"We will bury you!" —Khrushchev (but I only mean that in the most-loving way possible; don't twist my words; we believe in peaceful co-existence and have never forced our will on any nation)

By on

Nikita Khrushchev reportedly delivered a speech before the U.N. on September 29, 1959, which contained his prediction for America.  Some claim that most Americans who were old enough to watch the TV news coverage remember him banging his shoe on the podium.  He reportedly said:

“Your children’s children will live under communism.  You Americans are so gullible.  No, you won’t accept communism outright; but we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism.  We will not have to fight you; We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands.”  

[It seems that he was quoting Lenin, who said:

“First we will take Eastern Europe, then the masses of Asia.  We will encircle the last bastion of capitalism, the United States of America. We will not need to fight. It will fall as a ripe fruit into our hands.”]

First Secretary Khrushchev also said, addressing Western Bloc ambassadors at a reception at the Polish embassy in Moscow (in the presence of communist Polish statesman Wladyslaw Gomulka), a few years earlier (November 18, 1956); as reported by The Milwaukee Sentinel, November 19, 1956, “Envoys Stalk Again As Nikita Rants” and various other news sources (including Time magazine, that stated that Khrushchev declared this “at the final reception”):

“We are Bolsheviks! .... About the capitalist states, it doesn’t depend on you whether or not we exist.  If you don’t like us, don’t accept our invitations, and don’t invite us to come to see you.  Whether you like it or not, history is on our side.  We will bury you!”

The phrase “we will bury you” was originally translated into English by Khrushchev’s personal interpreter Viktor Sukhodrev.  Of course, the leftists, embarrassed that this has come to light, will claim these quotes are spurious.  Reagan frequently quoted them.  

Khrushchev tried to deny that he said such things, or he claimed that his statements were twisted out of context.  However, he later contradicted himself, when in a speech in Yogoslavia, on August 24, 1963, he expressed:

“I once said, ‘We will bury you,’ and I got into trouble with it.  Of course we will not bury you with a shovel.  Your own working class will bury you.”

But his own sons themselves recorded that on other occassions Khrushchev said,

“...we must take a shovel and dig a deep grave, and bury colonialism as deep as we can...” (Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev, Sergei Khrushchev, George Shriver, Stephen Shenfield.  Memoirs of Nikita Khrushchev: Statesman, 1953–1964, Penn State Press, 2007, p. 893)

In further attempted damage control, Krushchev expressed,

“You may remember my speech in America when I said that your grandchilden will live under communism.  I do not say that we shall destroy capitalism by means of war.  No, I have never said this and never will.  I said that the development of human society leads to a progressive regime winning over an obsolete regime.  Therefore, capitalism, having played out its positive part, has grown old, and socialism and communism are coming to take its place.

“It is thus not we communists in the Soviet Union or communists in other socialist countries, not communists in capitalist countries, but the peoples in each country who will chose for themselves the system under which they will live better.  We are convinced that sooner or later all the poeple on earth will choose and give their preference to the socialist system; and communists, as the most advanced detatchment of the working class, are leading and pointing the way for the movement of the working class and all working people.  This is quite a different thing, and it is in essence diametrically opposed to the statements of some brash orators in the United States who are gathering themselves for a campaign for the destruction of communism.” (from a letter released from the CIA files in 1/22/2002, of a letter Krushchev sent to Prime Minister Macmillan, 4 August 1960)

[* https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP73B00296R00020004008... ]

Here Khrushchev engages in dishonesty.  No one claimed that he said that he intended to “bury us” or make our children communists via military mightbut through propaganda and subversion.

The Soviet delegation to the U.N. General Assembly in New York (5, October 1957) also denied the “bury you” statement and denied their intention to destroy the West, and had the amazing bald-facedness to declare:

“It is a matter of common knowledge that, from the very first days of its existence, the Soviet Union has always stood for peaceful coexistence among states, irrespective of their social systems.  This refers to the United States as well.  In its relations with other states, the Soviet Union has proved its desire to base relations with other countries on principles of peaceful coexistence”. (from the same released CIA document quoted elsewhere herein.)

Needless to say, the outright delusion lies in this statement are astounding... all of the nations the fell to Communism (including Russia itself) all fell by peaceful means and the Bolsheviks never forced their form of government on anyone?  Russia?  Czechoslovakia?  Hungary?  Roumania?  Baltic states?  Balkan states?  Ukraine?  Belarus?  African nations?  Central and South American nations?  Spain?  Portugal?  etc.

The same CIA report disclosed:

“There is no doubt that capitalism will topple.  However, it will not topple of its own accord.  Our successes will inspire the working class of all capitalist coutnries to a more determined and active revolutionary class struggle.  We have helped them and will continue to help them by our example of building communism.  People of various countries struggling for their freedom and independence are receiving our aid today.  Tomorrow there will be even greater opportunities to give help of another type as well.” [Emphasis mine.  R.A.B.]  (from Report to CPSU Central Committee plenum, 21, June, 1963)

So, despite his other claims that the people themselves will rise up because capitalism will have revealed itself to be week and passe, he here admits that capitalism will not fall of itself and that the Soviet Union is actively helping interfere and subvert and finance revolutionary forces in other nations.  We know from other sources that often these forces are aliens that immigrate and set down roots and pretend to be “good Americans” (or the equivalent in other nations), but are there to undermine and cause unrest, chaos, revolution, through propaganda and violence.  Kenneth Goff attested to this in his many anti-communist books and lectures (before he was assassinated, that is).

In The Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates..., Volume 107, Part 24, Appendix, page A6090, Monday August 7, 1961, in a section titled, “The Wrong Kind of War” the extended comments of Hon. Edgar W. Hiestand of California in the House of Representatives are recorded:

“Mr. Speaker, many of us are convinced that we may be waging war against the Communist conspiracy by a wrong kind of war.  The Soviet achievements, though spectacular, are misleading.  There is plenty of evidence that the Soviets do not want a shooting war.  Their economy and production simply cannot stand it, and they are shrewd enough to avoid it.

[Note: Is it not odd that we then gave support to the Soviet Union / Communist Russia and Communist China, helping improve them strengthen them, give them technology, and have even given China our economy for the past 3 decades—to the point that both China and Russia now are strong, and Russia has even surpassed us in military technology, whereas, in the past, they were stagnant and underdeveloped?  Brackets mine.  R.A.B.]

“We are spending more than $40 billion per year on military armaments to meet a war which I hope will never be fought.  Russia has been restrained from military action directly against America, simply because of fear of massive military retaliation.  Consequently, Khrushchev employs the other weapons more deadly than missiles.

“Let us examine that arsenal of deadly weapons employed 24 hours a day by the international conspiracy: (1) propaganda, (2) organization, (3) infiltration, (4) popular fronts, (5) deceiving tourism in Russia, (6) destroying anti-communists, (7) violence and murder, (8) Communist schools.

“America and the Free World are absolutely unprepared to meet this onslaught.  Our great military strength will not save us if we are conquered by a war of words.  

“Let us look at the volume of propaganda in this arsenal of words.  The Kremlin uses 150,000 hours per week of radio propaganda in every language: 200 big propaganda films per year; 120 million propaganda books each year (millions of these are carried free in our mails); 2 billion propaganda pamphlets every year; 20 thousand Russian stars send out every year on propaganda and publicity missions all over the world.  Our propaganda is less than 1 percent of what I have just listed.

“How frightened would you be if our military strength was equal to only 1 percent of that of Russia?  One is just as deadly for you and your children as is the other, and yet at this critical time your military establishment has ordered that no one in the military may take part in any anti-Communist school or rightwing organization.  Our Defense Department has fallen prey to Communist propaganda which is out to destroy all anti-Communist organizations.”

“America has never lost a war for lack of missiles, planes, or other weapons.  Let’s look at our losses and place the blame where it belongs: Yalta—a Communist victory because President Roosevelt did not recognize the danger of the International Conspiracy.  China—we lost in a torrent of massive propaganda which convinced the world that Mao Tse-tung was an agrarian reformer; Korea—we had the armaments to destroy Red China.  Again, the Communist propaganda convinced England that we should not destroy Red China and England demanded the removal of General MacArthur. ....

“Until this country recognizes that we are losing every engagement to Communist propaganda and takes a positive action to meet this enemy with the same weapons they use, we will fall like a ripe fruit, without firing a single missile.”

[Note: Do you think that it is a mere “coincidence” that Hiestand used these phrases, “ripe fruit” and “without firing a missile”, only about 2 years after Khrushchev is reported to have used those very or similar phrases?  Brackets mine.  R.A.B.]

Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich in a special meeting of the Emergency Council of European Rabbis (January 12, 1952) in Budapest, Hungary gleefully declared,

“I can state with assurance that the last generation of white women is now being born.  Our control of communism will, in the interests of peace and wiping out inter-racial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with whites.  The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, and the white men with dark women.  Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory.”

[Note: The leftist deniers, propagandists, disinformation specialists claim that Eustace Mullins “made this up” in the 1950s.  First of all, Mullins was a researcher, not a fabricator.  He would not have damaged his reputation by making things up.  Secondly, like the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (in existence in the mid-1800s and in the early 1900s) if they are “spurious” or “forgeries”—then the forgers were the greatest prophets to walk the earth since Isaiah and Jeremiah, because their “spurious prophecy” (LONG before anyone would have dreamed it could ever become reality) has come to pass exactly as they claimed these subersive documents and meetings said that they would.  No statistician would deny the impossibility of this taking place were the conspiracy not genuine.  Hollywood and the media have been the greatest mouth-pieces to bring this about and Jews own and control both.  Jews are unabashed about turning Christendom socialist, nonchristian, and nonwhite.  Thirdly, just because something cannot be found does not mean that it does not exist (ever lose something?)—just because something is stolen does not mean that it does not exist (ever had something stolen?)—and just because something was destroyed, does not mean that it never existed.  The Soviets were experts at “sanitization” (maybe the CIA learned all their secrets from them); they are known for having utterly destroyed evidence; and then supplanting it with spuriously written history or other information.  Communist revolutionaries used so many aliases and covered their tracks, that it is impossible to find any historical information on some of them.  Since this quote that liars—without a shred of evidence—claim that Mullins “made up” was from a speech given at a clandestine meeting in 1952, it is not unreasonable to realize that the news agencies were not covering it and that a transcript of all that was said was not published.  It would not have been the first secret meeting to remain clandestine.  Do not newspapers and even court trials and investigations have “confidential sources”...?  Have some individuals not even gone to jail for refusing to divulge their sources?  Anything that the enemy is embarrassed to have revealed they claim is a “forgery” or “made up”.  However, the burden of proof is on them to prove it.  Now, one cannot prove that something does not exist; but one can attempt to prove that something never happened, or someone engaged in deceit.  As far as I know, such leftists have never attempted to prove either; they only resort to their favorite past-time: Talmudic mudslinging.  Brackets mine.  R.A.B.]

Listen also to what the “jewish” Chairman of the American Communist Party, Gus Hall (1910-2000), brazenly declared:

“The Christians are always singing about the blood.  Let us give them enough of it!  Let us cut their throats and drag them over the altar!  And let them drown in their own blood!  I dream of the day when the last priest is strangled on the guts of the last preacher.”

Does that sound like peaceful coexistence and non-interference?

[For more-damning proof, see my book, A Bolshevik Primer, my editions of Frank Britton’s, Behind Communism (retypeset, with improved photos and added notes), Marx and Engels’, The Communist Manifesto (with illustrated, biographical and historical introduction), Pranaitis’ The Talmud Unmasked (with illustrated, biographical and historical introduction), my book, Fearless and Godly Pioneers for the Truth, and many titles by Kenneth Goff.  See also my edition of Wilton’s, Last Days of the Romanovs, which details the genocide of an entire family and how the world’s greatest superpower was stolen—without a war or hardly a shot (except for the susbsequent executions).  See also Mullins’, The Secret Holocaust, and the U.S. Government Subcommittee Report, The Human Cost of Soviet Communism, and Death at Kaytn, and Soviet Evidence at Katyn (inquire if you cannot locate the prices).    Inquire or search book lists a this site, such as: ___Comprehensive Catalog NOVEMBER 2019 - Rare Titles on Race, Civilization, Exposing Political Corruption / Conspiracies (PDF) ]

Watch this short video:


Mind blowing speech by Robert Welch in 1958 predicting Insiders plans to destroy America - 9 minutes