be translated, “strange man”).  The same goes for EVERY Hebrew or Greek word for “stranger / alien”—including nokriy.  Genesis 31:15 Leah and Rachel indicate that their father Laban treated them like strangers (nokriy), which does not mean that he treated them as if they were Nubians, but as if they were not his daughters (that is, because of his greed he was merely making merchandise of them, not doing that which was for their good).  I Kings 8:41 clearly refers to a non-Israelite—but it does NOT refer to a nonkinsman.  It refers to a pure Adamite-Semite-Hebrew not descended through Jacob-Israel.  Such pure kinsmen strangers could approach unto the “court of the Gentiles [nations]” but enemy aliens, peoples whom God cursed, nonAdamites, mixed peoples could not.  For more details on this topic, see my booklet series, Apologetic Expositions, and specifically that on Isaiah 56.]

“As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.” (Romans 9:13)

[God is not of limited vocabulary or of impaired logical thought.  He did not say that He hated Esau’s sin, but loved Esau.  It is not the “sin” but the sinner that shall be punished in Everlasting Fire.  See my massive, highly detailed book, What the Devil? — What the Hell?  If the wicked are consumed in the Fire there is no purpose for it to be “Eternal”.  If the wicked cease to exist it is no longer punishment, and therefore, it is not Eternal.  Humanists (masquerading as “Christians”) think that God is limited to being, thinking, and acting only as sinful man thinks is proper for God to so be, think, and act.]

Though this is not a popular topic, not everthing is supposed to give you the warm fuzzies.  That is not why God issued His Decrees.  He has decreed all for His Own Good Pleasure, not to titilate the fantasies and emotional roller-coasters of humans.  We are to preach the Full Counsel of the Word of God; not just those portions that make us feel good.  God’s Attributes are not like a box of chocolates, for man to pick and choose which he likes and discard the rest.

Furthermore, this entire issue of gay wedding cakes and floral arrangements is wrongly conceptualized and that is why the professed Christian bakers are losing in court and why the professed “Christian” florist mentioned above will lose.  This issue has nothing to do with “discrimination”—THAT is a SMOKESCREEN.  It has to do with someone asking an individual or business for a product or service that they do not provide.  It has to do with contract law and no one is bound to contract when he does not want to.  We have the UNLIMITED freedom to contract and not contract (and that even includes the right to discriminate, though that is not the main issue).

Tell me, can you walk into a 5-star restaurant (not following the dress code) and order a plate of Nachos and a beetle grubs.  If you try, you will hear:

“I am sorry sir, that is not on our menu and you need a jacket, tie, and shoes or you must leave at once.  What...?  I don’t care that Nachos is the favorite food in Mexico or that beetle grubs are considered a delicacy in Ethiopia.  They are not on our menu.  For the Nachos, I suggest that you try Taco Bell across the street—and while you are there, why don’t you ask them for a plate of Chateaubriand with truffle-mint sauce, asparagus almondine with dill-mustard-Modena balsalmic vinegrette glaze, a glass of red wine, and Cherries Flambé for dessert.  See if they will serve it to you.  As far as the beetle grubs, you are on your own and I could care less whether you find someone to serve them to you or not.  Now please, go, flies are starting to gather.  What?  No, I am not a racist pig.  Nachos is not on our menu; neither are insects, entrails, or dung.  What?  No I don’t speak Spanish or Swahili or Urdu and that does not make me a racist pig either!  Leave before I call the police.”

Could you walk into a vegetarian restaurant and demand a bloody-rare hunk o’ steak, veal cutlet, and fois gras?

Could you go to a Jewish baker and demand a “Happy Auschwitz” cake...? or go to a Black baker and demand a “KKK cake with a burning cross”...?

Could you go to a baker and demand bread made with human brains (“sweet-breads”) ...?

Could you go to MacDonald’s and demand that they serve you a Whopper...?

Could you go to a mattress store and demand to buy a Ford F-150...?

Could you go to your heart doctor and demand to hire him to mow your yard...?

Could you go to a child’s dentist and demand that he take you on as a client...?

Could a white person go to the United Negro College Fund and demand money for college...?  

[You should be able to, if they are going to “interpret” “equally” what they consider to be the law: Negros overturned Stephen Girard’s legal will and forced Girard College [a primary and secondary school in Philadelphia, not actually a college] to admit Blacks and pay scholarships to them in 1960s I think.  Girard established in his WILL this school and fund exclusively for poor, orphan boys of Philadelphia.  Now Blacks are about 95% of those who receive his money.  That is a crime—GRAND THEFT!  He was the wealthiest man in American in his day.  Ye the United Negro College Fund, Thurgood Marshal Foundation, and a plethora of scholarships (such as those established, if I remember correctly, by people like Oprah Winfrey and Bill Gates) that are exclusively for only nonwhite students... continue unchallenged.]

Could you go to a Muslim baker and demand a wedding cake with lard frosting...? and a figurine of Jesus on the cake saying, “There is only one God”...?

Could you go to Chucky-Cheese and order a shot of whisky...?   

Could you go to a Jewish bookstore and demand a bumper sticker that says, “I love Jesus!” ...?

This is all simple logic.  It is simple contract law.  It is common sense and decency (2 things the majority of “people’ in modern society do not have).  You cannot force someone to offer goods and services that are not on his menu or which offend his core values / religion.  The Christian religion is “grandfather claused into” the U.S. Constitution.  No other religion is.  If you don’t like it, find another nation; or better yet, start your own and stop living parasitically off someone elses labor and stop trying to steal someone elses inheritance.

Yet hypocritically, people ARE being discriminated against (but not those the media and government claim to be being discriminated against)—and they are being persecuted and unjustly prosecuted—left and right for being “homophobes” or “racist” or for violating some pseudo-law by not being “politically correct” because they happen to speak the truth or simply because they are proud of and attempt, quietly, to preserve their own heritage and because they are obeying the Word of God with a sincere conscience as their religion demands.

[* And yet such mentally deranged people flaunt their perversion and celebrate their race and perversion openly in public parades and holidays—and FORCE it on everyone else.  THAT is discrimination.  THAT is intimidation / terrorism.  THAT is a hate crime.  Why are there not criminals being prosecuted for being Antichristianite / Christian-ophobes...?  Anti-caucasian / Cacausianophobes...?  Anti-german / German-ophobes...?  Anti-racist / Racist-ophobes...?  Anti-straight / hetero-phobes...?  The pendulum swings both ways if there is “equal protection” under the Law.  However, the pendulum swings even farther when one realizes that our Founders NEVER intended “equal protection” for aliens, enemies, perverts, criminals, or antichrists.]

The bakers should reply,

“I will bake you a normal, plain wedding cake and you can take it home and decorate it however you want: You can frost it with dog feces for all I care.  But we don’t decorate cakes the way that you want them decorated.  We also don’t decorate cakes in the Arabic, Chinese, Hindu, Hispanic, Yiddish, or any African language.  Sorry, we are not Arabic, Chinese, Hindu, Hispanic, Yiddish, or African.  I suggest that you find a good Arabic, Chinese, Hindu, Hispanic, Yiddish, or African baker—I hear there are plenty in Arabia, China, India, Latin America, the Land of Israel, or Africa!  We are not discriminating against you; you are discriminating against us—actually, you are engaging in terrorism against us—by forcing your way into our business and demanding that we provide goods and services that are not on our menu and then attempting to intimidate us because such things are not on our menu.  We’ve been in business 20 years.  This is how we have run our business for 20 years.  Our clientele is happy with what we provide.  If you are not happy with what we provide, why don’t you start your own business...?  It’s a free country.  Why are you trolling for lawsuits instead of actually producing something?”

This exposes the vapid stupidity of the myth of “equality” of all people and all religions all cultures and all governments.  If they are diametrically opposed there can be no equality.  Ones right to not provide a service is going to be opposed to someone elses right to demand a service.  Has anyone ever played rock, paper, scissors?  What is not to understand?  All things are not the same.  If you think they are, next time you go to the dentist ask for cyanide gas instead of happy gas.  Let me know how it works out.  Who has the “greater right”...? —the individual minding his own business, living his life, without interfering in someone elses life by a violent intrusion.  This does NOT include not liking a sign in someone elses window, a book someone else wrote, a t.v., radio, or internet channel that someone has, if it has information that “offends you”.  If it offends you, here’s a news flash—DON’T GO THERE.  If you do go there, and you are offended, it is NO ONES fault but your own.  If you did not know what it was THEN LEAVE.  Once you know what it is DON’T GO BACK.

In reality, sane people know that there is no such equality.  It is being forced upon Christendom to destroy us; NOT to provide a wonderful utopia where all peoples and lifestyles and religions can hold hands, dance along sidewalks made of jelly beans, and clouds of cotton candy float by and everyone sings wonderful sounding songs of meaningless tripe.  It is a myth.  It is a deadly myth.  No nonwhite, nonchristian nation offers equality in anything.  As I have long written: If two opposing sides meet on the field of battle for sport or war and one side religiously follows a rigid set of rules and the other side follows no rules at all, apart from Divine Intervention, the side that follows no rules will win every time.  God never told us to recognize anyone as equal—especially not those who are Antichrist perverts.  How many movies have you seen (or how many novels have you read) in which the bad guy feigns to have a tinge of conscience and tries to convince the good guy for both of them to lay down their weapons and “be friends”...?  In the movie theatre the audience may be shouting to the good guy, “—don’t do it you fool! he has another gun hidden behind his back...!”  How ever more stupid, then, is it to lay down your only means of self defense when the enemy makes no effort to lay down his...?  If they want equality, let them stay in their own nation.  Why do they hate their own people so much they want to leave their nation anyway?  They want to steal ours from us.  Why don’t all the homopeverts migrate anywhere they want and form their own nation, “Homopervertia”...?  Wonder how long it would last?  That’s the point.  They are parasites.  We are the host.

That woman with her own florist shop, sadly, showed her own stupidity and lack of understanding the Word of God.  She could hug a homosexual, hold his hand, tell him she loved him [!], hope he had a wonderful wedding [!], but could not do the flowers for him.   That is semi-perverse and DOUBLE MINDED (and God said that a double minded man is unstable in all his ways) and that shows that she does NOT HATE EVIL and that shows that she does not love God... she has some vague “superstition” that she thinks is “Christianity” (but it is not) and that is all that she has.  She does not understand sound Bible Doctrine and therefore, what she believes is not Christianity.  It is a humanism with some “Christian-like” notions.

The issue is, a florist / baker should say:
“I am not discriminating against gays.  I will bake a gay person a cake, but I will not bake a gay cake for any person: I will not decorate a cake for him or anyone else in a manner that violates my religion, morals, and conscience (or business ethics).  I won’t decorate an x-rated cake; nor will I decorate a cake with curse words.  I won’t decorate a cake in any manner that blasphemes my God and which would be a violation of the Law that He commanded that we obey.  I will bake a cake for a Muslim too; but I won’t bake a cake saying, “Jesus is not God,.  There is only one God, Allah and Muhammad is his prophet.  I will bake a cake for a Hindu, but won’t put the gods Shiva or Vishnu on the cake—or any other word or symbol.  I will bake it and frost it.  You can decorate it however you want.”
The answer would the same with floral arrangements:
“I will sell flowers and flower arrangements to a “gay” or a Muslim or a Jew or a Hindu.  BUT I will NOT add any figures or symbols or words or decorations that violate my conscience and religion.  But would prefer if you purchased such things from your own people.  I really don’t want your business.  If you have a business I will never be a patron of yours; I will not support you or your business in any way, and would prefer that you were not a patron of mine.  I will not refuse to serve you; but I will only serve you want is on our standard menu.”
The “gay” person is not being discriminated against.  The baker will bake and sell him a cake, but they don’t decorate cakes the way that he wants them decorated.  He can decorate them himself.  It is not discrimination against him to not provide for him a service that the business does not provide.  Target, in their antichrist retaliation, removed the Bible from their stores.  Is that not discrimination?  What if someone wants to buy a Bible?  
An alien or homopervert or adherent to a pagan religion can no more force himself into the life of a baker or florist than the baker or florist can force themselves into his.  Discrimination—and harassment (which is what it is when they go trolling for lawsuits) and intimidation and persecution are not a one-way street.  If you go looking for a fight and end up in a fight YOU are to blame.  If you go looking for someone who WON’T decorate a cake the way that you want it decorated THAT IS BAD FAITH on your part and YOU are the criminal.  If you’ve already found 11 bakers who will bake the cake the way that you want... why do you keep looking?  You never wanted a cake.  You were shopping for a lawsuit.  That is supreme bad faith.
The florist in the above video link sold flowers to the homosexual for years.  What she should have said was:
“I will be glad to sell you flower arrangements for your wedding, it matters not to me what the occasion is, that is between you and God.  But I will not add symbols, figures, or words that violate my religion.  You are free—on your own—to find and purchase those decorations that you want elsewhere, and add them yourself.  I will not participate in your wedding in any way.  I will deliver the flowers, but not set them up and not stay and celebrate.  It is a business arrangement and that is how I do business.  I will arrange and sell flowers to anyone, but if they want them decorated in a manner that violates my conscience, my morality, my religion, my God and requires me to blaspheme my God by ignoring the morality that He commanded, then I cannot participate in that, but I will sell you the flower decorations.”  
That is not discrimination.
However, the problem was, this emotionally led, Biblically confused woman had already crossed the line.  She told the homoperver that she loved him!  She told him that she hoped he had a wonderful (homopervert) wedding!  She provided a list of other florists who would provide the arrangements that he wanted!  She gave him a hug!  She held his hand!  She called him a dear “friend”...!  She opened the door.  She crossed the line.  God commands separation.  Clearly she went above and beyond a mere “business relationship” with evil, not understanding what God commanded.  You don’t smile and tell evil that you love it!  God said to hate it.  You cannot straddle the fence and think that God will bless or protect you.  God is not merely the “main god” in your totem pole”.  He is to be the ONLY GOD IN YOUR UNIVERSE.
A Muslim or Jew with a restaurant (if they obey what they believe to be their own dietary laws) cannot refuse to sell a nonmuslim or a nonjew a meal... but he CANNOT be FORCED to cook pork for them... because pork is not on the menu and violates their conscience—even if that customer claims that pork is part of his religion.  If pork is part of his religion then he is a fool for going to someone of another religion to provide that meal!  
[—and if Christians understood the Bible they would realize that pork is condemned by the Christian religion also; but they do not understand the Bible and they do not understand Christianity.  See my booklet, So, You Call Yourself A Christian....]
Note: Pork is a meat.  But it is a meat that a Jewish or Muslim butcher or restaurant does not sell.  
Note: 1 man and 1 woman is the traditional marriage and the only Christian marriage.  There may be “other types of marriage”, which certain confused and perverse minds recognize; but we do not offer that on our menu of baked goods or flower arrangements (and the same thing applies to ministers, or even government officials who are in a CHRISTIAN nation).  You can’t expect a Christian baker to decorate a cake or flower arrangement with Talmudic or Koranic references or figures.  Those who would demand them to are the ones who are being insulting and hateful.  Christian bakers or florists also should not tolerate violant, insulting attitudes or customers who use obscene language and it is their right to then say, “I am sorry, we do not want your business.  I want you to leave now and not come back, ever, you are not welcome here.  It is not because you are a Jew or Muslim or Hindu or homopervert, but because you are a borderline psychopath: you don’t understand boundaries.  You are rude, insulting, demanding, and offensive.”
Furthermore, if Christian practices violate a MUSLIM’s or JEW’s “conscience”, then why did they move from a Muslim or Jewish nation to a CHRISTIAN NATION?  On the record, under oath, tell me: What is the stated plan of Islam, according to the Koran, in having Muslims move to Christian lands?  What is the stated plan of Judaism, according to the Talmud, in having Jews move to Christian lands?  When you or the Muslims / Jews who “paved the way for you”, entered Christian lands, did you or they “pretend” to be Christians only until enough Jews or Muslims moved to the Christian land and then once they had enough political clout then remove the “Christian masque”...?  Did you only champion “tolerance” when it ONLY BENEFITTED YOU, but now that you have all the power you think that you need, you show no tolerance to anyone other than yourself—and you never planned to.  Is that not true?  Nothing (no legal status) arises out of fraud.
Regardless, it is not a matter of discrimination to refuse to DECORATE cakes or flowers in an immoral fashion; that is turning the cart around.  The issue is that someone of another religion or perverse “morality” FORCING YOU TO PARTICIPATE in their religion and/or immorality with them.  HOW IS THAT “tolerance”...?  How then can they be behaving in “good faith”...?  All such cases are spurious and should not only be thrown out of court, but the spurious litigants should be made examples of.  It is false prosecution, terrorism, attempted grand theft, persecution, and a violation of the Constitutional rights of the one they are attacking.
[This also shows the consequences of the immorality of “incorporating”.  Corporations have no rights; only privileges granted by the State—and if evil people hijack the State, then evil people decide what hoops corporations have to jump through.  Corporations are limited liability companies because the individual business owners are immoral and don’t want to be held accountable for their own actions.  This compounded, again, by the perceived need for such—evil people in position of power (politicians, judges) who pervert the law and entertain spurious lawsuits.  Common Law businesses do not have to jump through the hoops of the State.  Common Law businesses should have a sign on the door: “Note: If you do not know how to walk without slipping and falling down or if you do not know how to circumnavigate isles without skewering or hurting yourself in any manner, STOP NOW, turn around, and do not enter: We do not want your business”.  Who do such evil people “sue” when they slip and fall on their own property?  Every product should have this generic disclaimer on it (which I now copyright and patent):
“If you are a total moron please consult your lawyer before purchasing or using this product.”  
Every business, likewise:
“If you are a total moron do not enter this establishment or its premises without your seeing-eye-lawyer to guide you through all of the dangers and pitfalls of life that the vast majority of people seem to have no trouble avoiding.”]

#4 - Questions to be Routinely Asked—while Administering Truth Serum and Polygraph—to ALL Goverment Employees, Politicians, Judges, etc. — How They Can Be Kept On a Tight Leash

All politicians and appointed statesmen (judges, etc.) and governmental employees should be given periodic, random drug, polygraph / lie detector (with truth serum), mental competency, and standardized educational tests—and they should also be given such tests BEFORE they are even allowed to run for office.

Questions to ask during the truth serum / polygraph:

1. Have you ever committed a crime and covered it up or covered up someone elses crime?

2. Are you going to defend the US Constitution in the spirit in which it was formulated and ratified?  Do you actually know the Constitution.  You will be given a test on it with questions that you are to answer and those answers will be compared to what the Constitution actually means, based upon what it meant at the time that the Founders framed it according to the Common Law, not Civil Law.

3. Have you ever committed any act of Treason?  Do you realize that the penalty for Treason is death?  Do you know what Treason is?

4. Do you plan on subverting the U.S. Constitution?

5. Has any person or persons (individual or group) ever paid you (in any way, by any medium, including “favors”) to use your Congressional vote to vote how he / she / they wanted you to vote?  Did you ever accept such payment (in any form) and voted the way that someone else wanted you to rather than how you would have voted on your own?  

6. Have you ever knowingly used your Congressional vote to vote in a manner that you know was unconstitutional?

7. Have you ever used your Congressional vote to vote to spend money not in the budget (that is, money that EXCEEDED the budget), money that the U.S. does not have, or for any unconstitutional purpose? Do you realize that the only valid, legal, Constitutional use for taxpayer money is to provide services solely for those very taxpayers themselves, for services that they cannot provide for themselves, such as the nation’s roads, national defense, etc.).  It is unconstitional and illegal to use that money for any other purpose, for any other people, for any other nation.  It does not matter “how much” money is there.  It is the people’s money, not yours.  If there is more there than is needed, then the people are being taxed too much, which is treason.

8. Do you realize that you are the servant of the people, not the master?

9. Have you ever or do you plan on violating any of your campaign promises or oath of office?

10. Have you ever done anything in your political career that was a conflict of interests and you did not recuse yourself or resign?

11. Are you a communist? (this would entail actually knowing what communism is, which most don’t; most Democrats are actually communists and don’t know it; most Republics are also).

12. Do you think that U.S. politicians have any responsibility to anyone other than the U.S. taxpayers and lawful citizens?

13. Have you ever used drugs or alcohol while on the job?

14. Do you come to work late on a regular basis?  Have you ever done so and not made up for it by working more hours the next day?

15. Do you leave work early on weekends and holidays?

16. Do you leave work early any other time when it suits you? or take “personal time” when it suits you?  Do you realize what “public servant” means?

17. Have you memorized the U.S. Constitution?  Have you ever actually fully read the U.S. Constitution?  Do you agree with it or have disdain for it?

18. When was the last time that you read the entire U.S. Constitution?  give a ballpark estimate within days, weeks, months, years, or decades.  Do you read it completely even once a year?

19. Do you understand that trying to change the Constitution as framed by the Founders, is Sedition against the U.S. government (which is the TRUE people; not imported aliens) and High Treason?  Do you still remember the penalty?

20. Do you understand that you do NOT have the right to vote to raise your own salary or festoon yourself with ANY benefits?

21. Do you understand that when in the performance of your job you do something illegal, YOU PERSONALLY are responsible for your crimes to the parties that you injured and it is YOU who will be sued or make payoff settlements, not the government in any form? and that you are also liable for criminal prosecution commensurate with the magnitude of your crime, which calls for special harshness in sentence if you used the power or position of that office to commit the crime.  When you commit an act not within your job description it is ex officio, as far as those whom you wrong (and the people, the “government” is not responsible for your actions—YOU are).  Do you realize that if you commit a crime using your office, that while it was a crime against that individual, that it is also a violation of your oath of office and it is also a crime against all of your constituents who elected you?

22. Do you realize that the people don’t owe retired politicians ANYTHING for having been well-paid—OVERPAID—in the performance of their duty in the honor of serving their nation?  If you want a good retirement plan INVEST YOUR MONEY WISELY and don’t do anything to destroy the U.S. economy (which is terrorism and grand theft and high treason in itself).

23. Do you have any moral objections to the U.S. Constitution as framed by our Founders?

[Note to Hillary: “I can’t remember”, “I don’t recall”, etc. are not valid answers.  Any question that you cannot answer, in regard to something that you actually said or did will be construed as “GUILTY”.  You do not have the right to remain silent!  You WAIVED all of your Constitutional Rights as an individual when you decided to try to grasp the brass ring by being elected to PUBLIC OFFICE and Thomas Jefferson, one of the Framers of our Government said that “When a person assumes a public trust [office] he should consider himself public property”.  YOU are the servant / slave.  Not the people.  YOU have NO rights.  The people have ALL the rights.  YOU have NO authority.  The PEOPLE have ALL of the authority and delegate A LITTLE of it to you as a TRUST, not as a right.  Note to Bill Clinton: Don’t ask any words to be “defined”, if you (a presumed college graduate at prestigious universities with prestigious grants and honors) are TOO STUPID (or corrupt) to answer the questions then this test is over and the verdict is “GUILTY”.]